Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi all,


Really odd question I know, but I am in need of advice. My daughter is 3years old and she calls her female genital area her 'bottom'. I haven't yet corrected her as I feel that I need to have a suitable/child friendly name for it. As a little girl I called it my 'mini-moo'. Looks hilarious now that I have seen it in written form!

Just thought I'd put it out there and find out how other mums have termed it for their daughter.


Thanks in advance

Seems like you can make up any name you like.... In our house, it's an Eeny.


No idea where that came from. Probably easy to say and a made up word that wouldn't get muddled up with anything else.

kristymac1 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's 'Noo' in our house, when I was a little girl

> it was 'tuppence'. Good god😨😃



That's quite good (noo). 'Tuppence'is a very grand name! Makes a fond memory though!

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seems like you can make up any name you like....

> In our house, it's an Eeny.

>

> No idea where that came from. Probably easy to say

> and a made up word that wouldn't get muddled up

> with anything else.


Yes I agree with having a made up word that wouldn't be muddled up with anything else. Thought about 'Minnie' and then realised that it could get muddled up with Minnie mouse!

devsdev, there's nothing wrong with that.... but what would you have a child call a tummy ache?


Maybe you would enjoy The Vagina Monologues? They're really funny.


http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0244283/

"abdominal pain" (?!)

I do agree that it is best to use correct anatomical language but "vulva" on its own isn't always accurate (though it's good enough usually). Vagina only deals with part of the situation too. It's handy to have a catch all general area reference, I think, (like "tummy" and, I suppose "bum" rather than "anus" or "buttocks") and also to talk through and name the parts pretty matter of factly as well. Especially important for girls I think as there's less on the outside than for boys.



Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> devsdev, there's nothing wrong with that.... but

> what would you have a child call a tummy ache?

>

> Maybe you would enjoy The Vagina Monologues?

> They're really funny.

>

> http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0244283/

Front bottom or wee bottom - as if she ever hurt herself or was in discomfort then she could use that phrase and the general meaning would be understood (e.g by nursery staff/teacher, school nurse)


We avoided vulva, as it doesn't apply to vagina, urethra etc and didn't want to confuse that issue.

Now that she is 5.5y I have started taking the opportunity to talk about periods (e.g when she sees my sanitary products and asks about them) and explaining about he vagina etc. I include my 3.5y old boy in these v.informal chats, too not that he listens!

We use the correct anatomical name for everything so my kids have to learn Latin and anatomy before they can tell me whats wrong with them. Only yesterday my 3 year old came in and told me she had a hematoma on her patella.

oh for goodness sake.....


It's generally known that men have their own affectionate names - which are universally recognized.


Childern have baby names for LOTS of things - I wouldn't necessarily worry them with your adult issues with it.


Having baby names is not the same as saying 'as your mum I'm too embarrassed to explain your genitalia to you'

Devsdev-- sorry to see you removed your posts. I thought the first one was very informative. I imagine there are a lot of adult women who still don't know exactly what a vulva is! Personally, I think nicknames for private parts is a bit silly though that's probably because I didn't grow up using any. Genitals / vagina is fine for kids to say.
Vagina and Penis in this house. Personally I don't really like using euphemisms and I think kids see a difference between using a proper word or a 'baby name' if it's introduced early enough. Caitlin Moran's book How To Be A Woman has a hilarious, if rude, chapter on this by the way!

LondonMix - thank you, I appreciate that. I realised it was a bit rash to delete the posts, but I wasn't intending to cause offence and found the responses quite offensive in turn so wanted out of the conversation. I'll just re-include this link for anyone who's interested in some aides to discussing body/sex with kids as it seems relevant: https://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/product/1406306061/ref=oh_aui_search_detailpage?ie=UTF8&psc=1


And back off for a good weekend now. Hope you all enjoy the sunny Saturday.

Why are you asking complete strangers for names for a 3 year Olds private parts in your eyes you think it's all harmless ask friends or family yes I get that .but you would not go up to a stranger in the street and ask them unless your stupid. Look you don't know who you talk to on these forums , we don't know if your a man or women if anyone don't agree tough

Tbh it's not an unusual topic of conversation in parenting groups. A short search online and through the published parenting lit will readily show that all 'body parts' conversations are common and invariably complex.


There is nothing inherently shameful or weird about openly discussing the topic. In fact, keeping this topic in the dark does more harm than good IMO.


For the record, my daughter is 6 yrs, and she knows the difference between her vulva and vagina. She also know it's sometime called other things. Lots of body parts have more than one name*, but I don't personally think there's any reason not to teach the proper names (and there ARE many good reasons to teach them correct anatomical names). Kids are pretty clever!






*For example, my husband regularly refers to his nose as a 'beak', and when breastfeeding my daughter decided to name my breasts 'beeboos'. My dad calls his feet 'dogs'.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...