Brendan

Exactly what I?ve done every time it?s happened to me before. Make sure my family are safe then grab a weapon and attack the bastards (the robbers not my family).

mockney piers Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > ... clearing the land of my > competitors and impregnating their females would > surely be a much better way of furthering my > genes. It worked wonders for Genghis Khan. That sounds like fun. I may give it a go this weekend.

Succeeding despite the odds being heavily stacked against her, very good form indeed. I would recommend she grows a beard as soon as possible though.

The Chair Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > Note to Brendan: The topic was not reasons why > teenage boys shut themselves in their bedrooms. Excuse me? Do I address you as Mister or Madam Chairman? I?m going to go with Madam for now unless informed to the contrary. Excuse me Madam Chairman but the topic regarding the virtues of the two most well know brands of electric guitar has everything to do with why teenage boys shut themselves in their bedrooms. Music, creative outlet, girls, sex and the pursuit of sex, personal identity, playing with things. I feel that my contributions were perhaps misinterpreted.

sorry cross post there. I was responding to Jeremy.

Ah you see now you?re talking about the relevance of religion. That?s a completely different story. You don?t really need god for religion.

Jolly good show!

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think I have an informed opinion and > have listened to both sides of the argument for a > long time now. The way I see it is it?s doesn?t only have 2 sides nor is it an argument.

Jeremy Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I think I have an informed opinion and > have listened to both sides of the argument for a > long time now. The way I see it is it?s doesn?t only have 2 sides nor is it an argument.

Can?t help but notice that since Ted?s brilliant contribution there haven?t been any more drawings in here.

And why is it slower on Friday afternoons...

Declan Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > We are born alone... No we aren't. At least one other person has to be around.

louisiana Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If you're already decided that he doesn't exist, > you might like to join the group of atheists > performing Thriller on and around the 4th plinth > Sunday 3.50-5pm. You see this is what I find interesting. You are so sure of what you aren't believing in you even use a personal pronoun for it just like the people who do believe do.

silverfox Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- ... what caused > the Big Bang, ie, the pre-existing conditions > which allowed the point of singularity to spark > into existence, create all the matter/anti-matter > and elements which form our universe. Isn?t the idea that time started with the big bang so there wasn?t any ?before??

Oh and by the way I'm not in any way trying to argue for the existence of god just against the existence of definites. I think too much importance is put on the question of whether ?God? exists for people to actually explore the questions of, what the fuck is going on? and, why do we all think that way?

Which laws of physics are we talking about here? The ones that we are familiar with in our day-to-day lives do not apply in all s tuations. In the bit of the world that we inhabit every action has an equal and opposite reaction and something cannot be in more than one place at a time but that doesn?t mean that every action has an equal and opposite reaction and something cannot be in more than one place at a time.

That's not mud.

mockney piers Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > I'm also curious as to how Jeremys assertion that > the existence of god, a metaphysical concept at > best, is a physical impossibility? Not just that but we don?t really know what the limits of physical possibility actually are. If indeed there are any. The best you can say is that something is physically improbable to the best of our current knowledge.

I don?t mean to sound contrary but it is a stupid question in the first place. The actual question is more like, why do we feel the need to somehow believe in something even if what you?re believing in is your actual act of not believing? A less one dimensional journey would perhaps be exploring how the innate and universally shared human sense of something supernatural is interpreted by different people and how it has developed in western culture into what we now commonly perceive as God.

Well those last 2 decisions Oom Rudi just gave are a fine example of, ?I?ll say if he?s out or not and don?t talk back to me sonny boy. And another thing, spit that dam gum out you are not a dockyard hooker.? All the better for it too as Australia are 203-8 at lunch.

Give me any guitar and I'll make it sound rubbish.

One word, "Onions"

The librarian blew him?

Why?

In the interest of debate. Would any ladies like to comment on which of these guitars would make you more inclined to sleep with the player? Assuming it was the same person playing the same song the same way. A- http://mos.musicradar.com/images/Guitarist/Issue%20309/gibson/gibson-les-paul-2008-460-80.jpg or B - http://www1.mipa-award.de/2008/winner/e-guitar_fender_american_standard_stratocaster.jpg I?ve used a Les Paul and a Strat because let?s face it they are the guitars that we picture when people mention Gibson or Fender.