Jump to content

Recommended Posts



Just to clarify.... Dirtybox, in case there was any confusion about the point I was trying to make...


The final count goes something like this....

Conservative 10,706,647

Labour 8,604,358

Liberal Dem 6,827,938


Labour and Lib dem are both left of centre so 15,408,716 people do not want a right of centre party in power (nearly 5,000,000 more than do want a right wing government... rock on the Lib Lab coalition

charliecharlie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Labour and Lib dem are both left of centre so

> 15,408,716 people do not want a right of centre

> party in power (nearly 5,000,000 more than do want

> a right wing government... rock on the Lib Lab

> coalition


Unfortunatley CC it seems that Clegg has forgotten that people who voted for him and his party mostly wanted a left of centre government and he is probably going to give them a right of centre government - exactly what they did not vote for.

charliecharlie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> results so far...

>

> Conservative 10,091,687 36.1 +3.9

> Labour 8,144,932 29.2 -6.3

> Liberal Dem 6,400,096 22.9 +1.0

>

> 14.5 million people (who voted for the 3 main

> parties... so the full figure is considerably

> more) DO NOT WANT a Tory government!

>

> I am hoping for a Labour/Lib Dem coalition...

>

> what are your views...

>

> ps bit muzzy headed as went to bed at 3 and got up

> at 6 so will definitely need that gin and tonic

> tonight at the Gowlett



Interestingly, by the same token, 16.5 million people DO NOT WANT a Labour government, yet you're suggesting that would be the most democratic result? Despite the efforts of old school Labour activists, this election was not about left and right, and neither is politics generally about that any more either. Whatever your thoughts on first past the post (and Labour supporters might like to recall that it actually works more in their favour than the Tories'), more than 70% of those who voted chose a party other than Labour.


I think that what this election has shown above all is that the country as a whole is not divided in clean left and right lines. Any party that was prepared to be honest, practical, pragmatic and sensible (and to listen to the electorate) would have done very well. Unfortunately none of them ticked all the boxes. Under most forms of PR, we would end up with this type of mess every election. We could also find that Lib Dems, with the support of just 20% of the country, get to govern (in coalition) on an almost permanent basis. How democratic is that?


Personally, for the sake of the country's finances and for the sake of the political system, I would like to see a Conservative government with Lib Dem support (how much more democratic and in the national interest would it be if Labour took that supporting role?). If they can make it work, the Lib Dems could gain enormously from this.

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Unfortunatley CC it seems that Clegg has forgotten

> that people who voted for him and his party mostly

> wanted a left of centre government and he is

> probably going to give them a right of centre

> government - exactly what they did not vote for.


Although a Lab/Lib coalition wouldn?t really have been left of centre anyway. Many people will disagree with me but I think they are correct in going with the party with the most votes (such as democracy dictates) and if they get what they want out of the deal it will ultimately be worth it for everyone. We?ve got to remember that for this one very rare window we have a political party that doesn?t have ulterior motives in a position to actually influence policy. Whether they will be allowed to is doubtful but who knows.


But you know, fuck it. Expediency is the issue not representation. What we need is a conservative dictatorship backed up by the military. That will get things done. Who are ?people? to have a say anyway? (Which seems to be the opinion of some of my tory colleagues this morning)

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> charliecharlie Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> >

> > Labour and Lib dem are both left of centre so

> > 15,408,716 people do not want a right of centre

> > party in power (nearly 5,000,000 more than do

> want

> > a right wing government... rock on the Lib Lab

> > coalition

>

> Unfortunatley CC it seems that Clegg has forgotten

> that people who voted for him and his party mostly

> wanted a left of centre government and he is

> probably going to give them a right of centre

> government - exactly what they did not vote for.



There you go - as predicted - Clegg and Cable are just a bunch of blackmailing bedhoppers.....


I have to admit I had grown a little tired of Labour so don't mind Cameron getting in. Need a harder line on immigration and prefer a little less tax and spend. But I think the Conservatives will be deeply aware of their Thatherite legacy and will do a more compassionate job. Brown was brilliant at saving the financial sector and Blair is my favourtite politician, yet the markets will react well to tories getting in. Its about cycles I guess.


Hope Clegg and Cable don't have too much of a role. They worry me.

Look*, the public finances are in a horrendous state as they tend to be after Labour governements. We need some massive cuts in Public Spending, Labour just doesn't have that capability in its DNA and to get a majority would have needed the SNP and Plaid Cymru in with the LDs. This would have meant no cuts in Scotland/Wales, the english would have been up in arms (and justifyibly so.) Plus given that Labour has 120 odd MPs who are in Unite or Unison then Public Sector cuts would have been shied away from. Soooooo tory haters, in they'll go, make the cuts, maybe put the country's finances in order again but not get any thanks for it and be booted out in a Labour landslide....and the whole merry circus begins again. Cheer up Labourites its the best result for the the Labour party by miles



* Please note adoption of all politicians favourite Obama style start of an point 'Look'

wow, almost found myself agreeing with mick mac's post until the bit about Tony Blair!!


Osborne chancellor! We will be living in mud huts soon.


William Hague as Foreign Secretary? How wrong could I be....


Have the lib dems sold their souls? Should we prepare for anarchy? ::o


News just in - DC still a smug b******.

That orange birdy is a dead duck. Liberals will vanish, the public handed starstruck clegg a poisened chalice to see what depth their was to his ' new politics' . He grabbed it with both hands and then licked out the cup for good measure. Oh how the crowd laughed.


Put away from you a deceitful mouth, and put perverse lips far from you.

Let your eyes look straight ahead, and your eyelids look right before you...

Ponder the path of your feet, and let all your ways be established.

Do not turn to the right or the left; remove your foot from evil." Proverbs 4:24-27

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> katie1997 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > wow, almost found myself agreeing with mick

> mac's

> > post until the bit about Tony Blair!!

> >

>

>

> "Blair is my favourite politician" - you can't

> disagree with that.....


You are clearly unwell Mick Mac. I hope you recover soon. All the best.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I mean I hold no portfolio to defend Gala,  but I suspect that is their office.  I am a company director,  my home address is also not registered with Companies House. Also guys this is Peckham not Royston Vasey.  Shoreditch is a mere 20 mins away by train, it's not an offshore bolt hole in Luxembourg.
    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...