Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've voting Sadiq for my second vote. Have yet to decide my first (which has, for me, always gone to a minor party) but it will probably be the Lib Dem. The rest from the minors seem like the usual bunch of nutters.


Six months ago, Goldsmith had a slight edge for me, but he's really done nothing to impress me since then.

This time last year I said Khan was "an embarrassment of vacuous sloganing and fake sincerity that was truly sickening" and haven't changed my mind; Posho is so dim and so obviously being worked by others you can see the strings, I shall probs vote Sian Berry and the mad Polish Prince as a back-up (anyone who challenges Farage to a duel can't be all mbad).

Well you could consider our local candidate - Caroline Pidgeon. She lives in ED and was a Southwark councillor before she became a GLA member, which she's been for 8 years now.

Unlike Khan and Goldsmith, who've just been parachuted in to stand by the big parties, she knows what the GLA is about - and Southwark too, obv - and knows exactly how the system works.

Her manifesto is here (scroll down the page once you get there)

http://www.markpack.org.uk/138648/caroline-pidgeon-london-mayor-lib-dem-manifesto/

Polish Prince gets my vote


If Caroline Pidgeon actually wears a 'Pidgeon' costume, I'll vote for her


Mind you Sian could out-do her and turn up as a 'berry' of some kind, probably a strawberry, then I'd say say 'The Pidge' is in trouble



Bloody hell, now I'm way more interested in the whole thing

Townleygreen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well you could consider our local candidate -

> Caroline Pidgeon. She lives in ED and was a

> Southwark councillor before she became a GLA

> member, which she's been for 8 years now.

> Unlike Khan and Goldsmith, who've just been

> parachuted in to stand by the big parties, she

> knows what the GLA is about - and Southwark too,

> obv - and knows exactly how the system works.



...and she's a LibDem. By her own admission she's a LibDem. I like a laugh in local politics but really.


Snappy ad at the bottom of your link -


"Now available to pre-order: Nick Clegg's Politics - The Art of the Possible in an Age of Unreason..."


Don't all rush at once... bless.

So you didn't see the photo of Zac with the same extremist Cameron told us Sadiq was pals with yesterday? You see, community leaders (who may or may not be part of extreme versions of a religion) tend to be very good at getting the ear of people in public office, which is why both Sadiq (in his job as a civil rights lawyer) and Zac (in his role as a politician) have both crossed paths with people we now know to have extreme views. Not a story for me but we all know what side of the political fence you stand on Uncle. I have news for you though. Khan is 10 points ahead, helped massively by the Tory claims of 'terrorist sympathiser', because most people see through that for the nonsense it actually is.
Yeah, I'm not that impressed by Sadiq Khan, but Goldsmith's tactics have made pretty sure I'll vote for him. I think the attempts to imply that Sadiq Khan (who has campaigned against extremism, defied death threats to vote for same-sex marriage and stated publicly that he considers himself a feminist) is somehow allied with radical islamists is patently absurd and horribly cynical.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
    • I'd quit this thread, let those who just want to slag Labour off have their own thread.  Your views on the economy are worth debating.  I'm just stunned how there wasn't this level of noise with the last government.  I could try to get some dirt on Badenoch but she is pointless  Whilst I am not a fan of the Daily Mirror at least there is some respite from Labour bashing. https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/grenfell-hillsborough-families-make-powerful-36175862 https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/politics/nigel-farage-facing-parliamentary-investigation-36188612  
    • That is a bit cake and eat it tho, isn’t it?    At what point do we stop respecting other people’s opinions and beliefs  because history shows us we sometimes simply have no other choice  you are holding some comfort blanket that allows you to believe we are all equal and all valid and we can simply voice different options - without that ever  impacting on the real world  Were the racists we fought in previous generations different? Were their beliefs patronised by the elites of the time? Or do we learn lessons and avoid mistakes of the past?   racists/bigots having “just as much to say” is both true and yet, a thing we have learnt from the past. The lesson was not “ooh let’s hear them out. They sound interesting and valid and as worthy of an audience as people who hold the opposite opinion” 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...