Huguenot, Ok perhaps I was being a bit hot headed but the tone of that article really got to me. Not because of any specific political affiliation, I am perfectly aware of the effects the ?troubles? had on all sides and don?t have any personal affiliation either way. But it attacked a sentiment held by people who (from what I can make out) the author is not a contemporary. For example I could just as easily write a scathing commentary on the sentiment expressed in Cry Freedom and back it up with tales of personal tragedy and the crimes committed in the name of liberation. I wouldn?t though, because as a rational adult I realise that there are more than two sides to every story, I know that sentiment does not always reflect the outcome of something and I respect the feelings of other people. To me it seems that the author was merely trying to absolve himself of a misplaced sense of latent, liberal guilt that he shouldn?t really be feeling in the first place.