Jump to content

Chick

Member
  • Posts

    1,955
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Chick

  1. Chick

    Oakhurst

    What was going on in Oakhurst Grove? Three police cars, tow away truck & Lambeth council oficial.
  2. I would attend but have to go to Cambridge. Good luck and good weather!
  3. Chick

    Lia Thomas

    What is GC and cis?
  4. "A look at STW's website this morning and it has 4 'leading articles', 2 of which are pointing the finger at NATO being the cause for the war in Ukraine." Again so what? That doesn't mean STW is pro Putin or pro Russia, just against all war's in what ever country and for what ever reason.
  5. So what. Tatchell doesn't represent any body apart from Tatchell. I still haven't seen any evidence to suggest STW are pro Russian, quite the opposite. Don't forget we were happy to bomb Syria. diable rouge Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > As Peter Tatchell points out, STW have previous > when it comes to covert support for Putin and > Russia... > > When we stood in solidarity with #Syria's > democrats against Russian imperialism in 2016, > Stop the War did NOT condemn #Russia's terror > bombing of civilians in #Aleppo & other Syrian > cities. They called us "agents of US imperialism"
  6. "You keep saying I'm not answering but I am answering and you aren't listening - Putin is using NATO as an excuse to justify his behaviour - and STW are buying it and repeating it. SO they are defect supporting Putin. I'm not saying STW literally back the ware - I'm saying they are giving Putin support by agreeing with his lies" Putin doesn't need an excuse, look at Crimea in 2014. No body in STW supports or gives sucker to Putin. What you are suggesting is as daft as saying if you support a united Ireland you must support the IRA.
  7. Maybe I have missed something, aren't NATO moving eastward? I have seen many pictures from the demonstration at the weekend and I didn't see one pro Russia poster. You still haven't given any evidence that STW is pro Putin, it isn't, that's the kind of rubbish Johnson & co spout. So again where is your evidence that STW movement is pro Putin?
  8. I think it's reasonable to criticise NATO without in any way supporting Putin's position. The track record of NATO hasn't been brilliant. Opposing the invasion of Iraq didn't mean you supported Hussain.
  9. I don't think anyone on Stop the war protest supported Russia and you have no evidence that they did. I personally Loath Putin and have done so since his sojourn into Chechnya in the 90's. (which we kept quiet about) > > So when I see a stop the war movement on streets > of London, waving their Russian flags and blaming > the west, or NATO for what is happening (the same > words as Putin) then yes, I am going to conclude > they have taken Putin's side
  10. So are you all gung ho and pro war? Where is your evidence that Stop the War movement is pro Russia? It simply against war, has been since 2003. Sephiroth Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I see the stop the war clowns are protesting in > London today. With their hammer and sickle flags. > > > Ffs
  11. KK your in box is full again.
  12. Are you for real? Brideshead Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi EDF-ers!!! > > Sad to report that the daily newspapers are > already going wrong again? after just only 3 or 4 > weeks. > > Last Monday there were NO newspapers at all at > 1400. No explanation, no apology, no information. > > Today - inexplicably - no Daily Mirror. > > No explanation, no apology, no concern by staff. > Just ?it wasn?t in the delivery?. > > Two failures in one week? Maybe chase up the > supplier? Maybe that?s way over dramatic! > > Wonder if Southwark council - that is you & me - > the taxpayers are still being billed for > literally, well, nothing? Send your answers in on > a postcard, don?t even waste EDF server data > storage!!! > > Maybe local government Southwark are trying to > match the Boris government at national level. > Dysfunctional, unaccountable, ineffective, > inconsistent & unable to achieve even the simplest > thing. (Disclaimer: Last sentence is a ?Personal > opinion?).
  13. Chick

    Dick?s Out

    She should have gone years ago.
  14. Then stop reading it!
  15. I have already offered my service as a TU rep.
  16. How long has she worked there? Is it more than two years?
  17. This must be tongue in cheek. Rocket back packs? CPR Dave Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > "I do think they'll question why we did so little > to discourage car use generally." > > I disagree with that too. > > In about 15 years from now cars will be fully > automated and electric. The internal combustion > engine will be a museum piece. There will be very > little pollution and no road traffic accidents > whatsoever. > > And in the future beyond that people will use > personal aviation machines which will no doubt > still irritate all the penny farthing fetishists. > > But you can't hold back progress. It's innate and > essential to our survival.
  18. Set up a standing order they can't change that only you can.
  19. In the meantime they are slowly privatising the NHS and all we get is this distraction. TheCat Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Im really not....love him or hate him....while > he's fighting reputational fires related to > relevelations from stuff that happened 18 months > ago....hes not focussed on actually running the > country (one could argue if he ever was to be > fair)... > > So the national just drifts, and drifts with > nothing but hot air underpinning it.....
  20. More Israeli apartheid: https://mondoweiss.net/2021/12/the-construction-of-israels-gaza-concentration-camp-is-complete/
  21. What is a YA book?
  22. I'll have a look probably be on Thursday but will try today.
  23. VAT should never been applied to energy.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...