Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I went in for the first time yesterday and I can see why the upstairs should be child free as it looks, IMO, distinctly like a Cajun brothel.


Anyway there were plenty of little people downstairs. One who was in particularly good voice. The loud screaming was a bit abrasive but a much more appropriate response to the state of the world than the rubbish that comes out of the mouths of many adults.


Mrs B doesn?t share my opinion re. the Cajun brothel thing but then she doesn?t share my opinion that leaving a pair of socks on the floor is artistic realism.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> and what you appear to want is to play with the

> font controls available...

>

> Kids can get on my wick big time but the sort of

> thing:

>

>

>

> is:

>

> a) exaggerated

>

> b) pompous

>

> 3) pointless

>

> "it's my right" my a... foot. get over yourself.

>

> As has been pointed out many a time - this

> particular place has an upstairs without any

> "nappy valley" infection. Both sides happy..

> 'kay???

>

> I don't want kids but I'm beginning to think I'll

> have some JUST to hack some people off...


Your the man Sean! You finally got off the fence and risked offending people. Great post.


As for having kids. I am confident that you would be an excellent father and are exactly the sort of person who should be having kids. I doubt that you'd regret it but you might have to spend a bit less time bevvying...

I think Bob must be referring to Hillbilly rather than Cajun so is a few hundred miles off to the North East of where I was referring to. But his holidays in the old US of A sound interesting. Anyway I?m going off topic.


Go upstairs at The Charndellier and you will see what I mean.

just read through this thread and how is it that a new tea shop opening can turn into (yet another) debate on children v no children?


the place serves tea and (lovely) cakes. go enjoy the place - if you want to. some people have kids, and others don't. each are allowed to take their kids (or themselves if they dont have kids) to wherever they want to. people should relax a bit more and dont forget the most important thing -there are some nice cakes there, by not going because you dont like the kids around you are depriving yourself! go sit upstairs and enjoy them in peace.

DaveR said "LL may well now be far less welcoming place for the childless (or indeed the elderly or those with low incomes) than it was say 10 years ago."


I don't have any children and love LL. And to be honest, with a few exceptions, I generally love seeing lots of kids around the place and hopefully will add one or two of my own in time. I'm saving up for the bugaboo already...


Seriously though, I'm not sure the above is specific to ED. London generally is probably not a great place to be if you are elderly or on a low income. And I think ED is one of the better parts of London, whoever you are. He who is tired of ED is tired of life, as Pepys would have said if he'd lived here.

I think that may have been Johnson, but totally agree with the sentiment.


Pepys' best pal and my great great [snip] great great grandad, John Evelyn was known to wander round these parts too.

He was also something of a lush and would thoroughly approve of today's LL!!

Marmora Man

"Get real - everyone has a choice. The variety of restuarants, bars, pubs and clubs in ED is such that all tastes are catered for. If you don't like the company go elsewhere - but don't criticise other parts of the community for being part of the community."


You make a very good point indeed. I hope that this remains the case in East Dulwich i.e. cheap and cheerful places amongst the trendy, unpractical and expensive places. However, I have a foreboding that things will change. And quickly. Almost all the pubs are now gastro trendy, but I have to admit it is all good for property prices(!).


ED is definitely the nicest part of SE London IMO. It makes it very difficult to move anywhere else.


However, people should be allowed to have a view on the 'mummy' types on this forum, whether they are pro or anti them, without getting a lot of vitriol. Free speech and all that?


(By the way, I have no problem with anyone as long as they are friendly and respectful be they a 'mummy', an estate agent...although the guy in the health food shop next to the cheese shop is always very surly when I go in!).


The tea shop sounds a nice addition and I will check it out. At least it is not an estate agent or a shop selling ornaments.

macroban, that's why you will have to avoid the trendy, expensive places and hang out in the greasy spoons - like me!!! The point was that at least there still are cheap places amongst the trendy and expensive places. But how long will that last?


People have said this tea shop is very expensive....so I may have to contend with drinking tea at home. Unless someone else is paying, of course.

Actually I did read earlier in the thread to check out prices of this tea shop, and on second thoughts I might give it a miss.


"....is ?25 not a little exorbitant for 2 sandwiches and 2 teas?"


Er, yes it IS! This should come to no more than a ?8, I'd say.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...