Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It is difficult to read this with the Solomon's Passage thread (or many others) and not feel that this is a tragic waste of effort - there are important causes to espouse in ED, this really isn't one of them, but seems purely diversionary. [And yes, I do know that, as a Councilor, the OP doesn't have Solomon's passage on his specific plate]. The forum isn't representative, so calling for comments here is (very possibly) pointless. I am very pleased that an official has chosen to make a judgement about causes (breaches of regulations) that are worth pursuing and ones that aren't. Isn't that type of judgement one we keep asking officials to make (proportionality and cost: benefit judgments?)

hpsaucey Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Laddy Muck Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue Wrote:

> > -------------------

> > > I loved the bee mural!

> >

> > Me too! There used to be a spider too...is it

> > still there?

>

> Has the bee one gone??? If so what a shame.



Yes it's gone, I think there were some damp problems or something and the wall had to be repaired, it was mentioned on here at the time.


There's now another mural there, which sadly I find really boring compared to the bee.


Don't remember the spider.

It doesn't take that much effort to canvas opinion, monitor it and then ask the offender to take the offensive item down, so the "what aboutery" reasoning doesn't hold water. It's not particularly ugly, it's in good nick and it's promoting a local business but if it's allowed to stay then others may well do it and that would look bad.


Still awaiting answers as to whether the steam fairs/circuses are allowed by Southwark to post bills/placards if they take them down afterwards......

Nigello Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Still awaiting answers as to whether the steam

> fairs/circuses are allowed by Southwark to post

> bills/placards if they take them down

> afterwards......


Apparently they have deemed consent under section 3f of the following document


http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/2007/783/schedule/3/made


As long as they notify Southwark at the correct time, don't display them more then 14 days prior and remove them with 7 days of last performance then they don't need specific advertising consent ...


The things you Learn when you run away to a travelling circus!!!

sizemore Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If it's illegal then what's to stop anyone else removing it?

>

> Or better still painting over it with something more interesting like a penguin eating a hot dog.


Just because it is illegally sited, that wouldn't stop the owners having you charged with criminal damage.

Penguin, you say this isn't one of the important causes to espouse in ED in the context of Solomon's Passage but I think the two are intrinsically linked.


If Southwark Council employees pick and choose which bits of the law relating to planning and buildings that they personally wish to enforce, and have the chutzpah to tell an elected councillor so, then it's no surprise that it starts with an illegal billboard and ends with an unsafe building.


All of these laws are in place for a reason and Sotuhwark's job is to implement and administer them, not choose which bits they like and which they don't.

I sort of half agree with you Abe, but sometimes a little discretion has to be exercised - for example there was an article in The Guardian recently reporting how Brighton council had been ordering people to tear down the cycle storage boxes in their front gardens as by law any development beyond the street facing building boundary needs planning permission. If Southwark suddenly decided to follow the same course I think most would agree it was a pointless waste of time and money...there are some laws more honoured in the breach than the observance, as the Danish chap said.


How about Glazer Delmar can keep their ad in exchange for some pro bono advice for the Solomon's Passage residents? Just a thought...

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I sort of half agree with you Abe, but sometimes a

> little discretion has to be exercised - for

> example there was an article in The Guardian

> recently reporting how Brighton council had been

> ordering people to tear down the cycle storage

> boxes in their front gardens as by law any

> development beyond the street facing building

> boundary needs planning permission. If Southwark

> suddenly decided to follow the same course I think

> most would agree it was a pointless waste of time

> and money...there are some laws more honoured in

> the breach than the observance, as the Danish chap

> said.

>

> How about Glazer Delmar can keep their ad in

> exchange for some pro bono advice for the

> Solomon's Passage residents? Just a thought...



a fine sentiment displayed, however : see my earlier post : Glazer Delmar take instructions from landlords and not tenants.

This was my seemingly tenuous link to the sign outside Londis, i.e. : when I asked at reception did the company deal with landlord/tenant disputes I was told, we work for the landlord. I am also a Wandle tenant, but not from Solomon's Passage, at my wit's end with them. And then spurned by my local solicitors; and despite Steveo's assumption that they will work for fiscal reward = ergo, the sign has to come down - see my logic and reasoning?

rendelharris Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I sort of half agree with you Abe, but sometimes a

> little discretion has to be exercised - for

> example there was an article in The Guardian

> recently reporting how Brighton council had been

> ordering people to tear down the cycle storage

> boxes in their front gardens as by law any

> development beyond the street facing building

> boundary needs planning permission. If Southwark

> suddenly decided to follow the same course I think

> most would agree it was a pointless waste of time

> and money...there are some laws more honoured in

> the breach than the observance, as the Danish chap

> said.

>

> How about Glazer Delmar can keep their ad in

> exchange for some pro bono advice for the

> Solomon's Passage residents? Just a thought...


Also, the Brighton example which you offered referred to many bins and covers : this solicitors sign is singular,

and more easily dealt with ha ha ' maniacal laughter '

> This was my seemingly tenuous link to the sign

> outside Londis, i.e. : when I asked at reception

> did the company deal with landlord/tenant disputes

> I was told, we work for the landlord. I am also a

> Wandle tenant, but not from Solomon's Passage, at

> my wit's end with them. And then spurned by my

> local solicitors; and despite Steveo's assumption

> that they will work for fiscal reward = ergo, the

> sign has to come down - see my logic and

> reasoning?


Yep and stuff 'em then, I hold no brief for the firm nor their advertisement, and on balance I'd sooner companies were not allowed to plaster the urban environment with hoardings (though perversely I do love the old painted ads on gable ends one still sees here and there). I was just making the more general point that if we don't allow local councils a little discretion and instead expect them to apply the strict letter of the law in every case life would quickly become intolerable.

Hi sizemore,

If someone did paint or add something else on such an illegal advertisement would that be or not be a criminal act?

It appears council officers won't act unless it causes visual harm.

Someone could have some fun with this...

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi sizemore,

> If someone did paint or add something else on such

> an illegal advertisement would that be or not be a

> criminal act?

> It appears council officers won't act unless it

> causes visual harm.

> Someone could have some fun with this...


What are you saying James.. Are you encouraging folk to as you put it .. 'Have some fun' ?


I disapprove of their blatant advertising even though I am a Delmar Glazier client.


DulwichFox

James,


One person's visual harm is another person's art I guess :) but yeah I'd much rather see it become a suddenly interesting 'project' that prods both the illegal sign owners and the reluctant powers-that-be into action. It's just a dull sign now and it could be so much more. Penguins, hotdogs etc.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi sizemore,

> If someone did paint or add something else on such

> an illegal advertisement would that be or not be a

> criminal act?

> It appears council officers won't act unless it

> causes visual harm.

> Someone could have some fun with this...


James, are you confident that is not an incitement to cause criminal damage? Vandalism of the sign (property belonging to another) would surely amount to criminal damage just as damaging an illegal vehicle parked on the public highway without tax or MOT would be. It's entirely up to you James, but you might want to reflect on that posting (particularly the last sentence!). After all, you are an elected representative and presumably in favour of upholding the law.

To put it another way, the answer may or may not lie in Section 5 of the Criminal Damage Act 1971 under the heading "lawful excuse". I'm not saying either way, but you might be able to answer your question (about whether it would be illegal) by reading that.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Gone to the better hunting grounds during this local ongoing dry spell.
    • The Dreamliner has an impeccable service history, you are more likely to get mugged on the way to the airport than having any issue with your flight, that's how safe it is!  Have a great trip.
    • Maybe. Does that kill grass? If so, possibly the same dog that has left its poo outside my house - pretty sure it's not fox poo.
    • Here you are, intexasatthemoment (you seem to have been in Texas for a very long time!) We went to three of the recommended places yesterday,  as they were all in the same road (just near Wallington)  and I needed to give the car a run to avoid another slap on the wrist from my garage (and another new battery). Here's my findings. BARNES Parking We thought we would go here first as it was the earliest to close on a Sunday (3pm). There was no apparent entrance or anywhere to park. One notice said do not park on grass verge, and another one said staff cars only! Flittons was opposite but I'd already passed the entrance, so I had to drive down the road, turn round at the next available place (covered in signs saying do not park here) and park in Flittons car park! Plants Barnes  specialise in hardy perennials, so that was basically what they had, but an excellent selection, and many more unusual plants (or at least, plants you probably wouldn't find in a garden centre), eg Corydalis,  lots of different varieties of Epimediums, Trollius, some lovely Phygelius, lots of different ferns). The plants were divided into sections according to whether they needed sun or shade or could cope with both. They had a particularly good selection of  shade loving plants. There was really useful information above  each group of plants, which meant you didn't have to look at individual labels. All the plants looked in good health and  very well cared for. They don't produce a printed catalogue, but they  said their plant list was online (I haven't looked yet). I assume most of  the plants they have at any one time are when it's their flowering season (if they flower). I wasn't intending to buy anything, though was very tempted, but I'd definitely go here again once I've sorted out my overgrown garden. Other Stuff Don't think they sell pots, compost, etc. No cafe/tea room and I didn't see a loo, but Flittons is just over the road. FLITTONS  Parking Easy to park Plants Sorry, but mostly terrible. There was one section with vegetables and the rest was flowering plants. There was a general feeling of delapidation. Some of what was on display was actually dead (surely it would only take a minute to remove dead plants) and a lot of the rest was very poorly maintained, eg gone to seed, weedy, apparently unwatered, or with a lot of dead leaves. There was a notice asking for volunteers to work there, so I can only assume they can't afford to pay staff. Other stuff There was a notice to a play barn (?) saying invited people only, so I think they must host kids' parties or something. They redeemed themselves with a cosy little cafe with savoury stuff, nice cakes, iced chai and oat milk, and a loo. Also a selection of books and CDs on sale for charity. If you want an Andrews Sisters CD, you can find one here. There is a small shop with gift shop type stuff and a display of the history of Flittons, which apparently is family owned since the sixties (I think it was). I suspect that the arrival of Dobbies down the road must have greatly affected Flittons' fortunes, which is sad. DOBBIES  Parking Easy in theory once you had navigated a rather narrow entrance, but it was very busy so it took a while to find a space. Plants  Lots of plants, well maintained but I imagine their turnover is high. Lots of nice bedding plants for hanging baskets, window boxes etc  to cater for all tastes (ie some of it wasn't mine, but fine if you like those horrid little begonias (my opinion only) but they did have some nice (in my opinion) stuff as well. I was tempted but decided to buy from North Cross Road market. Fair selection of climbers, various different Clematis etc. I'd be happy to buy plants from here. The prices seemed reasonable and they were in good condition. Other stuff  It's a big garden centre with all that entails these days, so a large area selling garden furniture and storage, tools, animal collars, pots, all the usual stuff you would expect. Very helpful staff. There's a cafe which we didn't check out, charging points for electric cars, a Waitrose (no idea how big, we didn't look). Only on our way out did we see that there was a drive through "express section" for compost etc, which was annoying as I wanted compost and hadn't seen any anywhere,  but I was getting tired by that time. Just Down the Road A ten minute drive away is Wilderness Island, a nature reserve in Carshalton, which is well worth a visit. We heard eleven different kinds of bird (according to Merlin) and saw a Kingfisher flying down the tiny river!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...