Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The Appeal Court has refused to recognise an "over the telephone" Muslim marriage, between an autistic British man (who functions at the level of a three year old and is said to be highly suggestible) and a woman in Bangladesh, he has never met. The wedding, under Sharia law, would have enabled his new wife to get a visa and join him in this country. Now, I've heard everything.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But the important question is "would you?"


She looks a whole lot more attractive with ?24.3 million in the bank but I wouldn't touch her with a bargepole not that I've got a bargepole. She is vile.

Jah Lush wrote:She's a deranged old slapper


Not doing too bad for a one legged, strident, deranged old slapper though.

Isn't it time divorce settlements were reconsidered?

Who believes this amount of money can be justified other than Heather?

Wouldn't it be more appropriate for each individual to take out what they put in?

That voice of Thomas the Tank Engine Would seduce even you I'm sure DC, but the man who gave us the frog chorus...even for $25 million, really?


* he he, I toned down my post thrice in the composition, only to see we can always count on *Bob* to lower the tone!! ;) *

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Come on now, Gents.

> Be honest - hand on heart - ?25m for doing Ringo

> up the rotbox. Just once. No kissing. Cash in

> hand.

>

> Anyone who says they wouldn't is a barefaced liar.


Gunnery Sergeant Hartman: I'll bet you're the kind of guy that would fuck a person in the ass and not even have the goddam common courtesy to give him a reach-around. I'll be watching you

Regarding Paul and Heather:



I'm with LizzygotDizzy here - she has been crucified by the media - I'm not a fan of hers, but the level of vilification takes my breath away. It is clear that she is suffering from some mental disorder....so


Has anyone considered that maybe being married to Paul sent Heather off her rocker?

I agree with Keef, rumours of his bullying and unpleasantness to his staff have been making the rounds for years.


Heather Mills does seem to be self-serving and money-grubbing, but no-one deserves the kicking she's had - nor the truly horrible focus on her disability.


And *Bob* - I honestly, honestly wouldn't. (Not that I'm equipped to, but you know what I mean) As Churchill said (to some society bird, sorry forget who:-


- Would you sleep with me for a million pounds?

Society bird - Well, I suppose I would, Mr. Churchill

Winston - Well, then would you sleep with me for one pound?

Society bird *outraged* - Mr Churchill, what sort of woman do you think I am?

Winston - Madam, we have already established what sort of woman you are, now we're haggling.

Just re-read my post, and there's no connection with what Keef said at all. Sorry. What I meant was - yes, she might be rather unwell, and doesn't deserve the treatment she's had. Oh, and Mr. M doesn't seem that nice either.


(goes off muttering something about previewing messages before posting next time..)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
    • You don’t think there are right-wing politicians fanning this with rhetoric? Really? 
    • No party is willing to tackle the "elephant in the room" which is the national debt. It is costing the country circa £100 Billion ANNUALLY to service that debt. That is more than the defence and education budgets. That debt burden has to be reduced which in reality means cost cuts. That means cutting back state pensions, index-linked pensions for civil servants and others such as police, NHS etc. It means cutting back on universal credit and cutting the number of people who are claiming benefits.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...