Brendan

You want to watch yourself with the gas. What with not being able to see and everything.

Yeah. They can use email or twitter. And Gareth from Birmingham says?, ?It?s a disgrace. The taxpayer funds global warming through the recession and this is how the government repays us. I know where my vote is going when I get home from Faliraki.?

Constantly but not by this. Not until we get a party leader with some decent charlies. Nope. Unedifying, self promotion and political non-speak.

Bloody Icelandishers. They use their volcanoes to heat their homes and generate electricity. It?s wouldn?t be a massive leap to start using them as international weapons is all I?m saying. They?ll probably claim that it?s carbon neutral and all? Bastards.

Sounds like moving back to South Africa.

Oh I know you can. It?s Surrey I?m worried about.

TheAllSeeingEye Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If its not illegal it should be, a legal loophole > in my opinion. It isnt your property so you should > have no rights to be there unless paying an amount > set by the owner/landlord. Access to housing is a right not a privilege. As far as I?m concerned that point is not up for debate. How you provide that housing is another matter which is. But if people end up having to squat it is just an indication that something isn?t working.

I don?t feel I should have to stop slagging off the English just because I live here and my wife, best friends, cousins, uncles, aunts etc are English. Ridiculous! It just gives me more ammunition.

Yeah I spend every summer with my in-laws in Turkey.

I think you may all be wrong. Wikipedia says this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_overseas_territories#Citizenship

Perhaps now but if you take the 200 year history of the relationship between the 2 countries. Anyway I wasn?t really invoking scientific research just expressing my opinion based on experience. In South Africa I come across a lot more Brits than I do South Africans in England. Although this may have something to do with me avoiding South Africans in England. Anyway insulting poms isn?t really being insulting. You?re fair game whether I?m here or you?re there or we?re both in Australia. The propensity for people to slag off the countries they?re living in is really quite amazing sometimes. It?s the daily hobby of invasive British people living all over the Mediterranean. Perhaps the most bizarre I have heard though is my Rhodesian aunty, who has been living in England for about 20 years and has had her brain addled by over exposure to the Daily Mail, digging her allotment patch and going on about bloody foreigners. And I fail to see what any of this has to do with the Falklands.

It is my understanding that the right to a dropped kerb was enshrined in Magna Carta in the 13th century but stolen from the common man by Thatcher during the rise of Postmodern British Fascism in the late Space-Age along with traditional pint pots and white dog poo. But then some people will believe any old shit.

Just think, he could be just as much of a pain in the arse as I am if he did.

Meh, there are plenty more Brits living in mine and slagging it off. Few of them very keen to come back to Blighty though. So go figure ?ey. I can merrily take your jobs, ruin your women for you and insult you left right and centre whilst enjoying the benefit of pouring my life work into your economy but the Falkland sheep farmer, all be he plumy of voice and lacking in the chin department doesn?t enjoy citizenship.

So they don?t get British citizenship? I didn?t know that. That is a bit of a piss take. Subject to her majesty but not granted citizenship of the country. It?s no wonder the international consensus is that you?re generally bastards.

Looks like Pimlico/Victoria or maybe Nine Elms. Don't know what they're building though.

Well that's us fucked then.

Today's Indy cartoon: sums it up quite well.

Surely the very existence of the benefit system shows that society needs to be more equal? I will assume that we would both agree that any benefit system should only be there to protect the vulnerable. So what we have in the uk are entire swathes of the population reliant on the benefit system to provide them with housing and income to feed and clothe their families. If society was more equal a working family (let?s use our bin man as an example again) shouldn?t have to rely on the state for support because housing and food and stuff etc would be attainable on his income.

DaveR Wrote: ------------------------------------------------------- > If, like me, you are broadly uncomcerned about > that gap, So either broadly unaware of/unaffected by the scale of human suffering and indignity going on around you or broadly unconcerned about it? But for fucks sake don?t try to pass it off as some sort of valid political stance.

It looks like an electric shaver. Not surprising as the precedent to build skyscrapers in the shape of battery powered personal electronics has already been set. Give it a decade and the aerial view of London should resemble an overflowing toiletry bag.

At first glance I thought this may be something for the ?Wanted? section.

You could say the same thing about the channel islands.

.

Now trump may have a point. They could well be a sinister organisation hell-bent on ripping society asunder for their own personal gain trough the devious method of subversive poster positioning. I hear their headquarters are in a secret volcano lair somewhere in Penge.