Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So of all the characters a gifted comic can play, that's the one? Really????


As a complete aside, I am getting really hacked off with this new use of ~"Really?". Sort of pronounced Rreeaaly?


Not a dig at you Sean, a good mate has started doing it all the bloody time, because his new bird uses it a lot.


Very annoying!

I had the misfortune of working for Top Gear magazine, and consequently ran across Clarkson with more regularity than is healthy.


Suffice to say that he's not playing a character, that's him. He's so obnoxious it's almost perverse.


He was fliming down one end of our carpark, and we were down the other - around 100 yards away - having our usual fag break. He completely lost it because he thought we were looking at him. We were subject to a tirade of abuse and then forbidden from smoking when Clarkson was around.


What a prat.



Exactly !!! With everyone rushing to say he is playing a character I started to think I was going mad


Ok, my or Huguenot?s opinion isn?t going to prove anything ? but if it happened to be the case that Clarkson really doesn?t believe what he comes out with, does that change his supporters? viewpoint?

I do really enjoy watching Top Gear though, not because I 'like' or 'admire' Clarkson, I like the premise of the programme.


It appeals to me at a really base level, the rebellious little schoolboy inside who gets off on seeing how many burgers he can fit in his mouth, or bullying the goofy kid.

he's a cunt, he's a cunt, he's a big fat cunt, he's the biggest fattest cunt in the whole wide world...


Good, never believed for a second he was somehow "method acting". I know too many people who think like him, but aren't given the print and broadcast platforms to air their noxious ramblings. Adding a humorous veneer makes his poisonous rants no less toxic.


Twatola of the first order.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I do really enjoy watching Top Gear though, not

> because I 'like' or 'admire' Clarkson, I like the

> premise of the programme.

>

> It appeals to me at a really base level, the

> rebellious little schoolboy inside who gets off on

> seeing how many burgers he can fit in his mouth,

> or bullying the goofy kid.


Ditto.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I had the misfortune of working for Top Gear

> magazine, and consequently ran across Clarkson

> with more regularity than is healthy.

>

> Suffice to say that he's not playing a character,

> that's him. He's so obnoxious it's almost

> perverse.

>

> He was fliming down one end of our carpark, and we

> were down the other - around 100 yards away -

> having our usual fag break. He completely lost it

> because he thought we were looking at him. We were

> subject to a tirade of abuse and then forbidden

> from smoking when Clarkson was around.

>

> What a prat.

____________________________________


So, were you or weren't you looking at him ?


W**F

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I do really enjoy watching Top Gear though, not

> because I 'like' or 'admire' Clarkson, I like the

> premise of the programme.

>

> It appeals to me at a really base level, the

> rebellious little schoolboy inside who gets off on

> seeing how many burgers he can fit in his mouth,

> or bullying the goofy kid.


And that Brian May is dead sexy.

RosieH Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Carnell. I'm shocked.


What? We all have guilty pleasures and I'm afraid this is mine. James May is the only likeable presenter on it but I just can't help but find it entertaining.


I don't buy Clarkson books or read his columns but once a week, for an hour, I find the combination of cars, crashes, explosions and minor celebrity a blessed relief from the world of high-culture that I normally inhabit. One can go to too many performances of Swan Lake you know.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda and far more across their briefs than any minister I've seen in years. The consensus was that Labour are so unpopular and untrusted by the electorate already, as are the Conservatives, that breaking the manifesto pledge on income tax wouldn't drive their approval ratings any lower, so they should, and I quote, 'Roll The Dice', hope for the best and see where we are in a couple of years time. As a strategy, i don't know whether I find that quite worrying or just an honest appraisal of what most governments actually do in practice.
    • They are a third of the way through their term Earl. It's no good blaming other people anymore. They only have three years left to fix what is now their own mess. And its not just lies in the manifesto. There were lies at the last budget too, when they said that was it, they weren't coming back for more tax and more borrowing. They'd already blamed the increase in NIC taxes on what they claimed was a thorough investigation. They either knew everything then or they lied about that too .   They need to stop lying and start behaving. If they don't the next government won't be theirs, it will be led by Nigel Farage.  They have to turn it round rapidly. Blaming other people, telling lies and breaking promises isn't going to cut it any more.
    • Is it lame? Or is it Lamey? (sorry)
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...