Jump to content

Gigantic 'pots' of Honey. Please read update


Recommended Posts

For the really serious honey obsessive, normal people can look away now.


My ED bees have been relocated to Cornwall where they forage wild flower honey. The 2015 harvest of raw honey is in 50-60lb tubs where it has now naturally set as all honey does eventually. It can be warmed gently and will become liquid again, but as is, if anyone out there has a worrying honey habit they could buy a whole tub at ?3.50 a lb.

Perhaps a Honey Addicts Anonymous group would like to share??


UPDATE

Well thanks ED for such a positive response, but then it is straight from the hive good stuff.

Now the deal here is whilst happily taking on board the time expense and near death experience of anaphylactic hospitalization, for the avoidance of warming, jars, labels and stickyness, I am selling a complete tub at the wholesale price of ?3.50 lb.

The honey has set and until gently warmed will not pour into a jar but if anybody out there wants to organise a share out, I'm sure you will all be really pleased.


Later in the year I will sell 2016 liquid honey in lb jars for ?6 if the bees are willing and anyone is interested


UPDATE 10th May

To avoid further confusion, oneearth121, who has posted on this thread, has bought a tub of honey and has been willing to share so you all need to contact him for just a few pots.Enjoy!

  • 3 weeks later...

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Latest Discussions

    • Depends on what the Barista says doesnt it? There was no physical confrontation with the driver, OP thinks she is being targetted when she isnt. These guys work min wage under strict schedules so give them a break unless they damage your stuff
    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...