Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I don't think schools' DO enough to educate children on the dangers of knifes and weapons.


And don't forget, these are children. It's very very sad.


Children that carry knifes are more at risk of getting stabbed by their own knife than they are of actually hurting anyone else with it.


Bullying at school is also rife - some schools do not, or do not know how to deal with it.


I'm very happy the boy is ok, but it's incredibly sad that he would have been on his way to school - he's technically still a child.

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I don't think schools' DO enough to educate

> children on the dangers of knifes and weapons.


Or, you know, parents could do it instead of adding it to the "list of things schools should teach our kids".

I'm not saying it's the schools' responsibility solely, at all.


I know there are parents who leave everything to school, but that isn't my point. Children are together at school and the dynamics are different to the child they are at home.


School's have a zero tolerance policy, but I know that there's a gap between what adults think children understand and what children do actually understand.


There was bullying at my daughter's school, but because it wasn't physical, the children didn't understand it was still bullying.


Knife danger is way down on the curriculum but affecting too many children and taking too many lives for it to be not discussed properly. there are some fantastic resources and opportunities at school, which are different to home.


Parents and schools should work together - the children are part of a community.

Jules-and-Boo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Knife danger is way down on the curriculum


What on the curriculum would you like to remove in order to make room for lessons about the dangers of knives?

Why would you remove anything from the curriculum dogkennelhillbilly?

Surely it should be instilled as a set of standards in the pupils and not a separate lesson replacing something else !


I agree that it is also the parents responsibility as well but it needs to be tackled as a problem by parents, school and society as a whole.


I'm glad the boy in question is okay after the awful incident this morning and my thoughts and prayers are with him and his parents tonight

Really? "the kids" and their desire for weapons and their belief that all other "the kids" are carrying weapons. That's absolute and utter nonsense and, frankly, irresponsible scare-mongering. Might I suggest you meet and talk to some of "the kids".


I don't doubt that knife crime amongst young people in London is worth taking seriously and applaud, whole-hearetdly the work of organisations like Redthread (do listen to that radio doc it is utterly amazing) but most of "the kids" you will meet, if you deign to engage with them, are passionate, energetic, very hard working and thoughtful. Absolutely worth talking to and listening to.

Fundamentally, we need to address the wider issue of societies attitudes to what it means to be a boy / man. The idea that you must be tough, aggressive.. stand your ground etc. I know it's judgmental, but I do despair at some of the 'boys will be boy's' type attitudes that prevail.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fundamentally, we need to address the wider issue

> of societies attitudes to what it means to be a

> boy / man. The idea that you must be tough,

> aggressive.. stand your ground etc. I know it's

> judgmental, but I do despair at some of the 'boys

> will be boy's' type attitudes that prevail.


I thought attitudes had improved - but maybe it's just me

getting older.


When I was young you got in a fight just for accidentally

looking at someone.

rahrahrah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Fundamentally, we need to address the wider issue

> of societies attitudes to what it means to be a

> boy / man. The idea that you must be tough,

> aggressive.. stand your ground etc. I know it's

> judgmental, but I do despair at some of the 'boys

> will be boy's' type attitudes that prevail.


Lol yes, we've heard that one, whats next? changing the way genitals work, maybe cut them off completely when a child is born and get rid of genders...

The kids are mostly alright, but they're not REALLY 100% alright, are they?


Not hen we're warning them about killing each other at school/ on their way to or from school.


They need all the help they can get.


Of course most kids are fine, but it's the ones that aren't that need guidance and support. It's exactly the kind of ignorance that is causing problems.


Ask any parent whose child has died if "the kids are alright."

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...