Dogkennelhillbilly

chrisbeach Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > peckham_ryu Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Strangers come to town; construction and scrap > are > > both staples of itinerant work; scaffolding is > > stolen. That might be a case of "two plus two > > equals five", but then again it might not. I'm > > suggesting suspicion, not marching with > > pitchforks. > > "I rest my case," Mr Straw added. > > http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/428915.stm Almost 20 years ago a bloke on the radio half-heard some other bloke on the radio say something and that proves something?

Ooh, saucy! (Yes, I agree).

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Never been to 'Turtle Bay'. But it looks like > Disneyfied Caribbean-lite for white people. Maybe > an apt metaphor for the rapidly changing > demographic of the area. Bah humbug. If you really thought the authentic Caribbean or Peckham was so great, you'd live there. But you don't - you live in New Cross and post thousands of times on the East Dulwich Forum.

diddly28 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > They should just scrap then entirely. All they do > is delay traffic and have it stood around > needlessly and increasing journey times. I agree with you that there are too many cars in London but i don't think scrapping them entirely is going to work.

Guy Fieri, screaming about Spain at the top of his lungs, at MeatLiquor.

Administrator Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I've removed the photos as it may affect the legal > process. A photo on this forum is not going to prejudice a trial. I mean, apart from anything else, there is no trial and nothing to be sub judice yet. Taking the photo down does mean that witnesses might be missed, though.

You can go from East Dulwich or New Cross into London Bridge and back on the direct train to Gatwick.

Richard Dawkins, striding purposefully into Dulwich Picture Gallery.

Nigello Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Maybe the parents ought to have picked up the > glass and allowed their children and other > children to play in safety. A responsible adult > ought to be able to remove a relatively small > amount of rubbish - even broken glass - without > coming to any harm, but most folk simply CBA. (I > speak as someone who CBA and who does pick up > cans, bottles etc.) Speaking as someone that does quite often show up at 7am on a Sunday morning at the playground (sometimes I even take the kid), it's not easy to clear up a whole playground of rubbish while simultaneously making sure your child doesn't swan dive off the top of a climbing frame. I don't often pack gloves, broom and shovel into the pram but maybe I should start. I'll pick up the worst of stuff but I'm not going to be able to clear away a ton of smashed glass. In addition to kids and dickheads making a mess, I also think there is a hardware problem with the bins: if it's busy, they get full and people balance their crap on top of the bins (and obviously they scatter everywhere). If there's food chucked in the bins, I suspect the foxes are digging it out (which again scatters stuff everywhere). More bins with a flap might reduce the problem. But tbh I would have thought the best thing would be to get a sweeper around at 6am every day and to stop the naughtiness at night (I have no real idea how realistic that is).

And did our MP Helen Hayes show up to a recent debate on rail service and advocate her constituents' views? No she did not: http://www.thecanary.co/2016/09/14/mps-zero-hours-contract-dont-turn-dont-get-paid-opinion/ But then again she has a 30% lead over the Tories...

Alastair Campbell at Dulwich Picture Gallery.

peckham_ryu Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hello OP. It's worth seeing what the experts on > the forums at PePiPoo.com have to help you Pepipoo is filled with barrack lawyers and Internet experts who copy stuff from one place, paste it in another place, and then project whatever meaning onto the text they want to find.

Nightmare. My sympathies. That's a bizarre crime.

The coffee at Badgers Bakery is fine, the staff are very nice and they've done a good job with the inside and outside seating. I'm not crazy about all the pastries but the classic English bakery stuff like sausage rolls etc are good.

Powder Cosmetics at 369 Lordship Lane is now open. It looks very nice inside but I wouldn't really know what the selection or prices are like... Also, I see that the sunbed shop at 355 Lordship Lane (which I never ever saw open) has been sold. Hopeful that means a real business will move in soon and make that shopping strip a bit more lively.

Toby Anstis going into the cinema

Jennys Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Articles in > yesterday's Evening Standard say they have > scrapped plans for any new stores, even where they > had already announced plans to locate new > Waitroses. Articles in the Evening Standard said Prince Charles was the Londoner of the Decade.

Dave "Comedy Dave" Vitty, getting into an ?ber at Oddonos

Why not?

You drink bottled water when there a perfectly good puddles you could drink from outside? The decadence of it all...

Wardens have got nothing to do with it.

Getting further away from East Dulwich tube ;) but I find Jade's milk-added coffees far too milky. A soup bowl of warm milk with a shot of coffee added.

Edele or Keavy (not sure which for obvious reasons) from B*witched by SMB's.

On one of the > (many) other M&S threads, someone who lives on a > neighboring street mentioned that residents were > working on something around that with the store > and thought they were close to a workable > arrangement but I have no idea regarding the > specifics. Residents on the Grove will want the trucks on Lordship Lane. The residents can't make M and S comply with the law or make an agreement that works for everyone. That's what local government is supposed to do.

???? wrote: > > 'Evil' Big Buisness makes a profit by supplying > goods and services that people want..... Thanks for explaining how capitalism works. In this world dominated workers' co?peratives and collectively owned enterprises, I hadn't picked up on it. It seems a bit weird that they didn't mention it on that eceonmics degree I did, but presumably they foresaw the rise of smartarses on Internet forums and figured it would all work itself out. I had also wondered if the the morality of something was proportional to its profitability, so it's nice to have that confirmed once and for all... ...you tit