Jump to content

ruffers

Member
  • Posts

    2,839
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by ruffers

  1. Mark Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > KD, when were you appointed the voice of the > People's front real people of East Dulwich? I think it was the Queen Mum did it, in the old police station garden. I knew it would be relevant at some point! Pip pip!
  2. KD Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > You cannot properly critic work, so you shout at > it like thugs. > If I may, can I constructively point out I think you'll find it's "critique" work.
  3. Spurs are our bogey team and no bleedin' mistake FACT... but... but... I keep having these fits of hope. And Spurs are away let's not forget. And Spurs are shocking away this season. Is King playing?
  4. The Daily Mail headline generator has been Nick Clegg-ified... COULD NICK CLEGG SCROUNGE OFF HARD-WORKING FAMILIES? WILL NICK CLEGG GIVE THE CHURCH SWINE FLU? http://www.qwghlm.co.uk/toys/dailymail/
  5. And everyone to forget Steve McKenzie's cracker.
  6. ???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I miss Morse :( We watched Lewis on Sunday.
  7. red devil Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > TT describes a Jay, just wondering what the > difference is between a Eurasian and British > Jay... Probably a matter of airspeed..
  8. Interested to know what impression the candidates who said they'd respond and haven't imagine they've created.
  9. Hope so. Poor old Harry's having a whinge about City being in his opinion out of order in the transfer market. Couldn't make that up.
  10. Just watched it and that's Tuesdays sorted for a few weeks, I thought it was excellent.
  11. KD Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > edcam Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > This is the most amusing thread since Colin the > > Catflap Fitter! Is this person real? How on > > earth does he expect us to support him when he > > hasn't furnished us with all the facts. A > > councillor would be insane to enter into > > correspondence with someone making serious > > allegations (if only you would tell us exactly > > what these allegations are.) You would make > much > > more headway if you seemed a little more > > "grounded". > > > ======================================= > > I?m not looking for your support, I was just > voicing an opinion ? as yet we are not under a > Lib-Dem government, so free speech is still a > valid part of our democracy, I know you would > probably like to silence anyone that does not > think the same as you, and when you establish your > own Politb?ro, you can indulge your desires. > > KD Your best post yet, keep it up!
  12. sally676 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ruffers Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > He's just who recently joined the forum under > the > > username KD, seemingly with the sole aim of > > knocking the libdems... > > Ho god, not more conspires stories. Please someone > bring back Charles hiccup Kennedy. > > Sally No, I just thought you might get on. By the way, we're all saying you're paranoid.
  13. Is this post part of the forum libdem brainwashing conspiracy? ;-)
  14. If you read the thread Lindsay you'll get the answer to whether they've heard from the owners.
  15. He's just who recently joined the forum under the username KD, seemingly with the sole aim of knocking the libdems...
  16. sally676 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ruffers Wrote: > -------------------------------------------------- > ----- > > I haven't seen Davidh's post but in the past > posts > > have been deleted from that thread which were > > party political. That thread has become a > useful > > avenue of communication and efforts are made to > > keep it that way without descending into point > > scoring, there's plenty of other places on the > > forum for th > > ruffers dear, Mary Whitehouse rang, she wants her > self-righteousness back, when you are ready > > Sally Sally, I'm not sure if you noticed but the original post in the thread (that's the one at the top, just to help you out there) was a question. If either you or for that matter davidh had bothered reading through the "Local Councillor" thread to which the question related you'd have found the answer in there which I quoted from memory for yourself, quite helpfully I thought if you actually wanted an answer to the question as opposed just an excuse to whinge. Did you really register just to post this stuff? Are you friends with Kevin Donegan?
  17. The Minkey Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Thinking about it, seems strange that it's ringed. > I wonder if it's an escapee from some kind of > aviary - can't think why anyone would ring a > single home bird. In case it gets out?
  18. I haven't seen Davidh's post but in the past posts have been deleted from that thread which were party political. That thread has become a useful avenue of communication and efforts are made to keep it that way without descending into point scoring, there's plenty of other places on the forum for that.
  19. Excellent post jenny, would have liked more detail of the technology though. Bluetooth? RFID? Generic GPS system?
  20. It's been a while since I genuinely laughed out loud at a thread. Do you remember the Queen Mother's visit?
  21. He wrote you didn't he? Confused now. Looking forward to the evidence tomorrow.
  22. Not trying to speak to Loz, but I think this is what's actually being asked. I believe Loz is referring to your site where you say - "Councillor Timothy McNally of Southwark Council sent me a confusing letter and when I asked him several times via both email and Royal Mail to clarify his letter, he chose to ignore my letters and emails." - Where Loz says "And Mr McNally first wrote to you?" Your other "opinions" are over a lack of response to your communications which appear to be initiated by you. This one appears to be initiated by Mr McNally, and Loz is merely trying to clear up whether that is the case. From my perspective I'm wondering what that opening of dialogue was all about.
  23. A great tune from back in the day Well Hung Parliament
  24. ???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > old skoool Nice.
  25. Seeing as I've not seen that for what, nearly 10 years, is this now officially Retro Internet Humour?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...