Jump to content

Forum Picnic - Sat 17th July - 3pm onwards - Peckham Rye Park (in front of the cafe)


Recommended Posts

citizenED Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Picnic on Peckham Rye, Saturday 17th July - Katie,

> it's in my diary. See you there. (It'll be me, my

> two little ones, a frisbee and a bucket of Turkey

> Twizzlers!


citizenED - thats FAB news, cool. :)-D


Thank god someone mentioned turkey twizzlers, I'll have you know I'm stocking up on cheeze-stringz and Spam just in case we run out. And I bet we do too (tu)


oh frisbee now you are talking...lets just hope Daizie's Timmy Enrique Hallal doesn't show us up ::o

[quote name='woofmarkthedog

which end of "Peckham Rye" please...?]



Y-es' date=' at the risk of sounding like an inexperienced picnic planner [i'](as if)[/i] who doesn't know her way around South London, or indeed, Peckham Rye park....I was gonna ask PeckhamRose or Charliecharlie for help here?


Or anyone on the forum who is coming along? Any helpful suggestions for where to meet on Peckham Rye park?*


Cheers.


*doesn't have to be OS grid co-ordinates or anything.

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But there is too a signposted, dedicated and

> fenced-off picnic area is there not, complete with

> rustic tables and benches?


Yes, but it's part of the dog-free area and at least one person is bringing her woofer.

...and we don't wish to indirectly discriminate against "Woof" either;-) or legalbeagle for that matter.


But, joking aside, a designated picnic area does sound like a sensible idea (though a pretty Japanese garden sounds idyllic)...oh decisions decisions...

giggirl Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is this an actual event or is the forum

> collectively off it's face?


I think its probably both giggirl - Sat afternoon 17 July - hope to see you there.

Moos Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> SimonM Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > But there is too a signposted, dedicated and

> > fenced-off picnic area is there not, complete

> with

> > rustic tables and benches?

>

> Yes, but it's part of the dog-free area and at

> least one person is bringing her woofer.


Moos and SimonM - thanks so much for your helpful suggestions for whereabouts in the park to hold this. Hopefully this means you are coming along too!


Rustic tables and benches sounds fab as does the idyllic garden....guess it depends whether pets are coming too. Sure we'll find somewhere thats perfect (tu)

Er, perhaps not LM - it's a lovley little spot for a quiet family picnic but no good for a forum rabble who might frighten the ducks! Remember there will be a frisbee, assorted dangerous foodstuffs and, I dare say, some booze.


I'd opt for a spot on the Common in front of the cafe or by the children's playground in the park.

citizenED Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ...little spot for

> a quiet family picnic but no good for a forum

> rabble who might frighten the ducks!



Speak for yourself citizenED!;-)


But yes - on reflection, you might well be right...shame.



hahaha, hands up who is gonna take responsibility for The Dog? (only joking you-know-who)


.....and whats all this about forum 'rabble'? ;-)


*cancels bulk order for Pimms and strawberry cream teas, replaces with super-strength beer and pretzels*

Well there's that nice strip between the Japanese Garden and the Bowling green which has nice views of both, is fenced off and won't frighten the water fowl. (I don't think I've seen a kingfisher there for two or possibly three years though anyway..)- or the big meadow facing the new school..or...or...loads of gorgeous spots to choose from really!


Am attending a school reunion that weekend so won't make it either :-)

SimonM Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Am attending a school reunion that weekend so

> won't make it either :-)


I heard that Scoop's coconut ice-cream is going to be handed out free at the picnic...

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...