Jump to content

Has posting on this forum hindered your employment prospects?


Recommended Posts

Remember that there's no shame in posting a few thousand times on internet forums - only in deleting your posts afterwards, like a fool.


Moreover, if you're going to look at the porn, you might as well be having a w@nk as well. You're only fooling yourself otherwise. Think about it Alan. You're only fooling yourself.

No. In fact if I didn't periodically dip in and out of the threads on here over lunch I might end up caving one of my colleague's heads in with my magic mouse. So, posting (or at least reading) on this forum seems to have actually helped my employment prospects...and technically those of a number of my colleagues' as well :D

Oh possibly.


But there is significant mileage in Alan's inability to deal with his own past postings.


A head doctor would have a field day.


I read once that sociopaths show a consistent problem with looking in the loo after they've had a number 2. Apparently they can't accept 'this is wot I haz dun'.


There's nothing particularly pooey about Alan Dale's past postings, he just consistently made pronouncements that were consequently proved to be foolish.


Most of us have a chuckle and scratch our armpits, seeing both the humour in our ambition and rueing our misled convictions.


Not Alan Dale.


Alan Dale pretends it never fecking happened. IT NEVER FECKING HAPPENED RIGHT. FECKING PROVE IT. YOU CAN'T FECKING FIND IT. FECKING PROVE IT. I NEVER FECKING SAID THAT. IF YOU CAN'T FECKING FIND IT I NEVER FECKING SAID IT RIGHT. I'M FECKING RIGHT I SAID.


If Alan Dale wasn't such a tragedy I might even have a chuckle. ;-)

Ha ha Axeman. :))


There's a great scene in 'American Psycho' where Patrick Bateman flexes his bicep in the mirror whilst having sex, before pointing at himself in faux adulation.


It illustrates in one timeless moment the shallow pointless delusion of his life. He hides himself behind vacuous cartoon representations of masculinity. He has to admire himself, because he is so worthless and self-centred that he attracts no admiration from others.


He elevates himself above other people with a boastful petulance that precisely exposes his essential failure, he cannot accept that he is the architect of his own misery.


He attracts both disgust and pity in equal measure.


http://singlarity.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/patrick.jpg?w=300&h=363

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...