Jump to content

Recommended Posts

We see buses racing down Lordship,lane most days and i have to say its alarming,i mean they are only rushing into traffic and a pile up of buses along the lane.They need to slow down,because someone will get hurt.I heard of a campaign to put traffic lights by somerfield or a 30mph in that part,but nothing has been said since.

my two-penneth:


a smiling bus driver can make a big difference to your day - i've seen one this year.


this morning i sat near a man talking to himself about killing children, this evening i saw a fight between a drunk and a woman


the most physically dangerous thing i do in my life is walking down the stairs of a double decker bus in transit.

About 15 years ago, an amber light meant slow down. Now it means speed up to get through before it turns red. There's been a real shift in our attitudes to road safety, probably because there is more traffic and therefore more congestion. It'll be very hard indeed to regain those values. Bus drivers are just like a lot of other drivers, but they should really know better as the vehicles they are driving hold fare-paying passengers. Buses are big and heavy and can do lots of damage. If you are displeased with a driver, why not tell them, politely. Nero

Drink taken. Better. Back on topic..


Point is, the passenger on the 40 this morning did complain politely. And it ended in tears. Or at least broken windows.


Actually, that?s not the point. Nero is right. It is about values. And I do think we need to tackle the mindless macho driving that is making getting around, by any means, downright unpleasant and dangerous.

Bring back the Routemaster is what I say


None of these problems on the old buses when you had a conductor and seperate driver (all the Drivers had to do was worry about the traffic and other drivers without the hassle of the passegers as well)


Maybe someone should redesign a modern version of the routemaster with DDI issues solved (oh hang on they tried that and called it a Bendy Bus)


:))

No. People had a habit of launching themselves on and off the Rout master. Tfl will quote endless stats about how dangerous they were if you ever engage them on it. The choice of bus is irrelevant. One person driving and one person looking after passengers is a lot safer than one person struggling to do both.

Of course, there is a cost...

True. But if you accept a materialist interpretation of the world, power, be it patriarchal, imperialist or whatever, stems itself from a relationship to the means of production. OK. Maybe not that simple. But its late and I?ve got a number 40 bus to catch in the morning. Or maybe I?ll cycle.


Night all.

I think that materialist interpretation of the world was a reaction to the capitalist materialist interpretation of the world and doesn't actually describe the true nature of oppression which is much wider than as mere objects in the machinery that is the means of production.


I need to catch a life in the morning!


Goodnight

ChavWivaLawDegree Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think that materialist interpretation of the

> world was a reaction to the capitalist materialist

> interpretation of the world and doesn't actually

> describe the true nature of oppression which is

> much wider than as mere objects in the machinery

> that is the means of production.

>

> I need to catch a life in the morning!

>

> Goodnight


I didn't understand what this sentence was about at all, it seems just a grouping of words to me with as much meaningful content as "random green ideas sleeping furiously" Can you draw me a picture?

Doodles Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> No. People had a habit of launching themselves on

> and off the Rout master.


It's called looking after yourself and not blaming others for your own stupidity.


> Of course, there is a cost...

The money has already been wasted....


About 4 years before the Routemasters were withdrawn a large number of them were fitted with more up to date engines (Cummins -IIRC) the idea being to give them a continued life in service until about 2015 when it would have to be withdrawn to meet Disability act cut off date for Public vehicles (2017) (Again - IIRC) At this time, and when electioneering Red Ken said "Only some ghastly dehumanised moron would want to get rid of the Routemaster." He got to power and killed them all. In the world of busses there are suspicions that there may have been some backhanded shennanegins about getting the Bendy Buses into the capital.


On the disability side of things. Yes, they were not accessible, hence they were to be withdrawn to meet a deadline decreed,....Are Bendy Busses wheelchair friendly? Ask someone trying to get on one in Oxford street at 5pm...


And also the Routemaster was less polluting than the busses that replaced it. Furthermore, in terms of more effective transport the Bendy busses do not match the carrying capacity of a Routemaster, when you consider the space they take up on the road.

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Surely the routemaster could have been modified

> with a retractable ramp for wheechairs? And then

> there would have been a conductor to operate it

> unlike the automatic thing on the bendy bus that

> never works properly.


Brendan,


Sadly the issue is that once onboard there's not much in the way of storage for a chair, like modern busses have those big standing areas, so would block other passengers exits also.


Chatting to one guy on the last day, who was in a chair, he said he didn't want them to go. Though he himself didn't use them (He said London is a pain to get around in, in a chair wayway as too crowded so he didn't bother) and appreciated that they were designed in a time when there was less consideration for such folks, he saw how convenient they were for people who could use them, and as they make up the vast majority of the population why should his small minority dictate the needs to the vast majority. Must say it was an incredibly refreshing view.


Shots from the day here

"On the disability side of things. Yes, they were not accessible, hence they were to be withdrawn to meet a deadline decreed,....Are Bendy Busses wheelchair friendly? Ask someone trying to get on one in Oxford street at 5pm..."


Compliance with DDA requirements and deadlines is only one reason why the RM was withdrawn from general service. I recall that assurances that they were to be withdrawn were given years years go at an Inquest, following someone being killed when jumping off the platform of a moving RM, in Oxford St.


"Surely the routemaster could have been modified with a retractable ramp for wheechairs? And then there would have been a conductor to operate it unlike the automatic thing on the bendy bus that never works properly."


That's highly unlikely, especially given with narrowness of the aisles in RMs, and the lack of any space for a wheelchair while on board.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Staff get taxis in and out and get paid extra (which I think is x2). Some people like to work on Bank Holidays and others don’t. Some people actively avoid Christmas for personal reasons. Long live freedom of choice! 
    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
    • It’s a big problem all over London. I’ve seen it happen in Kennington and Bloomsbury in the last year. I think there has been some progress recently with some key arrests, but you do need to be very careful when walking around with your phone out, especially, as you say, if wearing noise cancelling headphones. Sorry you experienced this 
    • Luke Johnson (prominent director and co-owner), supported Brexit and backed the Vote Leave campaign. He also described the response to Covid as ‘a campaign of fear’ and 2020 funded a media consultant for the ‘Covid-recovery group’ of anti-lockdown MPs.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...