Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was certainly going to look into it - perhaps a good opportunity of a month's holiday and being out of London when it's packed out. The East London Line extension from Peckham Rye hopefully should be up and running giving a good route that way to East London.
  • 6 months later...

Article in this week's 'Horse & Hound' (shades of Hugh Grant) talks about accommodation for the Olympics:


Home-stay websites have only just started advertising, but to give an idea of price, currently listed for August 2012 is a self-catering Greenwich apartment for four people in two bedrooms at ?600 per night, and two bedrooms (three beds) within a home two miles from Greenwich, at ?500 including breakfast.


www.homestaylondon2012.com

www.HomeAway.co.uk

www.rentduringthegames.com

www.londonrentmyhouse.com

I'm in the "money isn't everything" camp. I missed the first UK Olympics as I wasn't born, I'll miss the third UK Olympics as I'll be dead - this is my only chance to watch the Olympics in UK. I've planned my tickets purchases, I think we'll see the opening and closing ceremony fireworks from One Tree Hill and the Overground to Dalson is open from HOP. I'm ready.


The possibility of earning maybe ?5,000 (less tax) and missing this one off opportunity doesn't excite me at all.

I have been looking for an olympic rental for the up coming olympics


and see you mention http://www.rentduringthegames.com


I like the way they dont force you to make an account to see prices or even to contact the owner but my question is,

does anyone have any information on this website Good or bad?

Is it ripping off tourists?


Surely price is determined by demand as usual. If supply is less than demand the price increases.....


Provided the price is clear and there are no hidden costs is it really ripping off a tourist that knows the price and chooses to pay it?


It's a hassle moving out of your home and you would forgo the opportunity to live here whilst the Olympics is on ....... if the remuneration isn't worthwhile, people won't allow their home's to be used and supply decreases further!

I dont think London existing hotel accommodation will accommodate all the extra people. If you have a spare room then ?25 per person per night would not be ripping anyone off-anything extra you would have to be turning yourself into a b and b / hotel.

What does everyone else think? is it worth taking the holdiay off work and turning yourself into a b and b for a few weeks??maybe my family can camp in the garden??????????

Running a B&B is slightly different to letting your flat/house I'd say. I guess my dislike of the laws of supply and demand as ClareC put it is that a lot genuine sports fans will not be able to afford to stay in London if prices are hiked. I've read about the hosts of this years Rugby World Cup, New Zealand, where everything is going to be charged so high that a lot of fans who might venture to the bottom of the world are not likely to now. It would be a shame if the Games were only for the wealthy people.

I'm with narnia all the way on this one. I have been to sold out gigs where touts and other fans were selling tickets for 10 x price but with 2 spare tickets i find the fans who obviously cant afford that and sell for cover price.


I've been in the "can't afford" bracket many a time and cant understand why people aree so quick to make a buck at other peoples expense.


It's one of the few times where one gets to freely choose " do I be a cunt or not?". Choosing to do something because others do it is no excuse

Doesn't make sense. Why would you specifically vacate your house during the Olympics, just so you can make "normal" rent on it? You'd give up your home just so sports fans could enjoy the games?


And if you own a rental property anyway... surely you own it with the specific inention of making money?


Try as I might, I just don't see the gig ticket analogy. It's not like you've got something going spare that you don't need any more.

This is all getting a bit holier than thou. Its not like the people paying are without a bob or two, we arent talking about proverty stricken students wanting to get into a gig. We are talking about wealthy, middle class tourists who can afford the ridiculous cost of the tickets for the Olympics, the inflated cost of flights and the costs associated with a holiday in London.


I am no sports fan. I wasnt a supporter of the Olympics, the argument that the games generates economic generation is fatuous. if the money spent on the games had been invested in social housing and economic development work, the same impact would have been had at less cost and hassle.


To add insult to injury we have had to pay the costs of developing the site - twice! Once through general taxation and then again through an additional levy on London Council taxes.


So, if you dont want to watch the games, dont want to put up with the disruption caused by the games and want to avoid the gallons of dribble produced by excitable sports fans - go on holiday and rent your place out, get back some of your money that has been spent on this huge item of niche interest.

Look, people can rent out their gaff if they like, it?s up to them (although if it?s nice enough to command a premium at Olympic time, chances are these people are well off too)


But by the same token it would be nice if these same people didn?t complain about the price of anything else ? it?s only someone else making money right?

Well, yes.


That would seem to be how the ODA have set things up. Its not a "peoples" games at all. Its a "if you can afford the tickets come along, if not, watch the telly like all the other plebs" games.


Nowt to do with me. However, given that, the people looking for accommodation will not be poor.


They may well be able to get to London for pennies now, but not during the Olympics, when prices will be stagged. The "demand" argument will be used to push all bus, train and flight prices through the roof.


Hopefully, somebody will think to open some campsites near the games so that there will be some cheaper places to stay. However, lets not forget that the "economic situation bequeathed to us by the last administration" will yet again be trotted out as an excuse for milking people outrageously thus excluding those with limited incomes.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> so if you don't happen to be well off, bugger off, the Olympics aren't for you?


I understand what you're saying from an ideological point of view, but I don't understand it from a practical perspective. You're not going to help the situation by simply *not* renting out your house. And nobody is going to specifically vacate their home for a few hundred quid. So... what's the solution?

I think university rooms are being rented out for cheaper options.


Through the roof option may be a floating hotel - I think I read that two cruise ships are seeking permission to moor nearby for the duration.


It doesn't bother me what anyone else chooses to do but I'm in the MM camp. Just not sure I can afford the tickets.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Can’t say I approve but equally staff can vote with their feet. Cabs to collect and deliver - not bad.Maybe Gail’s know something none of us do… Having said that, sure those that are walking in and around Dulwich might prefer cake, hot drinks etc in a venue that is not a pub with the noise from over loud punters… so guess one waits and sees…  Do take some pics or let us know if people are popping in… my guess is yes… 
    • OP has perhaps inadvertently provided free advertising for Gails, drawing attention to Dulwich Gails being open on Christmas Day.
    • Staff get taxis in and out and get paid extra (which I think is x2). Some people like to work on Bank Holidays and others don’t. Some people actively avoid Christmas for personal reasons. Long live freedom of choice! 
    • Here is another article from the excellent Special Needs Jungle (SNJ) with tips for responses to the SEND conversation survey. Including shoe horning in EHCPs which they "forget" to ask a question about in the conversation. And living as we do in Southwark with the huge misfortune of 100% academy secondary schools, some thoughts on this and how unlikely inclusion in mainstream is within the current education landscape. Closing date 14 Jan 2026. And please consider a donation to the excellent entirely run by volunteers SNJ. In my view the government could save money by creating some smaller mainstream secondary schools for kids who can cope in primary school but not  with the scale of secondary, and need a calmer less busy setting. The funding would have to be different - it is currently on a per pupil basis which favours larger schools. But it would undoubtedly be cheaper than specialist provision, and the huge cost to individual children and families (emotional and financial) and to society. https://www.specialneedsjungle.com/tips-help-complete-governments-send-conversation-survey-law/ If anyone wants to take a radical step to help their struggling child, my tip is to move far away: these are the best two schools I have ever visited and in a beautiful part of the country. I only wish we'd moved there before it was too late for my son who had to suffer multiple failings at Charter North and then at the hands of Southwark SEND, out of education from February to October in year 10-11, having already suffered the enduring trauma of a very difficult early life, which in combination with ADHD made his time at schools which just don't care so very unbearable for all of us. https://www.cartmelprioryschool.co.uk/ https://settlebeck.org/ As an add on, I would say to anybody considering adoption, please take into account the education battles that you are very much more likely to face than the average parent. First you have schools to deal with, already terrible; then being passed from pillar to post within Southwark Education, SEND, Education Inclusion Team, round and round as they all do their best to explain why they are not responsible and you need someone different, let's hold another multi-agency meeting, never for one minute considering that if they put the child at the centre and used common sense they would achieve a lot more in much less time without loads of Southwark employees sitting in endless meetings with long suffering parents. It is hard to fully imagine this at the start of your adoption journey, full of hope as you are, but truly education is not for the faint hearted, and should be factored into your decision. You'll never hear from people who are really struggling and continue to do so, only from those who've had challenges but overcome them and it's all lovely. And education, the very people who should be there to help, are the ones who make your lives the most hellish out of everything your child and you face.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...