Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That's fair enough Brendan, but libertarianism for me is too tainted by the ideals of a pretty nasty bunch across the pond who have a philosophy of a very selfish (and often pretty self defeating) nature, more often than not backed up with an unhealthy obsession with firearms.

Was Koresh the ultimate libertarian? Possibly, he's certainly a cause c?l?bre for many. I prefer the term liberal, it's less tainted, if a bit wishy-washy ;)

I get your point there MP. I was not taking into consideration the agendas the term is associated with. I was thinking more literally.


For me the term Liberal is also pretty annoying, even though it is the category that I generally fall into when people try to pigeonhole me. It brings to mind images of mollycoddled, first world idealists with their heads so far up their arses they can?t see their own glaring double standards or the damage their good is doing.

Touch? Brendan, and also a very fair point.

I don't really label myself as anything, but at a pinch I'm closest to liberal with decent dashes of socia-lism and very occasional bouts of misanthropy.


Sean, that reminded me of today's swiftian classic (well the closing arguments anyway).


oops, link omitted http://jonswift.blogspot.com/2007/10/glenn-beck-sees-good-side-of-fires-in.html

I've not read her stuff yet but her most recent book The Cleft is on my Xmas wishlist. http://books.guardian.co.uk/reviews/generalfiction/0,,1984239,00.html It's a world first populated by women. Men are a genetic anomaly that appear in increasing numbers and so they things with their 'dangly bits' are banished to the edges of 'civilisation'.

I think that 9/11 was a lot more black and white in the sense of, these are the good guys and these are the bad guys than the hundreds of years of conflict culminating in ?the troubles? was. Therefore it was easier for 9/11 to be packaged as an iconic catastrophe.


She does make a fair point though.


I too have never read any of her stuff but you know, Nobel Prize winning old lady who swears on telly. Sounds interesting. I may get something out next time I'm in the library.

The troubles only really refers to the modern struggle from 68/9ish onwards.

Sorry, just being pedantic; what a surprise.


But your point stands that it's easy to portray 9/11 as a simple "what the bad guys have done to us" affair.

Robert Fisk dared to question this pretty much the following day and was universally savaged (sensitivity not being his strong point) but blowback (a US term not mine, I knew it as something entorely different) has become a pretty accepted concept now. Don't say that just anywhere in the US though, as Stewart Lee discovered when doing stand-up out there.

blowback - why do I think you aren't referring to the Tricky album of the same name MP hmmmmm?


If Gore had been elected would the same event happen and if it did would the same outcome have transpired?


Maybe maybe not - but no doubt in my mind that the over-reaction of the US and the complete spunking (sorry, no better word frankly) of the goodwill generated has been and will continue to be THE major factor in the world's future economic and diplomatic decline...

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/oct/18/

> ethicalliving.ethicalliving

>

> :'(

> :'(

> :'(


What a fatuous article.


Everything we do requires energy - energy use creates a carbon footprint / emissions. Someone else this weekend was recommending we eat up all our food as wasted food decomposes and creates methane gas - another contributor to climate change.


Worrying about the impact on the climate of a glass of whisky, wine or beer is just going too bloody far.

the daily mash tells it like it is


IT'S THE BEHEADINGS I MISS THE MOST, SAYS HOMESICK SAUDI KING


KING Abdullah of Saudi Arabia has revealed that he hates to travel because he misses the daily beheadings in the courtyard of his solid gold palace.


The King, who arrived in London yesterday to complete his purchase of the British Government, said: "Tyranny is marvellous thing, but it bugger to travel with.


"I have to leave behind Rolls Royce toilets and beatings of women. I come to cheap country where women no have to wear large canvas tent."

He added: "Next time I bring Hassan the Royal Swordsman and we do some beheadings in lobby of the Dorchester. Yes?"


The King, a moderniser who is slowly dragging his country into the 11th century, will be welcomed officially by the Queen.


He will then spend the rest of day sitting on a vast silk cushion in the corner of the Throne Room, breaking wind and working his way through a pair of marinated goats.


He will spend Wednesday buying Leeds, Bristol, Gateshead and Barbara Windsor.


Prime Minister Gordon Brown said the King was an honoured guest adding: "You are wise and just and you have the proud genitals of an ox. Please come my lovely friend. See our high-quality killing machines. Fresh today. I give you good price."

The only reasoning for this high profile visit that makes any sense to me, is that it was organised by ultra-blairites towards the end of their days as a stinking booby trap left for brown and his goons; he either has to go through with it and look bad or downgrade/cancel it thus snubbing an important though repugnant ally.


You almost have to respect the creativity if this is the case; whichever way you look at it though, the whole affair reeks.

Hmmmm. This explains why half of Westminster was cordoned off and crawling with cops when I went out for lunch.


You have to feel sorry for Brown, well as far as it is possible to feel sorry for him. His predecessor did leave a lot of right royal cock ups behind for him to deal with.

Indeed there were, but I can't find any sympathy for the fella.


Plus Foot & Mouth was all of his own making when he slashed DEFRA's budgets as chancellor and two of the resultant ditched projects were ..err.. flood defence improvements and an urgently needed sewage system repair in a certain diseases research centre that was flagged as being very vulnerable to a leak should there be a flood.

2 + 2 = ?


(source private eye)

Thank goodness he finally spelled out his dramatic new vision for the sun country

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7079333.stm

For a while there I was labouring (geddit) under the misapprehension that he was just going to trot out the same old crap, populist anti-terror measures, ID cards, nuclear power, that he and his predecessor obsessed over.


My favourite was the modified right to silence which now really means, "I dunnit guv, you've got me good and proper"


Pheweee.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • But it was under our electoral system in 2019! This must be part of the right-wing media conspiracy that did for Corbyn....;-) Corbyn was very closely allied to Unite and Len....
    • Goose Green Ward Panel Meeting   Date: 24th of July 2025, 7pm Location: East Dulwich Picturehouse | 116A Lordship Lane | London SE22 8HD    Safer Neighbourhoods Team (SNT) will be holding a ward panel meeting at East Dulwich Picturehouse on Thursday 24th July 2025 from 7pm. Please come along to talk about the priorities for the community and how local police can help.  
    • Eh? That wasn't "my quote"! If you look at your post above,it is clearly a quote by Rockets! None of us have any  idea what a Corbyn led government during Covid would have been like. But do you seriously think it would have been worse than Johnson's self-serving performance? What you say about the swing of seats away from Labour in 2019 is true. But you have missed my point completely. The fact that Labour under Corbyn got more than ten million votes does not mean that Corbyn was "unelectable", does it? The present electoral system is bonkers, which is why a change is apparently on the cards. Anyway, it is pointless discussing this, because we are going round in circles. As for McCluskey, whatever the truth of that report, I can't see what it has to do with Corbyn?
    • Exactly what I said, that Corbyn's group of univeristy politics far-left back benchers would have been a disaster during Covid if they had won the election. Here you go:  BBC News - Ex-union boss McCluskey took private jet flights arranged by building firm, report finds https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cp3kgg55410o The 2019 result was considered one of the worst in living memory for Labour, not only for big swing of seats away from them but because they lost a large number of the Red-wall seats- generational Labour seats. Why? Because as Alan Johnson put it so succinctly: "Corbyn couldn't lead the working class out of a paper bag"! https://youtu.be/JikhuJjM1VM?si=oHhP6rTq4hqvYyBC
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...