Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Boris has endorsed Leadsom. That's her out, then.


Not a surprise, I think they're made for each other. Both a couple of air-heads with a questionnable relationship with the truth.

The Sunday Times seems to have manoeuvred Leadsom into a comment about herself being a mother and Theresa May not, and then turned it into a headline. Guess that implies who Murdoch supports.


Just read the leadership ballot doesn't close till 9 Sept, so another two months of this to come...

Leadsom said:


"So really carefully because I am sure, I don't really know Theresa very well but I am sure she will be really really sad she doesn't have children so I don't want this to be 'Andrea has children, Theresa hasn't' because I think that would be really horrible.


"But genuinely I feel being a mum means you have a very real stake in the future of our country, a tangible stake.


"She possibly has nieces, nephews, lots of people, but I have children, who are going to have children, who will directly be a part of what happens next.


"So it really keeps you focused on 'what are you really saying?'. Because what it means is you don't want a downturn but 'never mind, let's look ahead to the ten years', hence it will all be fine. My children will be starting their lives in that next ten years so I have a real stake in the next year, the next two."


She clearly implies that having children makes her a better choice for PM than May: "She possibly has nieces, nephews, lots of people, but I have children." She wasn't tricked into saying it, she was asked what she thought were the major differences between herself and May and she said "Economic competence and family."


The "I don't want this to be 'Andrea has children'" comment is so transparently disingenuous, it's like saying "I don't want this campaign to be about the fact that my opponent is a former drug addict and has been in prison and I don't want it mentioned again, and I'll make sure it's never mentioned again by saying I don't want it mentioned at every opportunity." If she didn't want the campaign to feature the fact that she has children and May hasn't, why mention it at all?


She'd already proved what a foul person she is with her gay marriage and fox-hunting stance, she's been proved to be a liar with her CV, and this puts the icing on the cake of her unpleasantness.

WorkingMummy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> she is awful.

> I bet the Tory party membership love her


Yes, it's very scarey as they're the ones who will vote for the final selection. Stretching credulity to breaking point that she was not being disingenuous regarding her comments about having children, can someone as tactless as this be trusted to negotiate on our behalf with Europe? Odious woman.

For God sake .. Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn calls for unity at Durham Miners' Gala..


Going on about Thatcher destroying the Mining industry..


Well I and many others were there in the 1980's spporting the Miners..

My Grandad worked in the Mines of South Wales at the age of 13. 1900's ish looking after Pit Ponies.

so I have a great deal of empathy with Miners.


That speech would of seemed apt in the 80's but has less impact today..


The man lives in the past.. But it's not so much what he says , but more about the way he says things.

I cannot put my finger on it..


Nothing he says is ground breaking. Its all been said before..


I do not think he would make a 'Great' Prime Minister in this age..

And I do not think he will survive as Labour Leader.


DulwichFox

Corbyn is the least democratic political leader we have seen since Thatcher..

.. prepared to split the Labour Party and ditch fellow Members in an attempt to get his own way.


He is Stubborn with a self determination not to change his attitude.


The 'Gentleman' is not for turning..


DulichFox

Andrex Leadsom is a slippery eel of a politician, just horrible, probably loved by the party to the point of adoration


And there's something of the Edwina Curry about her


Oh lord, I feel like the hermit in the cave who was made to speak after years of silence, and my first words were "Edwina Curry"


*washes tongue*


Mrs T for me please, Terresa May that is. And who'd have thought that we'd be endorsing that now


The country has truly farted, and followed through this time




http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/jul/09/andrea-leadsom-tea-party

Everywhere you look it's bad. I'm beginning to think the Lib Dems are now the attractive option, so i know I'm definitely going mad!


Leadsom and May will take government further to the right and that doesn't bear thinking about.


Corbyn is a stubborn old fool who is prepared to rip the Labour party apart rather than do the right thing. Many long time Labour supporters like myself will never forgive him if Labour completely implodes.


Which I think leaves a void for the rise of a new centrist party, or the resurgence of the Lib Dems.

If Corbyn goe it leaves a space for labour and

Tory to kiss and make up, becoming one party. A

Healthy opposition could arise in there party.

I feel corbyn would be better away from the labour

party, it is no longer an opposing party, not for a long long time.the only thing I have seen that has brought any balance to labour,has been the varying views within labour,more true to the people they represent, of which Corbyn has always been one. I

have never voted labour as to me its full of Tories. One small step for mankind, step over and join yer mates, think of all the back bench banter.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Anyway, great to see Leadsom fall on her sword,

> silly cow.


Can't get this from Billy Bragg out of my head now:


Goodbye and good luck to all the promises you've broken

Goodbye and good luck to all the rubbish that you've spoken

Your life has lost its dignity, its beauty and its passion

You're an accident waiting to happen.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...