Jump to content

Recommended Posts

This is a serious issue that should not be treated lightly. A friend has a son (now adult) who is blind in one eye as a result of catching toxocara canis from dog faeces when he was a child. Children stepping on dog faeces in the street are therefore at risk.


I can confirm TheCat's observation that Beauval, Dovercourt and parts of Woodward road are particularly badly affected by this anti-social problem.

Dog duck Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But we all see Louisa constantly relieving herself

> all over this forum?



Yawn. You seem a little obsessed, maybe you should find something else to talk about? Perhaps keep the thread on topic for a start?


Louisa.

woodstock Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> On Friday morning I discovered a large dog poop on

> the pavement directly outside my house on

> Dovercourt Road. Fortunately I recently installed

> a CCTV system and have photos of the dog "in

> action" and its owner - conveniently staring at

> his mobile.

>

> Do you know them?

>

> People like this should be named and shamed - and

> fined by the council.


You need to get a life mate!


Its a 7 second job with a bucket of water! If selfish people like you stopped paving over their gardens so they can park their precious cars then dogs might not need to take a dump on the pavement.

uncleglen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> TheCat must be very young to not realise how

> selfish and and inconsiderate some dog owners, and

> most cat owners are. To wilfully own a pet that

> devastates wildlife on a grand scale and wrecks

> other peoples' enjoyment of their own garden is

> the height of laziness and inconsideration- I

> personally don't know how they sleep at night

> while Tiddles is out on the prowl.....



Brexshitting again !

Toosmart1973 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> You need to get a life mate!

>

> Its a 7 second job with a bucket of water! If

> selfish people like you stopped paving over their

> gardens so they can park their precious cars then

> dogs might not need to take a dump on the

> pavement.


as opposed to the 7 second job of the dog owner to pick up his own dog's shite?

Toosmart1973 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> woodstock Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > On Friday morning I discovered a large dog poop

> on

> > the pavement directly outside my house on

> > Dovercourt Road. Fortunately I recently

> installed

> > a CCTV system and have photos of the dog "in

> > action" and its owner - conveniently staring at

> > his mobile.

> >

> > Do you know them?

> >

> > People like this should be named and shamed -

> and

> > fined by the council.

>

> You need to get a life mate!

>

> Its a 7 second job with a bucket of water! If

> selfish people like you stopped paving over their

> gardens so they can park their precious cars then

> dogs might not need to take a dump on the

> pavement.



What so they can "go" in people's front gardens instead!!??

rendelharris Wrote:

------------------------------------------------------


> You a vegan, uncleglen? If not then how do you

> sleep at night thinking about your own slaughter

> of animals? Do you own a car? Then how do you

> sleep at night thinking about the contribution you

> make to pollution which kills tens of thousands of

> humans every year?"


I'm vegan and don't own a car. What do I win?

On the contrary. The aim of CCTV cameras is deterrence of crime not to catch anyone committing one.


geobz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> OP couldn't you found a better use for your

> installed cam?

>

> Now you just gave away on a public forum the

> location of that camera for some dog pooping

> reason giving compromising the purpose you have it

> for...

I think that this is the most stupid comment that I have seen on this thread.


Firstly the front garden was paved over years before we bought the property and secondly are you really suggesting that it is fine for people to let their dogs go out excrete in other peoples' front gardens?? That way they would also be committing trespass as?well as fouling.


I think that you need to get a brain as well as a life.


Toosmart1973 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> woodstock Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > On Friday morning I discovered a large dog poop

> on

> > the pavement directly outside my house on

> > Dovercourt Road. Fortunately I recently

> installed

> > a CCTV system and have photos of the dog "in

> > action" and its owner - conveniently staring at

> > his mobile.

> >

> > Do you know them?

> >

> > People like this should be named and shamed -

> and

> > fined by the council.

>

> You need to get a life mate!

>

> Its a 7 second job with a bucket of water! If

> selfish people like you stopped paving over their

> gardens so they can park their precious cars then

> dogs might not need to take a dump on the

> pavement.

This thread is hilarious. Surely everyone can agree dog poo is highly unpleasant and it's irresponsible not to clean up after your own dog.


We went through a spate of someone using outside our flats as a toilet, biggest shits I'd ever seen! Thankfully now we just get fox shit, hmmm thinking about it fox poo is probably worse than dog poo.


List of poos in order of grossest


1-human poo

2-fox poo

3-dog poo

4-cat poo

5-bird poo

Thumbs up to Woodstock and thumbs down to all his/her decriers. Letting your dog cack and leaving it for others to walk in is loathsome.

People who say "sad" to such interventions say much more about themselves than the people they criticise and mock. Maybe if they slipped and fell on a big pile of oggy-doggy, perhaps even getting some on their wrist and hand as they tried to deflect the worst of the tumble, they'd think differently.

woodstock Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


>

> Firstly the front garden was paved over years

> before we bought the property and secondly are you

> really suggesting that it is fine for people to

> let their dogs go out excrete in other peoples'

> front gardens?? That way they would also be

> committing trespass as?well as fouling.

>


Can dogs commit trespass?


Why don't you grow a pair Woodstock and stop twitching your curtains spying on potentially innocent passers by and speak to the dog owner next time he/she walks past?......as i'm sure you know most dog walkers frequent the same routes at around the same time. I'd bet the owner simply missed his/her beloved Shep curling one out whilst he/she was busy on the phone! I'm sure they'd apologise if they knew.

Happy Cyclist Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> A new entry straight in at number one!

>

> 1-dragon poo

> 2-human poo

> 3-fox poo

> 4-dog poo

> 5-cat poo

> 6-bird poo


Only contender numbers 1 and 6 can land unexpectedly on your head. I don't think this has been taken account of in the seemingly least innocuous position of bird poo.

@nxjen you raise a very pertinent point. After careful consideration bird poo has been elevated to 5th. Due to the innocuous nature of bird poo, a higher position was unattainable.



1-dragon poo

2-human poo

3-fox poo

4-dog poo

5-bird poo

6-cat poo

I would have thought that it was totally uncontroversial to express the view that it was thoroughly antisocial for people to allow their dogs to crap all over the pavement and then to fail to pick the faeces up. But one can never underestimate the ability of certain EDF posters to be snarky about people expressing such mainstream views while they attempt to demonstrate how clever they think they are or how toosmart they are.


As I mentioned earlier in this thread, dog poo can cause blindness in children. It's not a subject for comedy.

I'm torn now, I'm a dog owner who always picks up my mutts mess, but I'm tempted to train them to poop right at the end of the OPs drive.


Professional dog photos cost a fortune and this way I can get some done for free, and even posted straight to the EDF for my downloading convenience..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Absolute mugs. That's what they take you for.  
    • Trossachs definitely have one! 
    • A A day-school for girls and a boarding school for boys (even with, by the late '90s, a tiny cadre of girls) are very different places.  Though there are some similarities. I think all schools, for instance, have similar "rules", much as they all nail up notices about "potential" and "achievement" and keeping to the left on the stairs. The private schools go a little further, banging on about "serving the public", as they have since they were set up (either to supply the colonies with District Commissioners, Brigadiers and Missionaries, or the provinces with railway engineers), so they've got the language and rituals down nicely. Which, i suppose, is what visitors and day-pupils expect, and are expected, to see. A boarding school, outside the cloistered hours of lesson-times, once the day-pupils and teaching staff have been sent packing, the gates and chapel safely locked and the brochures put away, becomes a much less ambassadorial place. That's largely because they're filled with several hundred bored, tired, self-supervised adolescents condemned to spend the night together in the flickering, dripping bowels of its ancient buildings, most of which were designed only to impress from the outside, the comfort of their occupants being secondary to the glory of whatever piratical benefactor had, in a last-ditch attempt to sway the judgement of their god, chucked a little of their ill-gotten at the alleged improvement of the better class of urchin. Those adolescents may, to the curious eyes of the outer world, seem privileged but, in that moment, they cannot access any outer world (at least pre-1996 or thereabouts). Their whole existence, for months at a time, takes place in uniformity behind those gates where money, should they have any to hand, cannot purchase better food or warmer clothing. In that peculiar world, there is no difference between the seventh son of a murderous sheikh, the darling child of a ball-bearing magnate, the umpteenth Viscount Smethwick, or the offspring of some hapless Foreign Office drone who's got themselves posted to Minsk. They are egalitarian, in that sense, but that's as far as it goes. In any place where rank and priviilege mean nothing, other measures will evolve, which is why even the best-intentioned of committees will, from time to time, spawn its cliques and launch heated disputes over archaic matters that, in any other context, would have long been forgotten. The same is true of the boarding school which, over the dismal centuries, has developed a certain culture all its own, with a language indended to pass all understanding and attitiudes and practices to match. This is unsurprising as every new intake will, being young and disoriented, eagerly mimic their seniors, and so also learn those words and attitudes and practices which, miserably or otherwise, will more accurately reflect the weight of history than the Guardian's style-guide and, to contemporary eyes and ears, seem outlandish, beastly and deplorably wicked. Which, of course, it all is. But however much we might regret it, and urge headteachers to get up on Sundays and preach about how we should all be tolerant, not kill anyone unnecessarily, and take pity on the oiks, it won't make the blindest bit of difference. William Golding may, according to psychologists, have overstated his case but I doubt that many 20th Century boarders would agree with them. Instead, they might look to Shakespeare, who cheerfully exploits differences of sex and race and belief and ability to arm his bullies, murderers, fraudsters and tyrants and remains celebrated to this day,  Admittedly, this is mostly opinion, borne only of my own regrettable experience and, because I had that experience and heard those words (though, being naive and small-townish, i didn't understand them till much later) and saw and suffered a heap of brutishness*, that might make my opinion both unfair and biased.  If so, then I can only say it's the least that those institutions deserve. Sure, the schools themselves don't willingly foster that culture, which is wholly contrary to everything in the brochures, but there's not much they can do about it without posting staff permanently in corridors and dormitories and washrooms, which would, I'd suggest, create a whole other set of problems, not least financial. So, like any other business, they take care of the money and keep aloof from the rest. That, to my mind, is the problem. They've turned something into a business that really shouldn't be a business. Education is one thing, raising a child is another, and limited-liability corporations, however charitable, tend not to make the best parents. And so, in retrospect, I'm inclined not to blame the students either (though, for years after, I eagerly read the my Old School magazine, my heart doing a little dance at every black-edged announcement of a yachting tragedy, avalanche or coup). They get chucked into this swamp where they have to learn to fend for themselves and so many, naturally, will behave like predators in an attempt to fit in. Not all, certainly. Some will keep their heads down and hope not to be noticed while others, if they have a particular talent, might find that it protects them. But that leaves more than enough to keep the toxic culture alive, and it is no surprise at all that when they emerge they appear damaged to the outside world. For that's exactly what they are. They might, and sometimes do, improve once returned to the normal stream of life if given time and support, and that's good. But the damage lasts, all the same, and isn't a reason to vote for them. * Not, if it helps to disappoint any lawyers, at Dulwich, though there's nothing in the allegations that I didn't instantly recognise, 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...