Jump to content

Gay Wedding Cake Case


Loz

Recommended Posts

Is it me, or has this case potentially opened a very big can of worms?


I could fully understand that, had it been a real gay wedding cake requested (as I originally thought) then finding a case of discrimination would be obvious.


But this was different. This was a request for a cake to bear a political message that the owners found offensive. But it was still seen as discrimination. What will we see next - a bakery owner by black people forced to create a cake with a white supremacist message? A Jewish bakery forced to bake a cake bearing a 'vote Corbyn' message?


Not sure we've heard the last of this one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Is it me, or has this case potentially opened a

> very big can of worms?

>

> I could fully understand that, had it been a real

> gay wedding cake requested (as I originally

> thought) then finding a case of discrimination

> would be obvious.

>

> But this was different. This was a request for a

> cake to bear a political message that the owners

> found offensive. But it was still seen as

> discrimination. What will we see next - a bakery

> owner by black people forced to create a cake with

> a white supremacist message? A Jewish bakery

> forced to bake a cake bearing a 'vote Corbyn'

> message?

>

> Not sure we've heard the last of this one.


The examples you give are promoting race hate. The other isn't.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does seem excessive that the law feels the need to intervene. The bakery had nothing nice to say ? the law apparently doesn't afford them the right to say nothing at all. It's not like they have banned anyone from buying their soda farls or gur cakes.


I even admire them a bit for standing by their convictions, however silly the convictions are. They could have just refused the order giving any number of other excuses (e.g. We don't like your requested design / we're busy"). Being honest instead is an honourable offence really.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A bakery owner by black people forced to create a cake with a white supremacist message?

> A Jewish bakery forced to bake a cake bearing a 'vote Corbyn' message?


Do you really think these two are examples of the same type of thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A Jewish bakery could refuse to bake a cake that says Vote Corbyn as this would not be illegal discrimination due to race/ gender/ religion/ sexual orientation, so if they wished they could say no and despite what the Daily Fail says the Jewish population in the U.K. do have a range of political beliefs. http://www.jlm.org.uk/cable_street_80.

If a bakery made a cake that prompted race hatred it would be against the law, so they could also refuse.

No can of worms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> > What will we see next - a bakery

> > owner by black people forced to create a cake

> > with a white supremacist message? A Jewish bakery

> > forced to bake a cake bearing a 'vote Corbyn'

> > message?

> >

> > Not sure we've heard the last of this one.

>

> The examples you give are promoting race hate. The

> other isn't.



Since when was saying 'Vote Corbyn' promoting race hate?...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My gut reaction was that it was the right decision. They weren't being asked to endorse the message, just reproduce it on a cake. A victory for common sense over prejudice and superstition.


But it does beg a wider question - should a print facility, sign fabricator, advertising company, or indeed a baker be obliged to accept any order within certain parameters (e.g. it's legal, not intrinsically offensive, etc)?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What was interesting for me was that the case showed up my own prejudices.


Until I saw a picture of the bakers on Facebook, on hearing them described as anti-gay Christians I had assumed that they were grizzly old people.


Just goes to show.


But from a legal point of view, apart from anything else, it seems to me to have been the right decision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think I'm with Peter Tatchell. Here's a closer analogy I think: a white baker refuses to make a cake for two black customers which says "Support Black Lives Matter" on it. Is the baker guilty of race discrimination? I don't think so ? after all, it's perfectly possible to be black and be vehenmently opposed to Black Lives Matter. In the same way, it's perfectly possible to be gay and opposed to gay marriage. What if it had been two gay bakers who were anti-gay marriage and who refused to make the cake...?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't read the full judgment but I understand that the key points were that (i) making the cake did not imply endorsement of the message (ii) the business discriminated between messages they were willing to put on cakes and those they weren't, based on their own beliefs and (iii) the message they refused to put on was supportive of a position likely to be strongly associated with a protected characteristic i.e. being gay makes you very likely to support gay marriage.


There will be lots of other circumstances that look the same but don't fit with these points so may be decided differently. However, it does (it seems to me) draw a fairly bright line between commercial activities and other parts of life - when you are engaged in the former you are very likely to have to put your beliefs to one side and deal with the customer.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had the pleasure of being brought up surrounded by these religious freaks, who live in the dark ages and think that religion should be the law.

Whilst this case seems relatively benign it represents a much greater underlying problem and that's why the case is an important marker and the right decision


You can't be open for business and only provide a service to those of the same belief as yourself - otherwise it's the road to lawful discrimination.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My thoughts exactly, particularly the example of hate speech which no one, black, white or otherwise would legally be compelled to replicate.




miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > A bakery owner by black people forced to create

> a cake with a white supremacist message?

> > A Jewish bakery forced to bake a cake bearing a

> 'vote Corbyn' message?

>

> Do you really think these two are examples of the

> same type of thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Pudding rice used to be in the same aisle as tinned fruit if that helps?? My preference is the Sainsburys fruit and veg aisle over Morrison any day of the week and Lidl, although I adore Lidl for other things they sell and their speciality weeks.  However Sainsburys size of peppers varies (small to moderate) week to week but the price remains constant, fresh mushrooms are hit and miss, some weeks they have them other weeks what's there I wouldn't touch with a barge pole. Gave up on the oranges as they also became much smaller but at the same price.  Nectar is a money saver compared o the price without the Nectar reduction. That's the same for all four of the big brand supermarkets. It may have flaws but saving money is what its about. Just some thoughts.  
    • I also had an awful experience there last month. The hairdresser started cutting my child’s hair before even knowing what kind of cut we wanted, and when I started to say what I would like, she said that she knows what she’s doing and just continued. They were also incredibly rude about the fact that I’d brought a buggy with me, and had no patience when my child started to get even a little distracted. Just very unfriendly. 
    • Interesting take mal  Maybe the reduction in spending to 50% by the government on active travel is a sensible reaction to the expected boom not happening.  After all when money is short, why waste it on schemes that aren't being used as much as expected, thereby cutting your cloth accordingly and redirecting the money where its needed more.  You can build so much cycling inferstructure but as they say you can lead a horse to water but you can't make it drink.  Whilst more active travel is an admirable goal, if people don't want to go that route and with the weather in this country, then its hard to see it expanding much more than it has already. 
    • Article is about Government enabling cycling, which would be a good thing.  Sadly Sunak doesn't like active travel and public transport and wants to win votes by appealing to hard line motorists.  His days are numbered. If you look at Johnson's manifesto he had failed on most pledges the most spectacular being delivering the benefits of Brexit.  He also failed on free cycle training for all children. Barriers to increased cycling include larger cars and poor driving standards.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...