Mick Mac Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Not Cabrera, or Scott please. Very poor from a betting perspective .... Great for Adam Scott, who really deserves it.
There was racism in Ireland when I was there in a Jim davidson joke sort of way. But as there were little or no foreigners especially black people there was noone to take offence or to cause people to look at themselves properly. I'd expect it has improved but not to the extent of the pc world we live in here. I certainly would not try to be holier than thou about it EP. I'd leave it if I were you and let someone else point it out. Moving to a new place I'd keep stum and ease yourself in. [You know be respectful of your new hosts. A bit like I am , here. ;) ]
Otta Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Is it Mick Mac? > > I've written a few thibgs whuch have caused a > couple of people to unfriend me, but nothing I > regret. Boom boom. "Basil Brush style".
I see myself as a Mourinho type. Not a great player myself but I can help others outperform their normal capabilities. Hence I'm reaching out to AM to help him through this.
He said I went back a couple of yards. He knew he wasn't within the spirit of near as possible to where the previous shot was taken from. Having broken the rule and this being pointed out to him he should withdraw. He seriously risks his reputation as one of the golfing greats.
Change of rule for trial by TV. "The governing bodies determined players should not be disqualified because of "facts that he or she didn't know and could not reasonably have discovered prior to returning his scorecard. Thus, stroke penalties will be added to a score retrospectively." Difference is that Tiger knew he went back two yards as he said so in the post round interview therefore he should have known he had broken the rule and signed for the wrong score before it hit the headlines. If he had signed his card then he should have withdrawn. This will hang over him if he wins.
Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Jah Lush Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > On your own head be it. > > I may see you in the CL Final Mr.Lush. If so I'll > be pinning this to my laptop if/when I make my > prediction. I have no idea how you find yourself in the semis AM. Poor Lad. Feel free to PM me for advice on your scores.
Probably won't happen but a lot of noise surrounding possible disqualification for Woods after taking a drop and saying he went "back 2 yards" which should have been close to original spot....
Alan Medic Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Arsenal 3 Norwich 1 > Aston Villa 2 Fulham 1 > Everton 1 QPR 2 > Reading 1 Liverpool 2 > Southampton 3 West Ham 1 > > Newcastle 1 Sunderland 1 > Stoke 0 Man Utd 2 > > Arsenal 2 Everton 1 > > Man City 2 Wigan 2 > West Ham 1 Man Utd 1 > Fulham 2 Chelsea 1
El Pibe Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > looks like DM gave up on the blog as well as here, > no updates for 9 months or so. > Ant is doing great film reviews > And of course Brendan is in purgatory Surrey. Yes I also noticed recently that DMs blog had finished. No more jokes about the biggest bonus on the city etc. Shame.
Rory, Kucher, Stenson, Jacobsen and Zach Johnson. Only Kuchar going well so far. Rory a little out of sorts but anything under par would keep him in touch.
StraferJack Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Sorry MM - I didn't make myself understood > > I put a ? at the end of "one of us" to indicate > she was divisive - ie it mattered to her if > decisions affected "us" or "them". > > "Us" in this case meaning only those who supported > her, not "we, the people" I see - I'm up to speed now ... hence I now completly agree.
I'm surprised you say that SJ. I actually thought she made little or no attempt to be "one of us", for major sections of society at least. She drove forward, determined, caring little about public opinion.