Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hello

Thinking about moving to the ED area with two young preschoolers. Having he minefield of narrowing down where to live and what school argh. Obviously will visit schools but as we don't know where to start it would be really great if anyone has any advice on any schools to avoid! Plus any schools they would recommend. I would love a school that is in the middle - not too hothousey but not overly laid back. Forest school would be great and/or emphasis on being active. Nurturing and warm staff the priority. Looking around ED, WD, Herne Hill, Forest Hill and Peckham Rye.

Thank you!!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/136433-primary-school-advice/
Share on other sites

Sorry, I don't have personal experience of those schools, but just wanted to say that when I was looking for schools for my daughter, I found thoroughly reading the schools' websites to be useful in addition to visits.


Also keep in mind that catchments are very small for many schools. So unless you're moving almost next door to certain schools, the likelihood of getting a place can diminish rapidly with distance.


Best of luck. xx

I have no experience of it but I've heard Fairlawn has a Forest School type approach. The schools in Honor Oak and Forest Hill are all good as are all the ones in Dulwich. I wouldn't worry about avoiding any schools but for convenience sake it might be worth trying to avoid blackholes as it can be a bit more stressful come admission time.


I live in ED and the 5 or 6 roads south of Whately have the greatest choice of schools. In any given year, depending on exactly where you are, you may be in the catchment of: Heber Primary, Goodrich, Harris ED and Dulwich Hamlet.


The houses and gardens in that stretch can be on the smaller side of average for this area though so I'd just find a house that suits your needs as the schools are all generally good.

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/education/school-sat-tables-results-for-every-london-state-primary-a3421116.html

Sure you've seen but this lists out the primary school results out by borough so you can search Lambeth (Herne Hill) and Southwark (East and West Dulwich) - makes it very easy.


We're in Herne Hill - got some great local schools. Jessops and Bessemer Grange which are not church schools and Corpus Christi which is catholic.


Good luck!

My son goes to Rosendale in West Dulwich/ Herne Hill. It's a great school; has high standards without putting pressure on the kids. Take a look at the website for more info, each class has a blog and there are blogs for other things, including the forest school and various after school clubs. Gives you a good idea about what the school is about.


http://www.rosendale.cc/school-life/class-blogs/

Harris Primary East Dulwich does Forest school sessions in reception, in the grounds of Alleyn's. I always got the impression that Horniman Primary did lots of that kind of thing...


As other posters have said, we're so lucky to have so many good primary schools in ED and surrounds. I can't think of a school that doesn't have its own tribe of supportive families.


The other thing I found helpful when looking at schools was to look up their PTA websites and / or Facebook pages - it can give a different insight into the school community.


Good luck with your search!

I don't have any direct experience of local schools yet as I also have a preschooler but I've been to a few open days mainly around Forest Hill and this is what I've thought:


Horniman is great for being so small and for having it's own forest area which seems to mean they do more of that sort of thing than most other schools. They also run a lot of lunchtime and after school clubs. Very small catchment though.


Fairlawn is raved about by lots of people in SE23, it seems to get great results and has been consistently good for a long time so it's a pretty safe bet. Catchment is very small - about 300 metres max I think. It's likely to be bigger in 2017 as they are apparently having a bulge year. Downsides - There is limited outside space so I think one of the two weekly PE lessons is often held in the classroom. And lunchtime

play is or will have to be staggered as there is not enough space for the whole school to be playing outside at once.


Harris East Dulwich is new and increasingly popular as confidence grows. The catchment may shrink massively over the next couple of years because of this. Harris will also have to stagger outside play I am told as the playground is small but I believe they are negotiating use of on another school's playground. The children learn mandarin which was extremely cute to see and probably more useful than French which is still taught elsewhere. I think some

people still feel it's a bit of a risk as it's a new school but parents of children there speak highly of the school.


Ivydale (Nunhead) will be very big but split over two sites so may not feel that way. The catchment should grow for 2017 as they are taking an extra form.


My favourite of all the schools I saw was Eliot Bank which is more the Sydenham side of Forest Hill so may be too far out of your chosen areas. It gets great results but at the same

time just seemed so friendly and relaxed. For a school that is academically high acheiving I found that really

refreshing. Sadly we do not live near enough to that one.


Hope that helps a little!

Kilmorie In Forest hill.I would say just visit all in Forest hill.Domain is great ,Fairlawn,Eliot bank,too many. Kilmore has no uniform,arty community feeling,outdoor day and say that boys outperform girls for first time as there is more outside play,so they will implement as much as they can outdoor learning.Too happy with our move.I have been visiting lots of private and public to make the move choice.Good luck and pm if you want to

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Amazing. Now could you cut and paste an AI summary of the defence case for Andrew M-W? 
    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
    • Malumbu, do you happen to know what the current figure is for "trips into town made by walking, cycling and public transport"? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...