Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Southwark did sell off a lot of the DKH... including the whole block over the Cost Cutter, and the derelict building on the corner of Bromar/Pytchley Rd (where five upmarket-ish houses now stand). But to be fair they're also using some of the empty space to build new council flats too.

Yes Alice

Okay rendelharris, fascism- synonyms- authoritarian, totalitarian, dictatorial, despotic, draconian, autocratic, Nazi, undemocratic, anti-democratic, illiberal, extreme/far right-wing, rightist, militarist

apart from the 'right-wing' words the rest are correct descriptions of the aims of the Left- fyi the WRP back in the 1970s were planning to set up a Worker's Militia- yes a Militia....so even the militarist synonym is correct. AND the WRP were going to lock up alcoholics and drug addicts because they reckoned that under their governance people would not need drugs or alcohol...

If you Wiki Nazism and replaced all the words appertaining to Jews or races that the Nazis viewed as inferior, with 'rich people or 'aristocracy'- it would read something akin to the far left views and aims

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> If you Wiki Nazism and replaced all the words

> appertaining to Jews or races that the Nazis

> viewed as inferior, with 'rich people or

> 'aristocracy'- it would read something akin to the

> far left views and aims


So you believe that those on the far left want to round up the rich and the aristocracy and send them to extermination camps? Tell me, doesn't the tinfoil hat get a bit warm in this weather?

eddeal1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> southwark council have been selling not only land.

> they have been Selling 100s and 100s and 100s of

> houses and flats through Andrew Roberts auctions

> for Years.and All of you were Sleeping.


Not really. It's been discussed on this forum for at least two years how Southwark's policy under Labour is that any council tenancy which falls vacant and the property is deemed to be worth more than ?300K is to be sold rather than being offered to another tenant.


This is utter madness and can only lead to increased ghettoisation of both rich and poor. We're lucky living in a road in ED that is diverse as there are a number of council houses as well as flats, in addition to private houses and flats. If it were all private, we'd be proper la-di-da...

alice Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yes it is, I know they've got to get a 3rd bedroom

> in to make them saleable but couldn't it be a loft

> room, not visible from the front.



Have you registered an objection to the planing application based on the height and the addition of the top floor?


If not it's not worth complaining on here as the council won't read or take into account this forum.


However good to use the forum to get people to object or support the development.

Yes please make comments on the planning application... it looks like over development to me despite the definite need for some form of works to be done. I'm not looking forward to all the HGVs coming down the street either! It has been bad enough with the construction work on the junction of Upland and Crystal Palace Rd.


The deadline is Thursday, 8 September so you have a couple of weeks yet.

The previous owner of the East Dulwich hotel put in an application for a 3rd story in around 2007. This was objected to by neighbours opposite and adjacent and Southwark turned down the application. The owner appealed to the Planning Commissioner who upheld Southwark's decision so the extra story never went up.


More recently (last year?) an application was made by the owner of another property a few doors down on the same terrace for a 3rd story extension and this was rejected. Hopefully these decisions will bode well for the 3rd story plan being rejected again - I'm in support of any improvement to the existing properties but in keeping with neighbouring properties.

The more people that object the greater the chance the council will properly review the scheme.


I've submitted an objection and will also organise a councillor call-in if officers are minded to grant permission.


Reasons I've given are proposed height and massing - we live in a suburban area and what is proposed isn't. No cycle parking - but that would be easily resolved if the developed funded a BikeHanagar.

A construction management plan would be required as Upland Road pavements have been closed for nearly two years now and this development if it were to proceed should not involve the pavement being closed.


Please do object or offer your support - but get involved.

Two days left to get your objections in


So far 7 people have, 6 of them based on height, materials and overlooking other properties.


If you want to object (or support) then the more people who do the better


As said before the site needs something doing to it, but obviously not the plan as submitted

Presumably if they can't build four three bed houses they'll keep it to two stories and build eight two bed flats, meaning much denser living more pressure on parking etc. I think some of the objections made so far are misconceived.

Two aspects to this application. The actual heigh massing etc - the content of what will be built.

And the other aspect will be how it is built. We've had nearly two years of pavement closures along Upland Road so we need to ensure this application has a condition for a construction management plan. Should be virtually no need to close the pavement.

The council cannot/will not even put right poor work done by its own contractors (see ponding along shops opposite ED Picture House on LL and near to Goodrich School) so I am not surprised it won't always hold outside firms responsible for their actions.
  • 2 weeks later...

I received notification from Southwark council today that the plans have been revised. Namely:

Change of materials on third floor and removal of front balcony;

Removal of bay windows on ground floor;

Use of brickwork on first floor in place of render.


The consultation period has been extended to 1 October.

Interesting, just looked at the updated plans which makes the ground and first floor more in keeping but they still have a new second floor which is out of keeping with the rest of the street


This is what they were proposing http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk/documents/?GetDocument=%7b%7b%7b!6R4K5YZyvkyGo25oSLtxug%3d%3d!%7d%7d%7d


This is the new proposal http://planbuild.southwark.gov.uk/documents/?GetDocument=%7b%7b%7b!DNanE5pqlcqb7JSO38mXWw%3d%3d!%7d%7d%7d


Question is , will the changes be enough to get it approval and will they seek variation of change once the plans are in to revert back to the origional proposal..


Thanks for the update craigy boy

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • So top of Lane. Local Sainsbury, middle Co Op and M and S and bottom Tesco Express…..now everyone should be happy except those that want a Waitrose as well…0h and  don’t forget M and S near ED Station….
    • Direct link to joint statement : https://thehaguegroup.org/meetings-bogota-en/?link_id=2&can_id=2d0a0048aad3d4915e3e761ac87ffe47&source=email-pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogota-breakthrough&email_referrer=email_2819587&email_subject=pi-briefing-no-26-the-bogot_-breakthrough&&   No. 26 | The Bogotá Breakthrough “The era of impunity is over.” That was the message from Bogotá, Colombia, where governments from across the Global South and beyond took the most ambitious coordinated action since Israel’s genocidal assault on Gaza began 21 months ago. Convened by The Hague Group and co-chaired by the governments of Colombia and South Africa, the Emergency Conference on Palestine brought together 30 states for two days of intensive deliberation — and emerged with a concrete, coordinated six-point plan to restrain Israel’s war machine and uphold international law. States took up the call from their host, Colombian President and Progressive International Council Member Gustavo Petro, who had urged them to be “protagonists together.” Twelve governments signed onto the measures immediately. The rest now have a deadline: 20 September 2025, on the eve of the United Nations General Assembly. The unprecedented six measures commit states to:     Prevent military and dual use exports to Israel.     Refuse Israeli weapons transfers at their ports.     Prevent vessels carrying weapons to Israel under their national flags.     Review all public contracts to prevent public institutions and funds from supporting Israel’s illegal occupation.     Pursue justice for international crimes.     Support universal jurisdiction to hold perpetrators accountable. “We came to Bogotá to make history — and we did,” said Colombian President Gustavo Petro. “Together, we have begun the work of ending the era of impunity. These measures show that we will no longer allow international law to be treated as optional, or Palestinian life as disposable.” The measures are not symbolic. They are grounded in binding obligations under international law — including the International Court of Justice’s July 2024 advisory opinion declaring Israel’s occupation unlawful, and September 2024’s UN General Assembly Resolution ES-10/24, which gave states a 12-month deadline to act. UN Special Rapporteur on the situation of human rights in the occupied Palestinian territory Francesca Albanese called them “a momentous step forward.” “The Hague Group was born to advance international law in an era of impunity,” said South Africa’s Foreign Minister, Ronald Lamola. “The measures adopted in Bogotá show that we are serious — and that coordinated state action is possible.” The response from Washington was swift — and revealing. In a threatening statement to journalists, a US State Department spokesperson accused The Hague Group of “seeking to isolate Israel” and warned that the US would “aggressively defend our interests, our military, and our allies, including Israel, from such coordinated legal and diplomatic” actions. But instead of deterring action, the threats have only clarified the stakes. In Bogotá, states did not flinch. They acted — and they invite the world to join them. The deadline for further states to take up the measures is now two months away. And with it, the pressure is mounting for governments across the world — from Brazil to Ireland, Chile to Spain — to match words with action. As Albanese said, “the clock is now ticking for states — from Europe to the Arab world and beyond — to join them.” This is not a moment to observe. It is a moment to act. Share the Joint Statement from Bogotá and popularise the six measures. Write to your elected representative and your government and demand they sign on before 20 September. History was made in Bogotá. Now, it’s up to all of us to ensure it becomes reality, that Palestinian life is not disposable and international law is not optional. The era of impunity is coming to an end. Palestine is not alone. In solidarity, The Progressive International Secretariat  
    • Most countries charge for entry to museums and galleries, often a different rate for locals (tax payers) and foreign nationals. The National Gallery could do this, also places like the Museums in South Kensington, the British Library and other tax-funded institutions. Many cities abroad add a tourist tax to hotel bills. It means tourists help pay for public services.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...