Jump to content

Recommended Posts

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> cooking doesn't get better than this

>

> Greg must die, he must die, he must die - force

> fed tottaTA until his fat head explodes


ever wondered if greg is a sensitive lover? *


(nah, me neither)


*er....this is a catchphrase right?

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> cooking doesn't get better than this

>

> Greg must die, he must die, he must die - force

> fed tottaTA until his fat head explodes


RosieH, a group of people cook for FatHeadG and JTURD.

Next they get sent (for no discernible reason) to a professional kitchen.

Then they get to cook again for the hosts.

I haven't watched it recently, but assume it's gone the same way as before.

I also assume that they've weated cobs and been subject to some low to medium level humiliation.


And after all that FatHeadG will on occasion deliver his considered and professional opinion that the food is "Yummy".

"Yummy", I ask you?


Does FHG enjoy fish?


Perhaps he might enjoy sharing a table with Luca Brazzi?

ruffers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Nice re Luca.

>

>

> Australian Masterchef - now that was good. Fixed

> but good. Pretty much devoid of catchphrases

> though, sorry.


Although I did hear that one of the contestants used to garnish every dish with a helping of 'pomme frites'.

On doing so he'd wink at the camera and say "Which of course is Frog for scared Englishmen".

He did his best, but it didn't catch on.

From all accounts his chips weren't up to snuff either.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I normally vote Lib Dem and will continue to do so.
    • the reason Tories have lost votes is because they have lost trust primarily. the voters didn't vote for what the Tories did, but what they promised. you can't blame the voters for the outcome, just because they voted for the party. Labour are in a position of influence so we will have to see what they do.  Reform are there, as quite a presence should Labour continue to fail. It feels as if we are on a very thin line
    • I agree with that The voters authorised strong austerity in 2010 and kept voting for it for 14 years - for that reason alone, given Labour have been in power for only months I can't find my else able to equate them as bad as each other. Yet. It may happen and given Labour's poor decision making and comms to date I wouldn't be surprised if they end up that way Problem is the voters say they want one thing (lower prices/better public services/things working) but then don't reward any government that tries to deliver -  and they explicitly said they wanted higher prices with Brexit and lower public services by voting Cons in for 14 years - so they got what they wanted, they just don't like the reality Whoever is elected now has to find a way to address those years of underinvestment and diminished growth - there is no painless way out. But blaming immigration for everything (Reform speciality) is only making everything worse
    • That’s good to know, but it just wasn’t clear to me.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...