Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I agree it's definitely the knowing people have been in your home and the sentimental items that are taken that's the worst. I think I've only seen my dad cry twice, and one of which was when he was telling me how the burglars had stolen the cufflinks his mum had bought him for his 21st birthday. God now I'm getting a bit teary too. Utter scumbags

ontheedge Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Hi sorry to hear about this, I do suggest if you

> are offered victim support do take them up on the

> security advice I found them brilliant fitted new

> locks spyhole window alarms etc. all for free.

> They are a charity so are open to donations.


I was offered victim support after an attempted burglary last year (I was in at the time and the brilliant police caught him and went to prison for a few months) but at the time I just assumed victim support meant councilling etc so I just said no. I wish I'd realised at the time that they could have helped with security, so anyone who is offered victim support do take it.

Yes I'd take up the offer of victim support as well. I hope these guys get caught. And if they are caught I hope the OP is prepared to go to court and help to secure a conviction. Quite often people either can't be bothered or are maybe frightened to go through this process. This then can then end up with the burglar getting a slap on the wrist in the form of a caution.

sophiesofa Wrote:

-----------------------------------------------------

> I was offered victim support after an attempted

> burglary last year...but at the time I just assumed

> victim support meant councilling etc so I just

> said no. I wish I'd realised at the time that

> they could have helped with security...


I declined their services for the same reason SS...ended up spending almost ?1,000 on security (the bulk of that being on a solid steel door):-S. Still, that was when I was living in Herne Hill...so far so good in ED.


I too hope they catch them james84.

I really hope they catch them James.. Same thing happened to me at West Hampstead when I lived there, they completely cleaned us out, hardest part was they stole jewellery that my dad had given me from when him and my mum were married.. Never did catch the a$$holes but all I can say is sorry it happened to you mate..


x

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Disclaimer, some of the later  SMB stuff is insipid but I like this.  I
    • I'm pleased to have gone onto a meter as it has saved us money.  When first fitted we found there was a leak and TW replaced the old lead pipe with plastic (we had to pay the last few metres into the house but some geezer did this at a fair price). No doubt others have positive experiences too.   Otherwise I'm no fan of the private utilities but that shouldn't colour our opinions.  
    • I recall that when the meter was installed it it was not set at zero. Presumably it had come from elsewhere or was a recon one.    Same here. I phoned TW today to ask if there was a meter at our property (even though I knew there was) and I was told quite categorically that there was not and that our bill was calculated on RV value When I asked why we used to get our meter readings shown online in our account, It they could not provide an explanation. Our RV value according to TW is 547 which equated to a 4-5 bedroom property with a large garden. With just two of us living here then our consumption must be well below the expected volume. Given the facts, I am totally convinced no that TW have an algorithm that hides the actual meter readings when the actual consumption is below the RV based consumption suggesting they are a bunch of shameless rogues!!  
    • Let me get this straight . The OP  was hit from behind by a small person out of control on a bike whose father was not only not watching him but could not watch him, because he was not in a position to see him. Are you disputing that "side of the story"? Why would someone who rarely posts on here come on here to post that? Then the OP remonstrated with the father. What would you have done in that situation?  You seem absolutely determined to put the OP in the wrong.  What exactly is your motive in doing that? Do you always assume that someone is lying when you haven't heard "both sides of the story"? Do you always disbelieve anything you are told because there are so "many possibilities"? The father in question is hardly likely to come on here to defend his lack of care of his child, is he?  And btw there were no "casual onlookers". The people who laughed were apparently the child's father and those with him. Who did not witness  "someone being smacked into by a 4 year old on a bike" because the child was out of their line of sight. It seems that you can't even get right something which is posted on a forum and there in writing for all to see. Let's hope you are never called as a witness in a court case.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...