Jump to content

Recommended Posts

But they didn't expect a win. Boris used the referendum to forward his own ambition. He expected a narrow loss that he could then use. That's why he was so sheepish the day after. They all were. And then Cameron pulled a masterstroke, and stepped down. This is about an Eton rivalry, and both Cameron and Boris are prepared to junk UK plc to out-do each other. Completely disgraceful.
I agree with your analysis of Boris's motives, but this is more than an Eton rivalry. I believe most of the rest of the Leave campaign genuinely believed in their message. The idea that they engaged in this with zero thought as to what would come next is, sadly, consistent with the lack of rational thought that underlined their arguments on many topics.

Great post Azira - that video says it all.


The referendum is now revealed as profoundly undemocratic. The will of the people is not expressible by a single vote unless a massive majority and based on planning not posturing so that the revealed 'will' is stable. Clearly that is NOT the case here. That will has already moved on as the lies are exposed. If one wants democracy of this kind, new information demands new referendums as it comes to light (as is also the case when any plan has actually been made). A single referendum is aporetic.


The whole point of parliamentary democracy (as opposed to plebiscites) is that there is an ONGOING interrogation of policies.


But of course there could not be a plan, could there? The antimony in the leave camp would have been exposed (as it now is). The Norway solution (the only possible one that would be non-catastrophic for the UK economy) is anathema to the Ruritanians because it demands free movement of labour as the price of a common market.

Well FORTUNATELY, the politicians themselves will not be negotiating the trade deal/ exit deals.


Because Cameron resigned - and he was our PM, we need a new PM to initiate the changes. Hence the confusion.


The blame game is clearly afoot. Corbyn - well - did he really do that badly? Labour constituencies voted Remain quite vehmently. CAmeron should have got his house in order and failed.


Boris - we'll I'd have expected something to be lined up - perhaps it's just not been announced yet. Has he actually said the opposite?


Can we officially call this after the dessert, Eton Mess?

I don't draw conclusions about people's motives because that I believe is impossible. (Sometimes it's hard even fully to know your own...)

But I agree - no leave plan.

But they have always said it. Said to the PM on a live tv debate when they were asked. Spokesperson said "His problem".

Which it is. Again, it is not Cameron's personal problem. Although you can blame Cameron personally - if you like - for calling a bloody 50% popular vote on the infrastructure of a big part of the global political and economic world, no one can escape the reality that planning and executing BREXIT for the UK is a task which only the government is constitutionally able to do.

And leave is not a government. Or even an opposition party. It's simply a rag-tag of co-belligerents, with no common ideology and absolutely no policy. Leave is just a slogan.


Even if BJ (or Gove) had had a plan, he'd be powerless to implement it because he is not PM. He is not the government.


It's why this is a constitutional crisis now.

The referendum is - in itself - less that that. It's an indication of what the electorate want.


The fact that it has brought out so many lies, dirty-=dealings - uncomfortable truths - here and across EU - means that this will never go back to Business As Usual.


Pandora's box of opinion and mettle has been well and truly opened.


Now, it's time to do something about it.

If Leave had a plan they should've spoken up by now. I admit it's possible they are working out details, or maybe just waiting until Monday morning to announce, but I think that's a mistake. People want stability and clarity (from politicians, ha! Yes I get the irony), as I hope we hear from them very soon.


I get that we need to wait for a new PM and associated govt to be in place before things move forward, but some indicator of intentions is owed to the general public, even if they need time to resolve details.

Uncertainty helps no one.

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The referendum is - in itself - less that that.

> It's an indication of what the electorate want.

>

> The fact that it has brought out so many lies,

> dirty-=dealings - uncomfortable truths - here and

> across EU - means that this will never go back to

> Business As Usual.

>

> Pandora's box of opinion and mettle has been well

> and truly opened.

>

> Now, it's time to do something about it.



Agreed. But what? If we know anything right now it's that we have no idea what will happen next. Makes it hard to work out what we - as an electorate - should be asking for. Obviously as an electorate we've spoken regarding the EU. But will they press on with Article 50, and if so then when, and if not then what?

Not just that, but the markets need to be stabilised too. Sterling is expected to take another hit tm. And the Euro has been hit too. This doesn't just affect our economy, but is sending shock waves that are affecting the economies of others too. That's why there are calls from other EU countries to get started now. They are taking hits for our decision too. And this is all before anything in a physical sense has even happened. Having said that, a mutually acceptable agreement between us and Europe will help the markets, which is why I still think we'll end up with a Norway type deal that we can live with.


Whoever takes the seat of government to lead on this, they are screwed.

Azira Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> messageRe: There is no plan new

> Posted by Jules-and-Boo Today, 05:45PM

>

> Can we officially call this after the dessert,

> Eton Mess?

>

>

> No, because if we learn anything from this whole

> mess, it should be to be suspicious of simple

> stories.


Oooooo wise words. Azira, I don't know you. But please God, are you under 35? If so, please consider a career in public life.

Agreed Jules-and-Boy. But I really think only Buckingham Palace can do it.


It's call a GE or appoint a new PM from existing MPs.


(Could be anyone in theory. Could be a member of the Hoise of Lords and has been historically, at least once that I can think of off the top of my head.)

There was never, at no point, whatsoever, ANY plan from Vote Leave camp, which makes it even more ridiculous that anyone voted for leave. Stupid stupid stupid. Roast beef was great, Mr. HB ate a whole packet of veg sausages, ms. Bedford enjoyed the Yorkshires. We are now a bottle of gin and a bottle of wine or two down and despairing of the stupidity of ANYONE believing Boris and Farage - one sacked for being a liar and one an out and out racist.

What this shows whether you voted in or out there is no politician or political party that has any kudos to pick the baton up and run with it.


It is a internet world and real live experience now does not exist to make any worthwhile contribution.


Perhaps people should look at the Somme, misguided but true conviction.


How many of these people would welcome a rerun.


Snowflake generation, how very true.


Referendum. advisory to Government Yes. Let's backtrack. Make your mind up to what this means to this Country.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A A day-school for girls and a boarding school for boys (even with, by the late '90s, a tiny cadre of girls) are very different places.  Though there are some similarities. I think all schools, for instance, have similar "rules", much as they all nail up notices about "potential" and "achievement" and keeping to the left on the stairs. The private schools go a little further, banging on about "serving the public", as they have since they were set up (either to supply the colonies with District Commissioners, Brigadiers and Missionaries, or the provinces with railway engineers), so they've got the language and rituals down nicely. Which, i suppose, is what visitors and day-pupils expect, and are expected, to see. A boarding school, outside the cloistered hours of lesson-times, once the day-pupils and teaching staff have been sent packing, the gates and chapel safely locked and the brochures put away, becomes a much less ambassadorial place. That's largely because they're filled with several hundred bored, tired, self-supervised adolescents condemned to spend the night together in the flickering, dripping bowels of its ancient buildings, most of which were designed only to impress from the outside, the comfort of their occupants being secondary to the glory of whatever piratical benefactor had, in a last-ditch attempt to sway the judgement of their god, chucked a little of their ill-gotten at the alleged improvement of the better class of urchin. Those adolescents may, to the curious eyes of the outer world, seem privileged but, in that moment, they cannot access any outer world (at least pre-1996 or thereabouts). Their whole existence, for months at a time, takes place in uniformity behind those gates where money, should they have any to hand, cannot purchase better food or warmer clothing. In that peculiar world, there is no difference between the seventh son of a murderous sheikh, the darling child of a ball-bearing magnate, the umpteenth Viscount Smethwick, or the offspring of some hapless Foreign Office drone who's got themselves posted to Minsk. They are egalitarian, in that sense, but that's as far as it goes. In any place where rank and priviilege mean nothing, other measures will evolve, which is why even the best-intentioned of committees will, from time to time, spawn its cliques and launch heated disputes over archaic matters that, in any other context, would have long been forgotten. The same is true of the boarding school which, over the dismal centuries, has developed a certain culture all its own, with a language indended to pass all understanding and attitiudes and practices to match. This is unsurprising as every new intake will, being young and disoriented, eagerly mimic their seniors, and so also learn those words and attitudes and practices which, miserably or otherwise, will more accurately reflect the weight of history than the Guardian's style-guide and, to contemporary eyes and ears, seem outlandish, beastly and deplorably wicked. Which, of course, it all is. But however much we might regret it, and urge headteachers to get up on Sundays and preach about how we should all be tolerant, not kill anyone unnecessarily, and take pity on the oiks, it won't make the blindest bit of difference. William Golding may, according to psychologists, have overstated his case but I doubt that many 20th Century boarders would agree with them. Instead, they might look to Shakespeare, who cheerfully exploits differences of sex and race and belief and ability to arm his bullies, murderers, fraudsters and tyrants and remains celebrated to this day,  Admittedly, this is mostly opinion, borne only of my own regrettable experience and, because I had that experience and heard those words (though, being naive and small-townish, i didn't understand them till much later) and saw and suffered a heap of brutishness*, that might make my opinion both unfair and biased.  If so, then I can only say it's the least that those institutions deserve. Sure, the schools themselves don't willingly foster that culture, which is wholly contrary to everything in the brochures, but there's not much they can do about it without posting staff permanently in corridors and dormitories and washrooms, which would, I'd suggest, create a whole other set of problems, not least financial. So, like any other business, they take care of the money and keep aloof from the rest. That, to my mind, is the problem. They've turned something into a business that really shouldn't be a business. Education is one thing, raising a child is another, and limited-liability corporations, however charitable, tend not to make the best parents. And so, in retrospect, I'm inclined not to blame the students either (though, for years after, I eagerly read the my Old School magazine, my heart doing a little dance at every black-edged announcement of a yachting tragedy, avalanche or coup). They get chucked into this swamp where they have to learn to fend for themselves and so many, naturally, will behave like predators in an attempt to fit in. Not all, certainly. Some will keep their heads down and hope not to be noticed while others, if they have a particular talent, might find that it protects them. But that leaves more than enough to keep the toxic culture alive, and it is no surprise at all that when they emerge they appear damaged to the outside world. For that's exactly what they are. They might, and sometimes do, improve once returned to the normal stream of life if given time and support, and that's good. But the damage lasts, all the same, and isn't a reason to vote for them. * Not, if it helps to disappoint any lawyers, at Dulwich, though there's nothing in the allegations that I didn't instantly recognise, 
    • Another recommendation for Lorraine  - if you need help over the holidays, she still has a small amount of availability. Couldn’t recommend her more highly, she’s brilliant with our cat. Message her on 07718 752208 for more details re pricing etc.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...