Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The idea that we'll get better trading terms after we leave is ridiculous, regardless of the balance of trade. The best possible post Brexit outcome would be to retain much of our preferential access to the single market, which would mean continuing contributions to the eU budget and abiding by most Eu regulations. So in other words, things would remain much as they are now, eccept we would have no influence over Eu policies and no voting rights. Any better deal would put the eus own members at a competitive disadvantage and reward (thereby encouraging further) exits. It's not going to happen.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheArtfulDogger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Percentage often hides the real numbers

> >

> > What is the actual amount in pounds shillings

> and

> > pence

> >

> > 8% of a billion, for example us a lot more than

> 44% of ten thousand, therefore don't quote

> > percentages but real monetary terms ..

> >

> > There are lies, damn lies and statistics

>

> Quite often I'd agree, but in this case the

> percentages are the more pertinent as they show

> the effect on each economy.

>

> Put it this way, if trade between the UK and the

> EU stopped tomorrow, which economy would be far,

> far more effected?



Ireland's


There's not an EU economy as a single entity Loz your comparison is meaningless

malumbu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

...

>

> So much of what has been raised in the debate has

> nowt to do with the EU and is dependent on

> domestic politics. The main reason the last lot

> delivered anything on the environment was due to

> the Lib Dems, now they have gone.....

> ...


Environmental protection is (rightly so) quite high up on EU agenda:


http://ec.europa.eu/environment/basics/home_en.htm

http://ec.europa.eu/environment/legal/implementation_en.htm



Then you get the likes of Farage:


Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheArtfulDogger Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Percentage often hides the real numbers

> >

> > What is the actual amount in pounds shillings

> and

> > pence

> >

> > 8% of a billion, for example us a lot more than

> 44% of ten thousand, therefore don't quote

> > percentages but real monetary terms ..

> >

> > There are lies, damn lies and statistics

>

> Quite often I'd agree, but in this case the

> percentages are the more pertinent as they show

> the effect on each economy.

>

> Put it this way, if trade between the UK and the

> EU stopped tomorrow, which economy would be far,

> far more effected?


Taken from the governments own website, www.uktradeinfo.com


"EU Exports for March 2016 were ?12.0 billion. This was an increase of ?0.6 billion (5.7 per cent) compared with last month, and a rise of ?0.1 billion (0.6 per cent) compared with March 2015.


EU Imports for March 2016 were ?20.2 billion. This was an increase of ?0.8 billion (4.1 per cent) compared with last month, and a rise of ?0.1 billion (0.5 per cent) compared with March 2015.


In EU trade the UK was a net importer this month, with imports exceeding exports by ?8.2 billion.


The proportion of total exports to the EU was 48 per cent in March 2016. Over the past 18 months, this has ranged from 38 per cent to 48 per cent. The proportion of total imports from the EU was 51 per cent in March 2016. Over the same period, this has ranged between 51 per cent and 55 per cent."



Therefore as mentioned bandishing a percentages for a larger body (the EU) compared with a smaller body (the UK) isn't a valid statistic 🤔


Nice try but no cigar Loz (not even an imported EU one ! )

I m not English but have been living in this country long enough to understand that leaving Europe will be plenty of risks for You and none of this risks are worth taking...

It might be better for You or not but why taking the risks??

One above the others: Do You realise if the LEAVE campaign wins You might have Boris as a prime minister??

Hope You realise that and the consequences...:)

pato Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I m not English but have been living in this

> country long enough to understand that leaving

> Europe will be plenty of risks for You and none of

> this risks are worth taking...

> It might be better for You or not but why taking

> the risks??

> One above the others: Do You realise if the LEAVE

> campaign wins You might have Boris as a prime

> minister??

> Hope You realise that and the consequences...:)


pato, this has nothing to do with risks. This is purely about Nationalistic sentiments and nostalgia/delusions of glorious days of empire. You know ...."Ruuuuule Brittania, tra la la la la"

TheArtfulDogger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Therefore as mentioned bandishing a percentages for a larger body (the EU) compared with a smaller

> body (the UK) isn't a valid statistic

>

> Nice try but no cigar Loz (not even an imported EU one ! )


For reasons explained, of course it is meaningful. In fact, hard numbers in this case are meaningless as it won't show effect.


Think of it this way. Two people lose ?100,000 each in a failed business venture. One is an average person with a mortgage and a few quid in the bank, the other is Bill Gates. Does the hard monetary figure really explain the actual effect on each person, or would a percentage of their total worth be far more illuminating?


It's the same here - the monetary figures you are quoting don't show the effect on each economy. Your figures are, essentially, meaningless. And that's a quality, British built meaningless!

pato Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I m not English but have been living in this country long enough to understand that leaving

> Europe will be plenty of risks for You and none of this risks are worth taking...

>

> It might be better for You or not but why taking the risks??


Or, more succinctly put...


file.php?20,file=221379

Getting very sick of some media outlets and people on social media implying that leaning towards voting to leave automatically means you're a racist or xenophobe. Because seemingly there couldn't possibly be any other reason that might be a valid consideration for such a huge economic, political, and social decision.


The level of ignorance required for this viewpoint is only eclipsed by the racists themselves.

TheCat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Getting very sick of some media outlets and people

> on social media implying that leaning towards

> voting to leave automatically means you're a

> racist or xenophobe. Because seemingly there

> couldn't possibly be any other reason that might

> be a valid consideration for such a huge economic,

> political, and social decision.

> ...


Actually you summed it up. The only reasons to leave the EU are racist and xenophobic. The delusion that by virtue of being English you are better than everyone else and Europe and the rest of the world will crawl to you on their knees begging to be invited to your birthday party. The delusion that your kids and grandkids will have more opportunities growing up on this island (well, part of one after Scotland and Wales secede) instead of part of a 500 million strong and culturally and economically diverse continent.


Other reasons do exist, such as being a total troglodyte who doesn't like European constraints such as environmental policies whose long term sustainability a free market or local short term gains don't guarantee.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Being in the E.U is like a bird inside an egg..

>

> You need to crack that shell and find out was is

> on the outside..

>

> Get out.. Take control.. Have some say..

>

> DulwichFox


Bring on the glorious 12th, where we get to shoot the first birds of the season

I haven't heard a convincing economic argument for Brexit. The idea that we'll get a better deal following a vote to leave, (that all 27 member states will agree to our re-entering the single market, with full access, but exempted from the regulations which govern it) really does strike me as deluded.


On immigration there are some more reasoned arguments (although I disagree with them). It is self-evident that free movement goes hand in hand with membership of a single market and if you think this a bad thing then maybe one could consider the economic pain worth it, to restrict movement in and out of Europe.


Of course this completely negates the benefits UK citizens get from free movement, the fact that 1.2 million people born in the UK live in other EU countries and that we all have the opportunity to travel and work anywhere within the EU. But again, I can see that some might consider this worth losing if they feel strongly enough about immigration in.


Personally though, I take issue with the whole premise that immigration is a problem. The view that immigration is straining public services seems to ignore the fact that the NHS is kept afloat by immigrant labour (by doctors and nurses from overseas), and that, as a net contributor to the economy, helps fund public services in the first place. The truth is that the level of public service provision is a matter of public policy. Moves to cut immigration and pull out of the single market are very unlikely to lead to better public services in my opinion. Neither is it plausible that Gove and Boris are truly advocating investing heavily in the public sector with or without Brexit, which just makes their claims on the topic incredibly cynical.


But even if you are ?anti immigration?, it is by no means a given that post-Brexit, immigration levels will come down significantly. The claim often made, that it is the EU which is preventing immigration coming down to the 'tens of thousands' is not true. The majority of immigration to the UK comes from outside the EU (which is entirely within our control) and is itself in the hundreds of thousands.


Personally, I just haven?t heard an argument which convinces me we will benefit from ?Brexit?.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I haven't heard a convincing economic argument for

> Brexit.


I dont think that's an unreasonable comment, both sides have made a shambles of presenting a competent economic argument. For what it's worth, as a Leaver, my own thoughts on economics are this....


Having plenty of time on my hands, I've read the 90 page PwC report on the economic impact, and the IMF report as well. My simple takeaway is that the longer term economic impact is negligible and within the margin of forecasting error. All reports I've seen say GDP will be somewhere between 0.5% and 3% worse by ~2030 under a brexit scenario. On a 15 year forecast, in my view, these numbers are less than rounding errors with so many variables. Yes, some areas of the economy will suffer, and others will do better, but the overall impact to my mind is a wash. Also, I do concede that the shorter term uncertainty means there will likely be a slow down, possibly even a recession, in the immediate few years after brexit, from which we will recover and accelerate back towards the pre-brexit growth path in the ensuing years. Im making this decision based on the long term/once in a generation argument, hence the economic impact of brexit I dont think is a key differentiator to my decision.


Also, having the ability to be able to better forecast population and demographics, will hopefully mean that our economlic forecasts can improve in accuracy themselves...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Today I learned that living in a 5 bedroom, £2m+ house in Dulwich is basically like being in prison. Honestly, CPR Dave is the finest-crafted persona on the forum. He never fails to suck people in - I fall for it every time. It's top quality trolling (in the original sense of the word). From the Subtle Art of Trolling: troll v.,n. To utter a posting on Usenet designed to attract predictable responses or flames. Derives from the phrase "trolling for newbies"; which in turn comes from mainstream "trolling";, a style of fishing in which one trails bait through a likely spot hoping for a bite. The well-constructed troll is a post that induces lots of newbies and flamers to make themselves look even more clueless than they already do, while subtly conveying to the more savvy and experienced that it is in fact a deliberate troll. If you don't fall for the joke, you get to be in on it. https://www.urban75.com/Mag/troll.html
    • It always amazes me how unwilling people are to pay tax. On anything. We have an amazing free at the point of use health service. We have other free at the point of use public services. Why should we not pay tax? Where else would the money come from? The Tories promised to reduce income tax (and subsequently did) in order to get elected.  It was all downhill from there, in my opinion.  Not that I know much about either economics or politics, so do feel free to explain to me the errors in my thinking. Re people living in big houses after their life situation changes, that saying about criticism and walking in someone else's moccasins springs to mind. At least, it would if I could remember exactly what it was 🤣
    • What do you all think we younger people have had to do for years if we can't afford the rent or to buy in our area?   We move AND we don't get to trouser £2M of unearned housing wealth in the process.   I no longer live where I grew up as I could not afford to stay there, same for my partner. Of course if you are unfortunate enough own a £2m house in East Dulwich,  the good news is there are plenty of houses and flats that cost considerably less than £2m so someone keen to avoid the £2m houe tax could move  and stay in the area.
    • If you are in your eighties and you now live on your own in a £2m house that you bought for £63,000 in 1968 then of course you are entitled to live there as long as you can physically do so.  But I also like to think of a local dad I know, a teacher, who lives with his wife and kids in a modern two bed flat in SE22 that they part-own (thanks to a contribution from wife's parents).  The dad goes running in Dulwich Park every morning first thing, and told me wistfully how he sometimes looks out at all these huge unused gardens with rusting trampolines and empty bedrooms and wonders how the world came to this. There's a brilliant way to avoid IHT.  It's called "give it away while you are still alive - keeping £650k + your annuity/company pension to see you through your final years".  If I have a £2m house and don't want to move or incur IHT, then there's the option of taking out a loan against the value of the house and living off that till I pop my clogs.  It's not always the most financially efficient thing to do, but as they say, you can't take it with you.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...