Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all


I am thinking of getting one of these but having looked at them on Ebay I'm finding it very confusing!


They seem really long - 30-40cm. Do people find their babies pull on them as they are the right length to be grabbed onto? Are they safe to be kept on 24 hours?


Also, how do you know what you are buying is amber and not some rubbish?


Any tips would be very much appreciated. Many thanks in advance xxx

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/10082-teething-and-amber-necklaces/
Share on other sites

glad you asked Ko - am in the same boat. i think i saw a previous thread where mums recommended taking the necklace off at sleep times but maybe someone has another tip? i am also concerned about fakes. any recommendation for a reputable seller would be great.

EBAYThe necklaces are actually quite short, the babies are unable to pull at them, they tend to fall down their back anyway rather than their front.


You are supposed to remove it at night but I keep my son's on 24 hours but we co sleep so there is no risk of anything happening to him. Some parents tie the necklaces around their babies ankles at night etc in order to keep the amber necklace warm as the healing properties are supposably in the resin which worked when warmed up.


You need to make sure it is baltic amber, the best. I got mine from ebay , he does pure baltic amber necklaces. Another tip, make sure the beads are rounded in order not to leave imprints on the baby's neck.

Baby C has slept in hers from about 4 months old. We never take it off, I didn't even know she was teething when she got her first 2 teeth! No idea if it is the Amber, but think it looks pretty if nothing else.


I know of two suppliers who seem fibe, will post details later when on my PC.


Molly

Retailers;


These people have some lovely ones, I like the one that has all the different colours of amber on it, graduated through from light to dark, though it is often out of stock...

http://www.amberstyle.co.uk/category/8/page2


I got mine from this seller on ebay;

Seller: blueskyairways

There is a listing on there now from the same person;

http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/WeeRascals-Baltic-Amber-Teething-Necklace-Honey-Dark_W0QQitemZ260542901037QQcmdZViewItemQQptZUK_Baby_Baby_Feeding_Dummies_Pacifiers_Teething_Aids?hash=item3ca9912b2d


The beads are not perfectly round on my daughter's necklace, more rough shapes, but with smooth edges, and each necklace was in a different shade of amber. I've been very happy with them and it has never bothered her at all.


Hope this helps.


Molly

And knotted between each bead so even if broken only 1 bead comes off.


I took it off initially but after seeing her wear it for long enough to know it was fine left it on full time. As H says too short to bite (not how they work). I just applied common sense, I wear a short necklace in bed and it has never ever bothered me, so why would this on a baby. The way they work they can't twist or anything.


Molly

Theory is that the amber warms against the skin and gives off tiny amounts of something(very techy me!) that eases teething pain.


The websites that sell them explain it better.


I wasn't convinced but have to say C hasn't appeared to suffer like O did so I do think there is something in it.


I only discovered them when O was about 2 Sillywoman, was very sad not to have known about them for her too, thank goodness I got my baby C in the end!!!


Molly

Got mine from this place. must admit we gave up using our's for a bit as wasn't sure was making a difference but have recently started again, think in retrospect what we put down to teething was just general temperament...but is def teething again, waves of pain resulting in not much sleep for any of us!


http://www.myriadonline.co.uk/wooden-felt-rattles.php[/url]

They're very much the norm in France and Switzerland, so much so that my French friend asked where our little boy's necklace was when we visited her, as he wasn't wearing one at the time. I think of it as being a bit like those copper bracelets people wear for rheumatism. And teething is so awful, i take the view that anything is worth a try, so what if it's rubbish - doesn't do any harm to try.

Well said Belle,


each bead is smaller than an average pea, and the necklace clasp is designed to break under very little pressure. I am sure that if a child had ever been hurt through wearing one of these it would be all over the Internet for us all to read.


But we live in a world where you hear of parents drying each item baby eats with on an individual piece of paper towel, or not letting little ones crawl around in public places for fear of germs. As Sillywoman says each to their own, I am happy with my choices.


Molly

Hi Linzkg,


Yes, just keep an eye on him - can't recall which one you have, but the ones with bells on are not quite as strong as the other ones. The Breast Buddies ones are really strong, tested to very great strength so don't think he'd break one of those.


Glad he likes it!


Molly

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Thank you, I will be vigilant
    • @Sue said: nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? This is the point. Adults are meant to teach their children by example. It sounds as though the adult guardian/ father in this case did not react appropriately. Had a truly sincere apology been given,  I suspect the OP would not have posted on here. It is possible the OP snapped in the heat of the moment, but they were possibly startled because they were hit from behind? If we are startled it can be instinctive to initially react with anger. I also agree that it would be highly irresponsible to let any very young child ride or walk or do anything on a busy public street without supervision- most of all to protect the child. If in this case the child was out of the adult's line of sight that is perhaps another indication that the father needs a refresh in appropriate behaviour around a child, as well as his manners.
    • Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...