sally buying

rendelharris Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > sally buying Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Rendell Harris > > > > I am sure you realised that housebound did not > > mean they could not get out but their freedom > > would be somewhat curtailed with out their own > > transport > > So you were using a term that didn't mean anything > like what you meant? Why? By the way, re your > post, it is pretty possible to carry shopping on > the bus, I've done it lots of times. As usual you can have the last word.

Rendell Harris I am sure you realised that housebound did not mean they could not get out but their freedom would be somewhat curtailed with out their own transport

Not only diesel cars but petrol cars. Well maintained and pristine cars scrapped because of Khans Ill thought out idea and not thought all the way through. Bann from city centres but not travel within the South and North Circular road. Many people will just not be able to buy new cars. Which render them house bound. Ever tried carrying shopping on any London bus route?

Someone has now dug the road up across the the Bellenden/Chadwick Junction

BanJo Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Unfortunately there has been another crash on > Barry Road this lunchtime. A car pulled out of > Silvester Road in to the path of an oncoming > vehicle which then rolled and landed on the > opposite side of the road by the driveway to the > church. Only one person was in the car travelling > down Barry Road apparently but both airbags were > activated and the car is very damaged - the driver > I understand has been taken to hospital. I hope > everyone involved is OK. > > I drove down Sydenham Hill this morning and noted > that due to the 3 or 4 speed cameras, NOBODY does > over 20mph and that road similar to Barry Road, > has buses going down it and no speed bumps that I > am aware of. > > I'm going to write to the council and I'm happy to > organise a petition if there's interest. > > We need some speed cameras on Barry Road to stop > any more people getting hurt. This appears to be a case of bad driving and not looking when pulling out in front of moving traffic and not speeding

.

jimlad48 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I have no insight to the Southwark decision making > process. I appreciate 2hrs is frustrating but it > is better than what exists now. What exist now for our street was because of the recent all day CPZ's that have come into effect.

"People had a vote, they were offered two options by the council and all day parking narrowly pipped it." We voted by a majority of 64% for all day parking for the same reason as you did and we were told we could not have it. We were offered no options. Why do the Council then say we always listen to the majority vote in all their consultations and then refuse what people want. Why?

We are having to have a CPZ, problem is it only operates 11-1 pm. We are slap bang in the middle of your CPZ which operates 0830-1830. Where do you think the parking will go. Our street. Glad you are enjoying your CPZ.

Far too simple for the eco warriors. First rate idea

DKH CPZ Consultation Hi Sally, > The next step is the formal Traffic Management > Order which is effectively a formal public > consultation. Real opportunity for you to make the > case for longer hour of operations and equally > those against. > I'll endeavour to make people aware when this > stage starts. Do you have any dates when this meeting will take place. Southwark does not answer to the request. Many thanks

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hi Pugwash, > If you can put me in touch with some current > social workers, OT's working in Southwark > experiencing this problem I will work to et this > resolved for them - I know not strictly in East > Dulwich ward it must have some knock on impact of > vulnerable people I our patch. > > Hi Sally, > The next step is the formal Traffic Management > Order which is effectively a formal public > consultation. Real opportunity for you to make the > case for longer hour of operations and equally > those against. > I'll endeavour to make people aware when this > stage starts. Do you have any dates when this meeting will take place Thanks

Not sure what that means. But Happy Christmas to you and a good New Year.

Because the comments you made can also can be referred back to earlier posts on this thread regarding the need and consequences of ill thought out CPZ plans.

This is why the 11-2 CPZ for Chadwick Road will not work. All surrounding roads are 0830-1830 hours. Upper Chadwick will become an island surrounded by all day CPZ's. Chadwick is already is a parking haven for vehicles you have mention above, although we can also add in vehicles left parked up by local garages. Life will still be the same with no resident parking. If you have to go out hoping there will be parking when you come back. As 64% of residents voted for all day parking they should have their wishes respected. Please refer to jimlad48 comments earlier in the thread. Your comment many many vans parked up over night means they do not have to move until almost midday, then move and come back until the next day. Southwark should listen to residents, will they, I doubt it.

jimlad48 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > mikeb Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > Of course parking fine revenues are greater > than > > the immediate cost of enforcing the regulations. > > > As I understand it, the requirement is for > > councils to 'invest' net revenue raised into > local > > transport improvements. > > > > But (a) improving transport is already a > > responsibility of councils and (b) cash is > > fungible, so diverting parking revenues to this > > activity means other cash can be freed up. So > > economically, it is indistinguishable from > > maximising parking fines to generate revenue > for > > the council. > > > > Implementing a CPZ will reduce total parking > > spaces available (more yellow lines), will not > > guarantee a space outside your house and will > > incur additional hassle and cost when dealing > with > > tradesmen / visitors / skips etc. This may be > > worth it but it really depends on how many > > non-locals / commuters are parking in your > street. > > I have heard this rubbish a number of times from > people opposed to the CPZ I helped campaign for. > Strangely though we have gone from an area where > noise was intolerable at all hours due to commuter > cars finding spaces, and where we regularly could > not find a space among 6 streets over a roughly > 1/2 mile area at any time of day to suddenly > having peace, quiet and more parking spaces than > has been seen in over a decade 7 days per week. > > Getting a CPZ has made a life changing difference > to our area, spacea are up, noise is down and > stress levels decrease dramatically as suddenly > only residents are allowed to park. I cannot > emphasise enough.how goood it is to be in a CPZ. What are the hours of your CPZ please

Thanks for confirming this. Not only Grove Park but Chadwick Road also plus all surrounding roads. The whole area is to be a CPZ. Up for consultation decision by Cabinet Member but already decided only needs to be rubber stamped. The whole area is now choked with pushed out commuter cars. Move and you never get back Then East Dulwich area is next

Sally Eva Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > spider69 Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > A new CPZ has come into effect on the area > > surrounding Lyndhurst Grove, Crofton Road etc. > > "The Toastrack". > > > > Not sure if this will effect you but many roads > > with free parking off of Bellenden Road seem to > be > > solid. > > > > I can confirm that Chadwick Road and Grove > Park, > > free parking at the moment, is solid. Move and > you > > will never get back. No joke. > > > > It used to be that traffic moved in the evening > > now ever since this CPZ cars just sit and never > > move. > > > > Even untaxed/no mot are just left by Southwark > > even if reported. One less space to be used > > > > It certainly appears that Southwark want > residents > > to request CPZ's as they move the problem > > elsewhere. It is residents who request a CPZ > only > > because they have inherited someone else's > problem > > not that they actually want one. > > this CPZ hasn't been put into operation yet (or at > least there was no sign of it two weeks ago). I > think it's scheduled to start in the New Year. So > it cannot be the cause of problems elsewhere. > Possibly it will be but it can't be yet. All the warning signs are up, traffic wardens are patrolling and handing out tickets. I saw 6 on McNiel Road last week. On the only 6 cars on the road. The warden is just riding around just looking to pounce. 2 weeks ago we did not have a problem, now we have a massive problem. If it is not in operation as you seem to think perhaps Southwark should cover all the signs up and refund the parking fines. Take a ride around on your bike and take a look.

taper Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > This is getting way way off topic. Is any body really surprised?

After serving the local community for more years than I can remember Mr Patel's, as he is locally known. will be forced to close his newsagents shop due to the rent being put up to unaffordable levels. Bellenden Road as a current "fad road" has not helped local business once their leases come up for renewal. Loss of a very local and much loved business. I wish him well and thank him for all the past years he has served the community. He/Wife will be missed.

Whilst these posts seem to be wetting themselves about a new grocery store, what happens to the tyre shop? A real community asset.

Take a look at the complete breakdown and you will see what a farce this result is. Some roads yes the rest no.

rendelharris Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > For starters if he's at Denmark Hill station he > isn't in Dulwich, he's in Camberwell, so that's > your main point out the window. Secondly, I know > a US veteran who lives in East Dulwich - he's > happily married and settled, but if, heaven > forfend, he developed mental health issues or in > some other way found himself on the streets, why > wouldn't he stay around here? I have no idea if > this guy's genuine or not, but your cynicism > reflects little credit on you. Perhaps your friend could have a word with him and see what the problem/s are. One vet to another

@SebsC we have private messaged you thanks very much

We have started to fill the book and have every card except the following, 51, 66, 81, 82 We would appreciate if anyone would be able to swap for the above. We do have a lot of duplicates and would be very happy to help others out.