Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Good news. If I re-mortgage my house, borrow some money from the bank, sell everything I own on ebay and get a part time job in the evenings, then I may be able to afford a ticket for The Stones at the O2 next month. Greedy bastards. I am going to their new film - Crossfire Hurricane - this Thursday night. That's probably as close as I'll get to them (?25 a ticket), because I'm not shelling out ?406 for the O2.


My absolute favourite band at the moment is Of Monsters and Men. ?14 a ticket. That's more like it.

Outrageous prices for the Stones gigs. Appalling that the tickets are out of the price range of most real fans and will probably end up in the hands of the corporate suits out with their secretaries. How they can justify this is beyond me. 50th celebration it may be but there's no way I'm paying that even if I could afford it.
I saw Steely Dan in Birmingham a few years ago and it was about ?20. Also Metallica and Machine Head at the O2 was much cheaper about ?25 a couple of years ago- I know that the Pussy Cat Dolls charged about ?75 at the O2 but I expect that was to fund their umpteen changes of clothes- this is ridiculous- I am content that I saw the Stones for free in Hyde Park 40-odd years ago.
There'll be doing other gigs after these "anniversary" shows later on and I wouldn't think they'll be as expensive as these ones. Probably nearer the ?75 - ?150 mark. I've seen 'em eight or nines times now since '76 and they've always been amazing live. Still, having said that I hate arena shows and I'd rather see a band in a small club and to see them in a small club would be the nuts.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm excited to go and see Shonen Knife tonight.

>

> As the excellent Simon Price says, "There are two

> types of people: those who enjoy thrashy Japanese

> girl-punk, and those who have something wrong with

> them."

>

> Come along!


I saw them last year at the Brixton Windmill playing a set of Ramones covers!

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...
Ticket prices well outside the reach of Joe Normal but the Stones are getting great reviews (as opposed to the usual "good") from even some of the most cynical music journos for last nights performance. And the peeps in my office who went last night back this up. Was anyone lucky enough to go?

The tickets are so expensive because they're greedy bastards. Also, Richard Branson is paying them a huge amount of money for these gigs so he's raking in the money on ticket prices.


I'm going on Thursday. I wouldn't cross the street to say hello to any of them but I'm dizzy with excitement about the prospect of seeing Thursday's gig. Can't stop playing 40 licks.

I wish Jah! Reckon you'd be a brilliant person to go with.


I hope this Thursday is as good as the reviews say Sunday was. Gimme Shelter was top of my list for Thursday but I'm not sure they'll do it because they had Mary J Blige to help out with that one and I don't think she'll do a repeat.


The thing that's annoyed me most in the run up to these gigs (even more annoying than the ticket prices) has been the anti-ageism that always accompanies any Stones activity (and has done for decades). Anti-ageism is the final frontier. These days you can't have an overt pop at someone for being black, or female or disabled; but you can still stick the welly in because someone's old. People need to wise up to the fact that every one of us is going that way.


This is their 50th year and, yes, they should be giving fans a break on ticket prices. But they've never looked after their fans so I guess it's expecting too much for them to start now. I think the ticket prices are embarrassing but I also think the comments people make about them being too old/too wrinkly are embarrassing.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
    • Looking for crate/toys/play pen etc. Ideally will buy in a bundle. Can collect!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...