Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I was certainly going to look into it - perhaps a good opportunity of a month's holiday and being out of London when it's packed out. The East London Line extension from Peckham Rye hopefully should be up and running giving a good route that way to East London.
  • 6 months later...

Article in this week's 'Horse & Hound' (shades of Hugh Grant) talks about accommodation for the Olympics:


Home-stay websites have only just started advertising, but to give an idea of price, currently listed for August 2012 is a self-catering Greenwich apartment for four people in two bedrooms at ?600 per night, and two bedrooms (three beds) within a home two miles from Greenwich, at ?500 including breakfast.


www.homestaylondon2012.com

www.HomeAway.co.uk

www.rentduringthegames.com

www.londonrentmyhouse.com

I'm in the "money isn't everything" camp. I missed the first UK Olympics as I wasn't born, I'll miss the third UK Olympics as I'll be dead - this is my only chance to watch the Olympics in UK. I've planned my tickets purchases, I think we'll see the opening and closing ceremony fireworks from One Tree Hill and the Overground to Dalson is open from HOP. I'm ready.


The possibility of earning maybe ?5,000 (less tax) and missing this one off opportunity doesn't excite me at all.

I have been looking for an olympic rental for the up coming olympics


and see you mention http://www.rentduringthegames.com


I like the way they dont force you to make an account to see prices or even to contact the owner but my question is,

does anyone have any information on this website Good or bad?

Is it ripping off tourists?


Surely price is determined by demand as usual. If supply is less than demand the price increases.....


Provided the price is clear and there are no hidden costs is it really ripping off a tourist that knows the price and chooses to pay it?


It's a hassle moving out of your home and you would forgo the opportunity to live here whilst the Olympics is on ....... if the remuneration isn't worthwhile, people won't allow their home's to be used and supply decreases further!

I dont think London existing hotel accommodation will accommodate all the extra people. If you have a spare room then ?25 per person per night would not be ripping anyone off-anything extra you would have to be turning yourself into a b and b / hotel.

What does everyone else think? is it worth taking the holdiay off work and turning yourself into a b and b for a few weeks??maybe my family can camp in the garden??????????

Running a B&B is slightly different to letting your flat/house I'd say. I guess my dislike of the laws of supply and demand as ClareC put it is that a lot genuine sports fans will not be able to afford to stay in London if prices are hiked. I've read about the hosts of this years Rugby World Cup, New Zealand, where everything is going to be charged so high that a lot of fans who might venture to the bottom of the world are not likely to now. It would be a shame if the Games were only for the wealthy people.

I'm with narnia all the way on this one. I have been to sold out gigs where touts and other fans were selling tickets for 10 x price but with 2 spare tickets i find the fans who obviously cant afford that and sell for cover price.


I've been in the "can't afford" bracket many a time and cant understand why people aree so quick to make a buck at other peoples expense.


It's one of the few times where one gets to freely choose " do I be a cunt or not?". Choosing to do something because others do it is no excuse

Doesn't make sense. Why would you specifically vacate your house during the Olympics, just so you can make "normal" rent on it? You'd give up your home just so sports fans could enjoy the games?


And if you own a rental property anyway... surely you own it with the specific inention of making money?


Try as I might, I just don't see the gig ticket analogy. It's not like you've got something going spare that you don't need any more.

This is all getting a bit holier than thou. Its not like the people paying are without a bob or two, we arent talking about proverty stricken students wanting to get into a gig. We are talking about wealthy, middle class tourists who can afford the ridiculous cost of the tickets for the Olympics, the inflated cost of flights and the costs associated with a holiday in London.


I am no sports fan. I wasnt a supporter of the Olympics, the argument that the games generates economic generation is fatuous. if the money spent on the games had been invested in social housing and economic development work, the same impact would have been had at less cost and hassle.


To add insult to injury we have had to pay the costs of developing the site - twice! Once through general taxation and then again through an additional levy on London Council taxes.


So, if you dont want to watch the games, dont want to put up with the disruption caused by the games and want to avoid the gallons of dribble produced by excitable sports fans - go on holiday and rent your place out, get back some of your money that has been spent on this huge item of niche interest.

Look, people can rent out their gaff if they like, it?s up to them (although if it?s nice enough to command a premium at Olympic time, chances are these people are well off too)


But by the same token it would be nice if these same people didn?t complain about the price of anything else ? it?s only someone else making money right?

Well, yes.


That would seem to be how the ODA have set things up. Its not a "peoples" games at all. Its a "if you can afford the tickets come along, if not, watch the telly like all the other plebs" games.


Nowt to do with me. However, given that, the people looking for accommodation will not be poor.


They may well be able to get to London for pennies now, but not during the Olympics, when prices will be stagged. The "demand" argument will be used to push all bus, train and flight prices through the roof.


Hopefully, somebody will think to open some campsites near the games so that there will be some cheaper places to stay. However, lets not forget that the "economic situation bequeathed to us by the last administration" will yet again be trotted out as an excuse for milking people outrageously thus excluding those with limited incomes.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> so if you don't happen to be well off, bugger off, the Olympics aren't for you?


I understand what you're saying from an ideological point of view, but I don't understand it from a practical perspective. You're not going to help the situation by simply *not* renting out your house. And nobody is going to specifically vacate their home for a few hundred quid. So... what's the solution?

I think university rooms are being rented out for cheaper options.


Through the roof option may be a floating hotel - I think I read that two cruise ships are seeking permission to moor nearby for the duration.


It doesn't bother me what anyone else chooses to do but I'm in the MM camp. Just not sure I can afford the tickets.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...