Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If it wasn't for the fact that our goalkeeper Gomes is a bit like Dracula - he hates crosses - it would have been four-nil to Spurs. Mind you, I agree Liverpool should have had a penalty but we were by far the better team last night. I can't believe the form we're in at the moment since Harry has taken over. I just hope we can keep it going to the end of the season.

I don't think they'll be any cash on the table for Harry to bring players in but he's pretty good at wheeling and dealing in the market and our top priority has to be a goalkeeper.


Also, Harry has made the best start to a managerial reign at Tottenham for 110 years (five wins and a draw) and ironically the manager at that time, Frank Brettall moved on to manage Portsmouth.

The goalkeeping situation for England at the moment is a strange one. There is a lengthy list of possible to successors to, essentially, David Seaman's jersey. Yet none really stand out head-and-shoulders above the rest. Some of the performances from the below between the sticks this season have been excellent though....


James

Robinson

Kirkland

Carson

Green

Turnbull

Hart


But to choose one for a consistent England place seems problematic. James won't last much more than another year so seems nothing more than a stop-gap solution. Robinson was dreadful but seems to have found a new lease of life at Blackburn. Last weekend he nearly stopped Chelsea single-handed.

Gomez does actually look like Nosferatu as well. Theres no getting away from it hes shite and has cost us a lot of goals this season. Thats fine when your winning but when we're up against it hes going to start costing us games. Still, nice to see Ronnie Corbett come on in his place!

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The goalkeeping situation for England at the

> moment is a strange one. There is a lengthy list

> of possible to successors to, essentially, David

> Seaman's jersey. Yet none really stand out

> head-and-shoulders above the rest. Some of the

> performances from the below between the sticks

> this season have been excellent though....

>

I believe Almunia will soon be a serious contender as he is due to get his British passport soon.......

> James

> Robinson

> Kirkland

> Carson

> Green

> Turnbull

> Hart

>

> But to choose one for a consistent England place

> seems problematic. James won't last much more than

> another year so seems nothing more than a stop-gap

> solution. Robinson was dreadful but seems to have

> found a new lease of life at Blackburn. Last

> weekend he nearly stopped Chelsea single-handed.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If Almunia's not good enough for Spain he's

> certainly not good enough for England.


To be fair, he does have Casillas and Reina ahead of him and he has only been our first team regular for a season

Ladygooner Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> david_carnell Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > To be fair, Almunia's not looked great this

> > season.

>

> Really? and how many Arsenal matches have you

> watched this season?


Not as many as you, I'd hazard a guess - but through the magic of TV replays/highlights, press commentary and having a few Arsenal-supporting mates I thought it was a common assumption that he's not looked as steady as last season.


I'm happy to stand corrected though if you say different.

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Yeah, that Spain are rubbish aren't they, classic

> chokers, ever the bridesmaid never the

> bride......oh....wait.....


Nothing against him being Spanish old bean just that he's a Gooner and he's not as good as the English goalkeepers that are available.

Right thats enough Gooner bashing!


Bolton 1 Liverpool 2

Arsenal 2 Aston Villa 1

Blackburn 1 Sunderland 2

Fulham 4 Tottenham 4

Man Utd 2 Stoke City 2

Newcastle 2 Wigan 1

West Ham 2 Portsmouth 2

West Brom 0 Chelsea 4

Everton 1 Middlesbrough 2

Hull City 2 Man City 1

Bolton 1 Liverpool 2

Arsenal 2 Aston Villa 0 (I remember seeing this at highbury a few years back, 3-0 down to win 4-3 was it?, One Paul Merson scoring for Villa, great game)

Blackburn 1 Sunderland 1

Fulham 2 Tottenham 4

Man Utd 2 Stoke City 0

Newcastle 1 Wigan 2

West Ham 1 Portsmouth 0 (clean sheet and a win, go on Zola, break all this season's bad habits)

West Brom 0 Chelsea 2

Everton 1 Middlesbrough 0

Hull City 1 Man City 0

Bolton # Liverpool # - can see this being a tricky one, as we usually struggle in November and Bolton have hit form. :-S

Arsenal 2 Aston Villa 1

Blackburn 1 Sunderland 0

Fulham 1 Tottenham 1

Man Utd 2 Stoke City 0 - But not if Stoke park the team bus in front of the goal again.

Newcastle 2 Wigan 2

West Ham 0 Portsmouth 1

West Brom 1 Chelsea 2

Everton 2 v Middlesbrough 1

Hull City 0 v Man City 1

Bolton 1 Liverpool 1

Arsenal 1 Aston Villa 0

Blackburn 1 Sunderland 0

Fulham 0 Tottenham 2 ( given-up bashing spurs )

Man Utd 2 Stoke City 1 ( throw in man will upset Ferdi/Vidy and Van )

Newcastle 2 Wigan 1

West Ham 1 Portsmouth 0 ( please let it be )

West Brom 0 Chelsea 2


Everton 1 v Middlesbrough 1

Hull City 1 v Man City 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Unless we don't fly I don't think we can be too critical of the authorities.  
    • In 2016 London City Airport began using concentrated flight paths. When there's a predominantly westerly wind, incoming aircraft approach from East London (north of the River). When there's a predominantly Easterly wind, incoming aircraft approach the airport from the West: circling through Forest Hill, Dulwich, Vauxhall, Tower Hamlets, Docklands. This latter flight path affects many of us in South East London. https://www.london.gov.uk/who-we-are/what-london-assembly-does/questions-mayor/find-an-answer/london-city-airport-concentrated-flight-paths The planes going into City are often below 2,000 ft, so very noisy. Sometimes we have incoming Heathrow at the same time, flying higher. The early flights that I hear e.g. 04:30 are incoming to Heathrow. They are scheduled to land at 05:30 but are 'early'. Apparently the government allows a percentage of flights to arrive early and late (but these are now established as regular occurrences, informally part of the schedule). IMHO Londoners are getting very poor political representation on this issue. Incredible that if you want to complain about aircraft noise, you're supposed to contact the airport concerned! Preposterous and designed solely in favour of aviation expansion.
    • Yet another recommendation for Jafar. Such a nice guy, really reliable and fair. He fixed a problem with our boiler and then incredibly kindly made two more visits to replace a different part at no extra cost. 
    • I didn't have any problems with plane noise until city airport started flying planes to and from about 5-8 minutes apart from 5.30 am or  6 am,  and even with ear plugs and double glazing I am woken at about 6 well before I usually would wake  up. I have lived here since 1986 and it is relatively recently that the planes have been flying far too low over East dulwich. I very much doubt that they are headinbg to Heathrow or from Heathrow. As the crow flies we are much , MUCH closer to City Airport than Heathrow or Gatwick. I even saw one flying so low you could see all the windows, when I was in Peckham Rye Park.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...