Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Terrible news. Sympathy and support goes out to her family, especially the little ones who have sadly lost their mother at such a tender age. As yet no news on what the motivations of this individual were, so perhaps for now as a forum we should steer clear of anything political, out of respect and decency.


Louisa.

Made me feel ill. Both her and her husband have devoted themselves to public service working until very recent,y for Oxfam and Save the Children charities respectively. What a horrific loss. I'm so very saddened for her children. I can't think about their loss without shedding tears.

Cameron was predictably patronising and damn right rude tonight. He didn't address immigration once. And why with Corbyn saying on Andrew Marr this morning that we have no control over immigration inside the EU (truthful at least), the PM and Leader of Opposition have done the job for the leave camp today by just opening their mouths. Thanks.


Louisa.

Indeed Blah, 'the heir to Blair' once again proving himself to be a career minded political machine, reading from a memorised script. The man really is just too good at shouting people down with passive aggressive pomposity, I don't think he even knows he's doing it half the time.


Louisa.

You are bang on with pompous. That's what seems to aggravate people most. I've watched QT now and didn't think he was too bad, esp on points around the three main lies of the leave campaign. Where he fell apart a little is when pressed by Dimbleby on things he was trying to brush off as irrelevant.


I think that the problem with all of these tv debates is that the arguments are so polarised that those who have made their mind up one way or the other aren't really listening anymore. So the fight is for the undecideds. Those are the people that should be making up these studio audiences. Otherwise it's just a repeat of the same merry-go-round of argument. Both sides seem completely unable to deviate from that.


Will be glad when it's over, but if the difference is narrow between the two sides, I think it won't go away.

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Cameron was predictably patronising and damn right

> rude tonight. He didn't address immigration once.

> And why with Corbyn saying on Andrew Marr this

> morning that we have no control over immigration

> inside the EU (truthful at least), the PM and

> Leader of Opposition have done the job for the

> leave camp today by just opening their mouths.

> Thanks.

>

> Louisa.


As they said at the time - Corbyn's the Leave spy in the

Remain camp. Felt the word inept was a little unfair :)


His heart so obviously isn't in it - He just had to not

answer much on immigration..

To be fair to Cameron (and you won't hear me say that often), he had a much harder time of it from the audience than Michael Gove got. Even remainers were taking shots at hos government's austerity policies, so he had it from all sides, and looked more ruffled than I've possibly ever seen him.


And again I feel so pissed off with top Labour figures. Where the fuck have they been?

According the polls., Remain has pulled narrowly ahead in most and at worst drawn even. Most of the polling was done before Jo Cox's death so the surge for Remain can only be partly attributable to that.


Louisa, what exactly do you think Cameron needed to address about immigration?


Immigration is 100% an economic positive for the UK. EU immigrants make up 5% of the country. Loads of Brtis have left for Europe as well so the net population change is only a couple million people. They are in work and contributing tax as well as providing vital skills the country needs to continue growing and providing public services, particularly the NHS in which immigrants play a huge role.


Most EU immigrants are in London, where most people are pro-Remain because they are best placed to see the advantages (economic and cultural) of EU migration. The supposedly lower skilled immigrants from Eastern Europe make up less than half of total EU immigrants and are too small a population to have had any widespread impact on most working class people.


Continuing to pander to the misinformation and paranoia in my view only legitimizes EU immigration concerns driven by fear rather than reality. The lies about Turkey and Middle Eastern countries joining the EU as a means to stoke bad feeling is for me beyond the pale.


The Leave campaign really should focus on articulating the advantages of leaving the EU and why its worth paying the economic price it will entail (I still have no clear vision of this).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi, I went to the council's planning portal to look at the application, and I encourage others to look at it. It looks like a pleasant building, with thoughtful landscaping. as Pugwash said, the big oak would be retained, only two smaller trees are supposed to be cut, one of which is already dead according to the Tree Survey. It sounds like 38 people in great need of it will gain supported housing thanks to this development, a very positive change. Of course a solution has to be found for the 3 who will need to find other accommodation during the works, but that doesn't seem enough of a reason to oppose the development. The current building is 4 stories, so I would be surprised if one extra storey was considered objectionable, especially considering the big oak stands between the building and the neighbours' back gardens and the fact that the neighbours it's backing onto are all 5 stories houses themselves or only have blank walls facing the building. In the context where affordable housing is sorely missing, a 100% supported housing development is great news. Personally I've never seen a less objectionable planning request
    • I also wonder if all this, recently events and so many u turns is going to also be the end of Kier Starmer.
    • And I replied: Mandelson and Trump have much in common. They are both shallow, vulgar and vain. They both fetishise wealth and power, irrespective of who holds it or how it was accumulated. They were both close friends and associates of the late Jeffrey Epstein and have moved in the same circles, as Ghislaine Maxwell’s address book allegedly confirms. Recognising another who is utterly transactional and lacking in a moral compass, there’s every chance of “Petie” fitting right in Mar-a-Largo. That Starmer couldn’t anticipate that Mandelson’s past behaviour would be problematic just proves how inept this government is.
    • Can't agree with that because he is a superb communicator - a really smart and  smooth talker. He studied PPE at Oxford and was communications director for Labour for many years.  Setting aside the "minor"  indiscretions during his time in government he has all the smoothness and ability to flatter Trump without appearing obsequious. Plus he can manage and exploit  Trump’s ego. He is highly polished socially, comfortable in elite circles, skilled at making personal connections. He can flatter and disarm, which is a useful tactic with Trump, who responds well to personal respect and praise. As a former EU Trade Commissioner and Cabinet minister, Mandelson understands international relations, trade, and diplomacy. He knows how to frame issues in terms of “wins” that Trump could claim credit for. I honestly hope that he survives.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...