Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Bic Basher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The ELL will call at Denmark Hill and Peckham Rye

> with 4 trains per hour (every 15 minutes) to

> Clapham/Dalston Junction. It'll also replace the

> current Southern London Bridge to Victoria

> service.


So will they be replacing the LB - Victoria service with another service which goes through DH to Victoria?

caro ed Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bic Basher Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > The ELL will call at Denmark Hill and Peckham

> Rye

> > with 4 trains per hour (every 15 minutes) to

> > Clapham/Dalston Junction. It'll also replace

> the

> > current Southern London Bridge to Victoria

> > service.

>

> So will they be replacing the LB - Victoria

> service with another service which goes through DH

> to Victoria?


There have been proposals to add an additional service from Victoria to Bellingham which was scrapped. So they'll be 2tph provided by Southeastern to Victoria as now from PR and DH as well as the 2tph to Kentish Town (extended to Bedford in peaks) via Elephant and the 4tph to Clapham and Dalston.


Once the Southern service closes in 2012, passengers from DH will either have to change at Peckham Rye for LB or Canada Water via the Jubilee Line.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The link below has further information suggesting that the shop demolition and square redevelopment is funded separately from the station upgrades, so will go ahead:   https://www.ianvisits.co.uk/articles/peckham-rye-stations-step-free-upgrade-has-been-put-on-hold-82360/ 
    • Last time the toilets were out of operation in the station M&S we were all told to go out and up to Sainsbo! Certainly didn't close (I'm not suggesting that's the thing the library should do!)
    • Was it the two proxy votes that had swung it for Cllr McAsh in the first round? Interesting that he lost by two votes in the second. One wonders what the next move for Cllr McAsh is and whether the infighting will continue between the various factions within Southwark Labour?
    • Has anything emerged as to how the reported misinterpretation of rules ruling out proxy votes occurred, or what the specific fault was?  I've found and looked through https://labour.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/Labour-group-model-standing-orders-2023.pdf, which afaics seems to be a prime relevant document.  It allows for local council Labour groups making minor amendments to cater for their council's particular form of organisation.  I've not seen any _explicit_ mention of proxy voting in the model SOs document itself.  I'm  attaching my notes on it.     re_Labour-Group-Model-SOs.txt
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...