Jump to content

Recommended Posts

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good one LadyM. If we ever meet remind me to do my

> Bernard Manning apochryphal Michael Parkinson show

> joke.

>

> A Rabbi, an Imam and a Catholic priest walk into a

> pub.

>

> Barman - What is this? Some sort of joke.

>

> And on that note I will leave you.

>

> Laters.



Good morning HB...and WHAT a way to start the morning!


Gordon Bennett!


*in stitches*

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Thanks LM. Hope you're not too wet!


The rain has stopped now brum - though I did get soaked on my bike this morning whilst riding to Queen's Square.


I shall miss you tonight when attempting that bloomin "neutral spine"! x


And chin up - just two more days and you will be re-united with your beloved.

Piece of string walks into the bar and asks for a drink.


Barman: "Are you a piece of string?"

String: "Indeed I am"

Barman: "Sorry we don't serve pieces of string in this bar"


String leaves crossly, stops outside, twists himself around a few times and ruffles his hair. String walks back into the bar and ask the barman for a drink.


Barman: "Are you a piece of string?"

String. "No. I'm afraid not."

> I would stress, however, that this act of

> generosity on my part should not be taken as a

> precedent for the future - any abuse of which

> shall result in my immediately seeking an

> injunction against you with a view to obtaining

> damages for infringement of registered trade mark

> and passing off.

>

> Lady Esmerelda Fatima Billington-Jones.


Lady Esme - I have passed the legal text to my lawyers to decipher. They will respond in due course if needs be.


Hope the chauffeur is behaving himself and that you aren't using him to help you deplete all stocks of LCIC :))

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Would wholeheartedly recommend Aria. Quality work, very responsive, lovely guy as well. 
    • A positive update from Southwark Council - “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.“  
    • A solicitor is acting as the executor for our late Aunt's will.  He only communicates by letter which is greatly lengthening the process.  The vast majority of legal people deal by modern means - the Electronic Communications Act that allows for much, if not all of these means is now 25 years old.   Any views and advice out there? In fuller detail: The value of the estate is not high.  There are a number of beneficiaries including one in the US.  It has taken almost three years and there is no end in sight.  The estate (house) is now damp, mouldy and wall paper falling off the wall. The solicitor is hostile, has threatened beneficiaries the police (which would just waste the police's time), and will not engage constructively. He only communicates by letter.  These are poorly written, curt or even hostile, in a language from the middle of last century, he clearly is typing these himself probably on a type writer.  Of course with every letter he makes more money. We've taken the first steps to complain either through the ombudsman and/or the SRA.  We have taken legal advice a couple of times, which of course isn't cheap, and were told that his behaviour is shocking and we'd be in our right to have him removed through the courts. But.... we just want him to get on with executing the will, primarily selling the house. However he refuses to use any other form of communication but letter.  So writing to the beneficiary in the 'States can take a month to get a reply. And even in this country a week or more. Having worked with lawyers in the past I am aware that email, tele and video conferencing and even text and WhatApp are appropriate means for communication.  There could be an immediate response to his questions.   Help!        
    • Labour should be applauded for bringing in the Renter's Rights Act.  But so many of you are carried away with slagging them off. Married couples with busy lives sometimes forget who did what. On this occasion Mr Rachel Reeves was sorting out the rental agreement.  Ms Reeves was a bit flumoxed with all the grief/demonsing/witch hunts she is getting so forgot to check with her other half.   Not the first or last time this will happen with couples. (That's not having a go at the post above)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...