Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The Appeal Court has refused to recognise an "over the telephone" Muslim marriage, between an autistic British man (who functions at the level of a three year old and is said to be highly suggestible) and a woman in Bangladesh, he has never met. The wedding, under Sharia law, would have enabled his new wife to get a visa and join him in this country. Now, I've heard everything.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But the important question is "would you?"


She looks a whole lot more attractive with ?24.3 million in the bank but I wouldn't touch her with a bargepole not that I've got a bargepole. She is vile.

Jah Lush wrote:She's a deranged old slapper


Not doing too bad for a one legged, strident, deranged old slapper though.

Isn't it time divorce settlements were reconsidered?

Who believes this amount of money can be justified other than Heather?

Wouldn't it be more appropriate for each individual to take out what they put in?

That voice of Thomas the Tank Engine Would seduce even you I'm sure DC, but the man who gave us the frog chorus...even for $25 million, really?


* he he, I toned down my post thrice in the composition, only to see we can always count on *Bob* to lower the tone!! ;) *

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Come on now, Gents.

> Be honest - hand on heart - ?25m for doing Ringo

> up the rotbox. Just once. No kissing. Cash in

> hand.

>

> Anyone who says they wouldn't is a barefaced liar.


Gunnery Sergeant Hartman: I'll bet you're the kind of guy that would fuck a person in the ass and not even have the goddam common courtesy to give him a reach-around. I'll be watching you

Regarding Paul and Heather:



I'm with LizzygotDizzy here - she has been crucified by the media - I'm not a fan of hers, but the level of vilification takes my breath away. It is clear that she is suffering from some mental disorder....so


Has anyone considered that maybe being married to Paul sent Heather off her rocker?

I agree with Keef, rumours of his bullying and unpleasantness to his staff have been making the rounds for years.


Heather Mills does seem to be self-serving and money-grubbing, but no-one deserves the kicking she's had - nor the truly horrible focus on her disability.


And *Bob* - I honestly, honestly wouldn't. (Not that I'm equipped to, but you know what I mean) As Churchill said (to some society bird, sorry forget who:-


- Would you sleep with me for a million pounds?

Society bird - Well, I suppose I would, Mr. Churchill

Winston - Well, then would you sleep with me for one pound?

Society bird *outraged* - Mr Churchill, what sort of woman do you think I am?

Winston - Madam, we have already established what sort of woman you are, now we're haggling.

Just re-read my post, and there's no connection with what Keef said at all. Sorry. What I meant was - yes, she might be rather unwell, and doesn't deserve the treatment she's had. Oh, and Mr. M doesn't seem that nice either.


(goes off muttering something about previewing messages before posting next time..)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There seems to be a change in the reception staff - did not recognise a couple of them when I last visited.  Not sure whether one of the long term staff has retired as not seen her for a while.  Used on line facility as my podiatrist recommended antibiotics for a toe infection and also took photo of my toe which I attached yo my request. Got a message back within a day to say medication ordered from chemist. 
    • Alternatively, here's the whole caboodle. Reference    25/AP/1351 Application Received    Wed 07 May 2025 Application Validated    Wed 14 May 2025 Address    29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Proposal    Installation of a new ATM with associated security camera and light. Status    Granted Decision    Minor - GRANTED Decision Issued Date    Fri 13 Jun 2025 Reference    25/AP/1352 Application Received    Wed 07 May 2025 Application Validated    Wed 14 May 2025 Address    29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Proposal    Installation of a new louvre. Status    Granted Decision    Minor - GRANTED Decision Issued Date    Fri 13 Jun 2025 Reference   25/AP/1353 Display of 1 no. new non-illuminated box fascia with vinyl lettering, 1 no. new box fascia with internally illuminated acrylic lettering, 2 no. new non-illuminated box fascia, 2 no. new internally illuminated projecting signs and 1 no. new vinyl to be applied around ATM. 29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Advertisement Consent-GRANTED  Decided Mon 07 Jul 2025 The only Lordship Lane item I could find as granted in w/b 13 October was to do with replacement of Dulwich Library's heating system by an air heat pump. 
    • Oh give it a break.  We have an MP who makes racist comments, yet our media (and what seems like this Forum) that generally hate Labour (and loved Johnson) are just out looking for the dirt. It's a move on, nothing to see here.  Particularly if she used a letting agency.
    • Hi all, I highly recommend Rob Mills Gas Safe boiler engineer, helpful and knowledgeable. contact number 07952584171    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...