Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm not winding anyone up.


Louisa posts a new thread.. I reply because I happen to know what is going on and have done for some time..


Jah Lush makes a comment He (me)threatens them with bad reviews.


Sue pipes up with an untruth about falling out with the owners.


Jah Lush then accuses me of taking money for restaurant local paper review. Again nonesense.


Sue makes another stupid remark..

Or very close to Jafflong, anyway, because they could see it from their place


I think she may of meant. Dul. Tan. well you would have to have FRigging good eyesight to see someone

sitting in Dul. Tan. from Jaflong.


Sue accusing ME of winding people up.


DulwichFox

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Michael P.

>

> There will still be BYOB.. but probably no Sunday

> Buffet. ???

>

> It's a big space and the back section may be for

> private functions.

>

> I think they plan to have some LIVE music and

> music is booked for the opening night.

>

> Foxy


Good news. Although "Sunday Buffet" has been included on the Restaurant signage.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm not winding anyone up.

>

> Louisa posts a new thread.. I reply because I

> happen to know what is going on and have done for

> some time..

>

> Jah Lush makes a comment He (me)threatens them

> with bad reviews.


This was a joke that obviously went completely over your head.


> Jah Lush then accuses me of taking money for

> restaurant local paper review. Again nonesense.


I never accused you of anything. You were being vague and I was merely trying to ascertain the facts of your 'story' and you then accuse me of being drunk. I let that one go because I couldn't be arsed and for your information I haven't had a drink since last Friday.


You let yourself get wound up.


You really are a silly old goose with delusions of gander... Geddit, geddit? oh, please yourself.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> So you can and your partner can remember me..

> saying 2-3 years ago. I had fallen out with a

> certain restaurant owner. ??

>

> That's pretty good. I cannot remember the

> conversations I had with several people in the EDT

> last night.

>



So if you can't remember conversations (though seem to remember when this one was), best not to accuse people in public of lying about them, eh?


I don't want to fall out with you, but you don't make it easy when you falsely accuse me on here of lying.

Sue.. let us put this to rest...


What ever off the cuff remark you remember from way back ..


your post..

If memory serves you fell out with them after they complained to you because they saw you in another restaurant?


That incident did not happen..


That's it.


Foxy.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue.. let us put this to rest...

>

> What ever off the cuff remark you remember from

> way back ..

>

> your post..

> If memory serves you fell out with them after

> they complained to you because they saw you in

> another restaurant?

>

> That incident did not happen..

>

> That's it.



OK Fox.


My partner and I are both completely wrong about the quite long conversation we had with you about this, started by you (not "an off the cuff remark") and, as always, you are "right".


I suppose it was stupid of me to expect an apology for being publicly accused of lying.


Never mind. Let's "put this to rest", as you say, and pretend none of it ever happened.

Possible Explaination..


Right. We did have a conversation at one time but I believe you are getting confused.


I had a row with the guy in the Bishop Pub because they kept running out of beer and I started to use the EDT.

He got the hump because the Bishop was empty and the EDT was packed.


I later went back to the Bishop and was told to sod off back to the EDT. Which I did.


Some time later a female landlady of the Bishop asked where I had been and I told her what had happend.


She said 'You are not banned. You are welcome any time. BUT make your mind up. You either drink here or drink up the road.'


I still used the EDT and when the Bishop had its last major upgrade, the original guy asked me to go and see the place and have a drink. So I did and things are all ok.


So it was not two restaurants .. it was two pubs.


Do you remember this conversation. It is the only explanation I can think of.




Foxy

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> OK Fox you win. You are always right and everybody

> else is always wrong.



Have you only just worked out that's how Foxy rolls?

Obfuscate, irritate and alienate, and if unable to answer an argument simply ignore the other persons view!


Simple really...

Joeleg.

There is no argument.. I was implemented in an incident that did not happen.. Whatever was said. 2-3 years back.

The incident would not of even warranted merit here. 'Foxy had a disagreement with a local Restaurant owner. ??

So what.. ?


I have had disagreements in many places over the years even at the the place mentioned BUT not at this place

for the reason given..


DulwichFox.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Are there any other executors? Is the solicitor a soke practioner or part of a firm? Are you and your fellow beneficiaries behaving well?  You will want to take proper  legal advice (which this is not) but you can have an executor removed by the court if they are refusing to communicate with you. I would just do that. Tell him you are doing it, tell him you have reported him to the Law Society (if you have) and tell him you will be challenging his fees with the legal services ombudsman. This all sounds outrageous to me and this solicitor doesn't sound fit to practice. Three years sounds far too long for a low value estate comprising mostly of a house. He should have sold that or rented it out whilst he was waiting to administer the estate.    Sounds like he has cost you all a lot of money.  
    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...