Jump to content

Recommended Posts

DJKillaQueen Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sigh...you are not being sacked you are being

> asked to sign new contracts....an entirely

> different thing altogether. And just as any

> employee in ANY sector chooses to sign or leave

> the job the same is for you. We can disagree on

> the reasons why the new contract is or isn't

> suitable or good but the fact remains that

> terminating contracts and issuing new ones is a

> normal part of UK employment practise for the vast

> majority of employees, and fire fighters need to

> understand that.

>

> Also MOST of the public sector workers I know (and

> I know lots) chose the public sector because of

> the job security, employment rights and strong

> unions and generous pension schemes. So it's

> absolutely not true to say that people choose

> public sector jobs out of some altuistic sense of

> duty to the public. All the ffs I know all joined

> the fire service because they thought it would be

> an exciting job to do. Many of them are ex

> military and thought their skills would be

> relevant. None of them joined out of an over

> riding sense of public duty. So that's another

> myth that in my view, and it is just my view,

> that's being conveniently peddled to try and give

> credibility to the FFU stance in this dispute.



I did not say EVERYONE joined out of an over riding sense of public duty, I said "I" did and I know many people who chose the job because of the good they would be doing and not for the money, pension, union etc.


I did not even know there was a pension or union, I didn't even ask how much money I was going to get, that may make me a little mad (looking back I think it too), but once again it is the truth.


The fact that terminating contracts and issuing new ones is a normal part of UK employment practice does not make it right, what is the point of a contract if one side is able to change it at will without agreement.


I think it is only employment law that allows it.


Maybe the fact that you are willing to except that as OK while I don't, goes a long way in explaining why we diagree about this whole issue.


I'm sure I will never be able to change you mind, so I will leave it there.


I wish everyone on here a long, happy and safe life.


spc

Definitely good news for all. Shame that Coleman along with much of tomorrows press are claiming a victory over the fbu. I had hoped the management would take the moral high ground and drop the 188 if only to avoid exposing public to unnecessary risk at a dangerous time and shame theft some what. In the end it was the fbu who did this postponing strike action in spite of colemans refusal to offer any assurances over contract impositon. Quite the opposite in fact he gloated over their step down as a victory rubbing their noses in the fact they had won nothing, while of course blowing their best opportunity to stretch the resources of assett co to breaking point.


They have I suppose sacrificed an opportunity to score a ko blow to management in the interests of public safety and no doubt due to the wishes of their members. I hope they are not now trounced by management and that their sensible decision to abandon this strike does at the least score some pr points as well as providing London with the insurance against disaster that the city requires at this time.

Well my dear EDites, I suppose this is more or less the end of this topic........ or is it? We will see. I thank you all for taking up this post and was amazed at some of the comments, but as we are all different is stands to reason that the opinions would go the same way. I agree with Iain on most of this. I am gutted that Coleman and Dobson will try and turn this to their advantage when it could all have been avoided with a bit of common sense and good will! See you all after arbitration?

Arbitration is the best route......and probably the result will be 11/13 with a provision to review after 12 months (and revert back if necessary). And yes, Coleman and the LFB would do best to be humble at this stage. Ego on both sides has definitely driven some of the dispute. Now it's time for good will.


Thank you for providing such a stimulating thread Moflo. And I hope the outcome is one that both sides can be happy with.

If you've lost the argument, Moflo, I should start attacking the people.


In particular I think dragging up uncorroborated evidence of silly behaviour in the past is a really constructive approach. Maybe choose something at least 6 months ago?


Or longer? How about his schoolfriends?


Perhaps we could call him names?


What about photos, have you got any photos of him picking his nose or something?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It’s 3 AM - Anyone know when this horrendous noise is going to stop?! We’re on the Sainsbury’s Local end of Landells and am quite frankly sympathising with all of you nearer Peckham Rye. My ears are ringing! How is this ok?! 
    • https://chng.it/YXCH5XXVMY We live near and it’s absolute hell. The noise of the people coming and going from Peckham is the worse. They are so loud and obnoxious. This is my 5th year of this nonsense. People vomiting in my front garden, urinating in my neighbour’s gardens, throwing food into my garden. Screaming waking up my children while waiting for their Ubers. The people that organise this festival are 100% obnoxious. They told us there would be security along our road (there wasn’t). I asked them to put up my family in a hotel but they wouldn’t. It’s actually a human rights infraction for all of us this badly affected. Over the years I have spent so much money trying to be away this weekend but none of us should have to. The data also shows that most people coming are not local residents - so of 3000 tickets sold, hardly any to residents; it’s easy to argue that it disadvantages us residents way more than any conceivable benefit. My elderly neighbours are besides themselves. Every year the setup and striking of the festival blocks off the park during half term, plus the antisocial behaviour and loud noises mean actual children that live here are prevented from using the park and playgrounds. The police initially rejected the license last year… then suddenly changed their mind with no apparent reason… seems legit. Also the GALA team lie and make false statements in their advertising about consulting with us (they don’t they just tell us what is going to happen then are extremely obstinate and rude). My neighbour runs Friends of Peckham Rye and has been totally distressed by all the damage done to recent planting initiatives funded by the local community. GALA do not repair this, GALA pay off Southwark and then Southwark refuse to confirm what they are paid, or how much (if anything) is spent to repair the park.   This needs to be stopped once and for all!!   Petition asking Southwark to stop providing the license to GALA once and for all.    I mean I am sure they will listen to us just like they did about the LTNs…   https://chng.it/YXCH5XXVMY
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...