Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If a front garden is bordered by a hedge that extends out over the pavement, how far out is considered acceptable? It's not unusual for about a third of the pavement space to be lost to overhanging hedges, causing a bottleneck should there be a lamp post or tree at the kerbside opposite, and bloody awkward on narrow pavements on residential streets.


I feel the tingle of a coming 'hedge rage'...




BTW, you know you read the title of this thread and clicked on it for all the wrong reasons...

if it causes an obstruction it needs to be trimmed back, when it rains the branches gain wait and hang outwards so if you brush past them you get a soaking, also this makes less room for (say) parents with prams, basic obligation is to keep it in order.

having said that, must trim mine it's been a few years.

KidKruger Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> if it causes an obstruction it needs to be trimmed

> back, when it rains the branches gain wait and

> hang outwards so if you brush past them you get a

> soaking, also this makes less room for (say)

> parents with prams, basic obligation is to keep it

> in order.

> having said that, must trim mine it's been a few

> years.


We are talking about your pubes here right????

SteveT Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The growth should not extend beyond the boundary

> of the property, and if Southwark get involved

> they charge you for doing the maintenance the

> owner should have carried out, I believe.


This is right. It can hinder and injure blind and visually impaired people as well as others. A lot of property owners don't give a damn. Report any problem hedges to Southwark.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The BBC is one of the finest, if not the finest, broadcasters in the world.  They have been admired by many across the world for their journalism.  There have been numerous arrests since their recent expose on convenience shops that cover ups for criminals - money laundering, contraband,  illegal workers and the like. By no means perfect and some of what they have done in the modern world is questionable - the website often comes across as tabloid or sensationalist, as do some of their documentaries, and at times it is full of low grade game shows, fly on the wall etc which bring the punters and money, including overseas, in but is not quality TV.  In their desperation for 'balance' they've given too much air time and credibility to some more extreme views, which contributed to Brexit and some of the rise in right wing parties.  I wish they'd say 'the convicted criminal' every time they talk about Yaxley Lenon. The programme was clumsy, why it didn't go through proper clearance including the lawyers, I don't know.  But it created zero stir at the time. Zero.  And had no impact on the election, so Trump has no case.  I hope they don't cave in like many of the US corporations and media.  Oh and well done to South Park using the small p*nis defence in ridiculing him. What I expect is as the Beeb is pretty centrist in it;s reporting in riles some of those who thrive on the toxic populism we have seen since Trump mark 1 and Brexit.  How sad.
    • I understand from Pao that they are taking a short break but will be re-opening on Tuesday 25th November and also that there will be a sign in the window tomorrow, by way of confirmation. Meanwhile, greatly  missed! 
    • He is bummed he missed last forum drinks 
    • They get one thing running and another goes down!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...