Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That's fair enough Brendan, but libertarianism for me is too tainted by the ideals of a pretty nasty bunch across the pond who have a philosophy of a very selfish (and often pretty self defeating) nature, more often than not backed up with an unhealthy obsession with firearms.

Was Koresh the ultimate libertarian? Possibly, he's certainly a cause c?l?bre for many. I prefer the term liberal, it's less tainted, if a bit wishy-washy ;)

I get your point there MP. I was not taking into consideration the agendas the term is associated with. I was thinking more literally.


For me the term Liberal is also pretty annoying, even though it is the category that I generally fall into when people try to pigeonhole me. It brings to mind images of mollycoddled, first world idealists with their heads so far up their arses they can?t see their own glaring double standards or the damage their good is doing.

Touch? Brendan, and also a very fair point.

I don't really label myself as anything, but at a pinch I'm closest to liberal with decent dashes of socia-lism and very occasional bouts of misanthropy.


Sean, that reminded me of today's swiftian classic (well the closing arguments anyway).


oops, link omitted http://jonswift.blogspot.com/2007/10/glenn-beck-sees-good-side-of-fires-in.html

I've not read her stuff yet but her most recent book The Cleft is on my Xmas wishlist. http://books.guardian.co.uk/reviews/generalfiction/0,,1984239,00.html It's a world first populated by women. Men are a genetic anomaly that appear in increasing numbers and so they things with their 'dangly bits' are banished to the edges of 'civilisation'.

I think that 9/11 was a lot more black and white in the sense of, these are the good guys and these are the bad guys than the hundreds of years of conflict culminating in ?the troubles? was. Therefore it was easier for 9/11 to be packaged as an iconic catastrophe.


She does make a fair point though.


I too have never read any of her stuff but you know, Nobel Prize winning old lady who swears on telly. Sounds interesting. I may get something out next time I'm in the library.

The troubles only really refers to the modern struggle from 68/9ish onwards.

Sorry, just being pedantic; what a surprise.


But your point stands that it's easy to portray 9/11 as a simple "what the bad guys have done to us" affair.

Robert Fisk dared to question this pretty much the following day and was universally savaged (sensitivity not being his strong point) but blowback (a US term not mine, I knew it as something entorely different) has become a pretty accepted concept now. Don't say that just anywhere in the US though, as Stewart Lee discovered when doing stand-up out there.

blowback - why do I think you aren't referring to the Tricky album of the same name MP hmmmmm?


If Gore had been elected would the same event happen and if it did would the same outcome have transpired?


Maybe maybe not - but no doubt in my mind that the over-reaction of the US and the complete spunking (sorry, no better word frankly) of the goodwill generated has been and will continue to be THE major factor in the world's future economic and diplomatic decline...

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/oct/18/

> ethicalliving.ethicalliving

>

> :'(

> :'(

> :'(


What a fatuous article.


Everything we do requires energy - energy use creates a carbon footprint / emissions. Someone else this weekend was recommending we eat up all our food as wasted food decomposes and creates methane gas - another contributor to climate change.


Worrying about the impact on the climate of a glass of whisky, wine or beer is just going too bloody far.

the daily mash tells it like it is


IT'S THE BEHEADINGS I MISS THE MOST, SAYS HOMESICK SAUDI KING


KING Abdullah of Saudi Arabia has revealed that he hates to travel because he misses the daily beheadings in the courtyard of his solid gold palace.


The King, who arrived in London yesterday to complete his purchase of the British Government, said: "Tyranny is marvellous thing, but it bugger to travel with.


"I have to leave behind Rolls Royce toilets and beatings of women. I come to cheap country where women no have to wear large canvas tent."

He added: "Next time I bring Hassan the Royal Swordsman and we do some beheadings in lobby of the Dorchester. Yes?"


The King, a moderniser who is slowly dragging his country into the 11th century, will be welcomed officially by the Queen.


He will then spend the rest of day sitting on a vast silk cushion in the corner of the Throne Room, breaking wind and working his way through a pair of marinated goats.


He will spend Wednesday buying Leeds, Bristol, Gateshead and Barbara Windsor.


Prime Minister Gordon Brown said the King was an honoured guest adding: "You are wise and just and you have the proud genitals of an ox. Please come my lovely friend. See our high-quality killing machines. Fresh today. I give you good price."

The only reasoning for this high profile visit that makes any sense to me, is that it was organised by ultra-blairites towards the end of their days as a stinking booby trap left for brown and his goons; he either has to go through with it and look bad or downgrade/cancel it thus snubbing an important though repugnant ally.


You almost have to respect the creativity if this is the case; whichever way you look at it though, the whole affair reeks.

Hmmmm. This explains why half of Westminster was cordoned off and crawling with cops when I went out for lunch.


You have to feel sorry for Brown, well as far as it is possible to feel sorry for him. His predecessor did leave a lot of right royal cock ups behind for him to deal with.

Indeed there were, but I can't find any sympathy for the fella.


Plus Foot & Mouth was all of his own making when he slashed DEFRA's budgets as chancellor and two of the resultant ditched projects were ..err.. flood defence improvements and an urgently needed sewage system repair in a certain diseases research centre that was flagged as being very vulnerable to a leak should there be a flood.

2 + 2 = ?


(source private eye)

Thank goodness he finally spelled out his dramatic new vision for the sun country

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/7079333.stm

For a while there I was labouring (geddit) under the misapprehension that he was just going to trot out the same old crap, populist anti-terror measures, ID cards, nuclear power, that he and his predecessor obsessed over.


My favourite was the modified right to silence which now really means, "I dunnit guv, you've got me good and proper"


Pheweee.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
    • They are a third of the way through their term Earl. It's no good blaming other people anymore. They only have three years left to fix what is now their own mess. And its not just lies in the manifesto. There were lies at the last budget too, when they said that was it, they weren't coming back for more tax and more borrowing. They'd already blamed the increase in NIC taxes on what they claimed was a thorough investigation. They either knew everything then or they lied about that too .   They need to stop lying and start behaving. If they don't the next government won't be theirs, it will be led by Nigel Farage.  They have to turn it round rapidly. Blaming other people, telling lies and breaking promises isn't going to cut it any more.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...