ruffers

Fulham 4 - 10 man Juventus 1. 4 minutes to go and Fulham going through at the moment.

Is Fulham Juventus not on telly? Cracking game on the radio!

Where were the Germans? Needs sound and possibly not a greatest sporting moment, but a cracking bit of commentary from Barry Davies.

Sandperson Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Hurrah! Well said MM. > > We'll take on all comers Ruffers. You've got to > beat the best to be the best, someday you might > get the chance...;-) I doubt it, we'll find a way of screwing it up before we even get there. My prediction is we finish fourth, then fail to qualify a la Everton in 2005 or whatever it was.

99% are indeed law abiding. I believe only those who are breaking the law get prosecuted though so that's all right. If you don't park where you're not supposed to you'll be fine.

United will get their usual 'bye', Bordeaux at a guess.

We've already heard on here about it being parked near schools at dropping off times, addressing an issue raised on the forum frequently.

PeckhamRose Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Exactly, you councillors and other politicians are > turning everything / seeing everything as a crime. > It is not a crime for a driver/ biker to drive > sensibly over a particular speed limit when one is > able to drive sensibly, see the road in advance > and plan ahead as recommended by the Institute of > Advanced Motoring. But no, politicians say 'let's > make it a 20mph zone' so now we're crims. Er, yes it is a crime. You told us that in your last sentence. It may not be in many people's eyes dangerous, including IAM (as long as you're wearing a Sam Brown), Police Roadcraft etc and if seen you may not get stopped, but it's still against the law and by doing so you are liable to prosecution.

Part of my point I think.

Some similarities between Chelsea's recent home defeats, City and Inter. Italian manager (City) and mentality (Inter), defend like no ones business and switch to attack rapid. Chelsea get frustrated and less effective.

The Ferdinand thing was worse I thought, but still unbelievable Gerrard got off. Amazing how much cheating he does, especially with his inner ear problem that gets worse toward the end of games Liverpool are struggling in (thank you Dara O Brian I think). While I'm here Inter are looking pretty good, 0-0 but Chelsea aren't looking too likely to me.

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I agree that the potholes need fixing, but I don't > agree that it should be at the expense of other > scheduled work - for which the wheels have already > been set in motion. Well put. If the potholes are genuinely dangerous then report them so a decision can be made. In the meantime as we're all well aware there's lots of pot holes around at the moment I will be driving round them.

matthew123 Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Well he knows how to kick a football.. and maybe > they could have him on the red button as part of > alternative pundit team, that includes Garth > Crooks and Gaby Logan, for the dumbed down > audience that you tend to draw during a world cup Crooks. At a World Cup in Africa. I'm looking forward to (the end of) his hard hitting questions.

edf Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > > It's a very good idea having them on the road ... Couldn't disagree more. Given how much of a problem parking cars is, and how easy it is to park bikes off road, how is it a good idea?

Can he go anyway as a non playing member of the party? His influence might still be useful.

kford Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm with mark. The fewer signs the better, for all > road users. Or you get this http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2006/09/signsPA110906_228x283.jpg

James Barber Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Suggestion that perhaps some cycle parking should > be the road. I've been helpfully sent the > attached. > Not sure it would suit Lordship Lane - what do > people think? > If nothing else its made me smile. A very small smile, but a definite no.

Boutros Boutros errr,errrrrrr Ghali.

Narnia Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Rafa for Madrid is my bet. Mourinho for Man City > where he'll have money to spend. Sounds about right. And United win the European Cup (much as I'd hate to see that happen) and Fergie pulls his retirement out of the bag. Big summer of managerial change.

???? Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Could be Desert sand in high cloud..... Seems most likely. It'll be fish next.

Sounds good.

I think the answers I gave are different from the ones I would have given six months ago and for that Councillor Barber has a degree of credit / responsibility (delete as you see fit)

(I'll say in advance I'm an iphone cynic) Can't you access the forum on an iphone then? It works great on my Android phone.

Chelsea boots? Timeless they are!

Marmora Man Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Why does the public even have to know that the > individual in question has been arrested? Ww're > not told of every "on licence" re-offender - this > is simply prurience dressed up as right to know. > > The individual, the victim's mother and the public > would all have been better off if he information > had not been made public. Agreed 100%. It might not be nice but Jamie Bulger's mother was on telly today saying she has the right to know. Sorry, you don't, and neither does anyone else.