Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I always thought jam jars were wank until I went calling on Doc Watson a couple of years before he died, he offered apple juice in jam jars no explanation given. Seemed normal at his and other local cabins.

Maybe there's a place for jam jars cos it felt correct, but Deep Gap, NC, ain't Peckham I suppose !!

Since then though I like jam jars to drink from, probably for nostalgic reasons.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> What really amuses me is that now, in places like

> Wilko, you can get glasses made to look like jam

> jars, complete with metal lids and holes punched

> in the lids for a straw :))



Actually, I'd never thought of the lid / straw thing. That could actually make more sense if you were at a festival or somewhere you might spill drink.


But in a bar? Nah.

I thought jam jars were traditionally used for cocktails when they were invented in new orleans or something, back in the day. Hence the explosion of them over here. Ah, for some reason that reminds me of the furore over the Actress opening/serving wine in tumblers :))
What gets my goat are the Bet365 adverts with professional cockney actor Ray Winstone especially when he says: "And I bet responsibly." Yeah, right. I want to kick him up the arse every time it comes on, which is during every commercial break when the football's on. Grrr!

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jam jars are for jam.


The other thing they get used for a lot hereabouts is as candle holders for people who are organising their own wedding reception on a budget and going for the village fete / vintage / WI look. There's almost always someone looking in the Wanted section.


Also good for holding tealights if you're eating outside on a summer evening.

Jah Lush Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What gets my goat are the Bet365 adverts with

> professional cockney actor Ray Winstone especially

> when he says: "And I bet responsibly." Yeah,

> right. I want to kick him up the arse every time

> it comes on, which is during every commercial

> break when the football's on. Grrr!



That and that ex Liverpool player doing property investment forums


You know the one, Robbie fat lips ham head.

Inkmaiden Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I could be wrong but I thought the jam jar thing

> came about from mimicking Prohibition era

> speakeasy bars when they brewed/served alcohol in

> jam jars to disguise it.



Ink,

You are not wrong, drinking warm whiskey owt a jar has always been acceptable and in fact optimal.

Seabag Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > What gets my goat are the Bet365 adverts with

> > professional cockney actor Ray Winstone

> especially

> > when he says: "And I bet responsibly." Yeah,

> > right. I want to kick him up the arse every

> time

> > it comes on, which is during every commercial

> > break when the football's on. Grrr!

>

>

> That and that ex Liverpool player doing property

> investment forums

>

> You know the one, Robbie fat lips ham head.



To be fair, he does actually know a bit about property investment.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Seabag Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------


> > That and that ex Liverpool player doing

> property

> > investment forums

> >

> > You know the one, Robbie fat lips ham head


> To be fair, he does actually know a bit about

> property investment.


The Robbie Fowler Property Academy is run by a Florida based company, Legacy Education Alliance. Fowler has licensed his name to the company (you won't find him on stage either).

Initial sessions are free, with in-depth training for wannabe landlords charged at around ?1,000. The academy promises Fowler students ?investment strategies? in ?social housing, buy-to-let, lease options and land development".


His wife runs their property business and always has.

  • 3 weeks later...
Back to the shop, as the original post began, today there's a large sign saying "Bric a brac half price". But when I selected a piece, it wasn't half price. Wrong sort of bric a brac. Nowhere did it explain some pieces were off limit. Why can't they learn something basic about the retail trade? Or is it me?

Lynne Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Back to the shop, as the original post began,

> today there's a large sign saying "Bric a brac

> half price". But when I selected a piece, it

> wasn't half price. Wrong sort of bric a brac.

> Nowhere did it explain some pieces were off limit.

> Why can't they learn something basic about the

> retail trade? Or is it me?



No, it's not you, it's at least several of us.


Did you ask them why it was the wrong sort of bric a brac, and what was the right sort?!


Does anybody know if the same person manages both the large and the small hospice shops in Lordship Lane, as the larger one seems to be run more efficiently, at least lately and in my experience.

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Jah Lush Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Jam jars are for jam.

>

> Also good for holding tealights if you're eating

> outside on a summer evening.



Back to jam jars, I once actually bought (from the late lamented Grace and Favour, I think it was) two or three pretty little glass jars specifically sold for hanging up outside with tealights in.


They looked lovely in the garden. For a while. But .....


As soon as the metal container bits of the tealights got hot at the bottom, all the jars shattered :(

lavender27 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sue Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > lavender27 Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Rational rage for certain "Tinnitus"

> >

> >

> > Eh?!

>

> look it up




I know what tinnitus is.

Sue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> lavender27 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Sue Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > lavender27 Wrote:

> > >

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> >

> > > -----

> > > > Rational rage for certain "Tinnitus"

> > >

> > >

> > > Eh?!

> >

> > look it up

>

> I know what tinnitus is.


Well, it kind of rings a bell...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...