Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Going south it's impossible to use, badly positioned lamp posts, bollards etc. and pedestrians use it. It is far safer to cut across the pedestrian area (slowly) I always give pedestrians priority and cycle very slowly. Going north it's not much better because it's difficult to position yourself properly at the lights from that angle, street furniture in the way etc. The cycle lane down alongside the path on the Rye is ridiculous, so dangerous when buses are parked because pedestrians walk straight onto it from between buses as they don't know it's a cycle path. I'm not a fan of slippery blue cycle paint but it would be a short term fix here.

This p*sses me off .It's badly designed and was poorly consulted on when introduced .I hate to think how much the "consultation" cost .


Concerns were raised at the time and ignored http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,363258,363820#msg-363820

Having had a good response (it seems) to complaint to councellor about poor road surface at top of Rye lane, can something be done about road surface at Kings on the Rye junction as it was once known, going East from Goose Green the road is bad, which causes risks for cyclists at a busy junction when they need to concentrate on traffic and cannot swerve around pot holes.
Rye Lane is often so crowded with pedestrians on the pavement, that I have found myself walking in the road simply to get to where I have to go - dentist or station.I certainly had not noticed any dedicated cycle routes in Rye Lane. I don't know why they can't be more clearly marked, as they certainly should and are elsewhere.

RecorderSue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rye Lane is often so crowded with pedestrians on

> the pavement, that I have found myself walking in

> the road simply to get to where I have to go -

> dentist or station.I certainly had not noticed any

> dedicated cycle routes in Rye Lane. I don't know

> why they can't be more clearly marked, as they

> certainly should and are elsewhere.


Because it wont look 'pretty' if it were painted blue or indicated more clearly. It's clear that when designing the camouflaged cycle route aesthetics were the main concern over anything else like functionality etc. At the absolute bare minimum all they need to do is to paint white lines like they do on all other shared cycle/pedestrian pavements. Won't cost much and may make it much clearer for everyone. Ideally painting the surface a different color altogether will benefit all.

Hi all, just to say I reading all your thoughts and comments and I will relay them to officers. I don't believe there is scope for major changes to the set up at the moment. This would only be feasible at the point at which the Aylsham Centre redevelopment occurs. There could however be scope for interim measures to improve the site for cyclists and pedestrians.

Thanks Renata

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How about a tiny raised border where the cycle

> lane meets the pedestrian bit, to raise awareness

> of the cycle lane? I imagine it's a cheapish

> interim solution?


That just introduces a trip hazard for pedestrians and a "clipping wheels" hazard for cyclists. Similar to that awful ribbed tactile paving (in theory designed to assist visually impaired people in working out the pedestrian side of shared use paths) that becomes super slippy in the wet

  • 2 weeks later...

I complained about this stretch of road a year (or so) ago when they resurfaced it at the bus stop (which wasn't that bad) but didn't continue to the dangerous bit that you refer to. I didn't get a response and after one too many near misses whilst trying to avoid the holes, I changed my route.


peckhamside Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Having had a good response (it seems) to complaint

> to councellor about poor road surface at top of

> Rye lane, can something be done about road surface

> at Kings on the Rye junction as it was once known,

> going East from Goose Green the road is bad, which

> causes risks for cyclists at a busy junction when

> they need to concentrate on traffic and cannot

> swerve around pot holes.

It seems to be impossible to get this section near Kings on the Rye made safer. I have complained about it. Other potholes get filled but this bit simply continues to deteriorate. The lanes are narrow,and the traffic is trying to go too fast.


It is a very bad place to be trying to swerve around potholes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Why is the name a big of a red flag? Blighty is a common name for the UK whatever people might think.
    • The only election which counts is the General Election.  There is still strong resentment for fourteen year's of Conservative rule. They squeezed the working class's way to hard, then they squeezed the middle class, but somehow the upper class never got touched, funny that.   There is also new resentment for Labour because of the utter balls up they've made of things since coming to power nine months ago. The majority of the population (or at least those with an ounce of common sense) want these clowns out of office ASAP because they see the damage they are doing to UK plc. They squeezed the pensioners, then the farmers and then business. They made and broke promise after promise, or just didn't tell the truth or say what they where going to do, otherwise known as merely lying to get elected. Inflation may be falling but the cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised. They will never be trusted once they are ousted from power in about four and a half years time.   Everything they do and touch causes further harm, led by three stooges, Rayner, Reeves and balls'less Starmer, who couldn't fight his way out of a paper bag. He still thinks he's a solicitor at the DPP. Rather than spending week upon week getting involved in international politics he needs to be sorting out the UK's issues, sadly he's not up to the job and nor are his Cabinet.  Society needs a mix of people with different skills to prosper, not more and more graduates who can't get jobs in what they studied in.   Reform is the current anti establishment party, which will hopefully wither away back to where it came from.  The Liberals and Greens, well what can you say apart from using them as another alternative vote of dissatisfaction, but neither will come to power.  The country seriously needs stability and a Government that stands up for and represents it's people, not what MP's want but what the constituencies want and need.  Government needs to become far more open and transparent, it needs to be seen to be doing its job, doing what MP's are elected to do,  working for the people in the constituencies, getting back to basic principles and rebuilding the trust which has been lost by successive party's immaterial of them being, red, blue, light blue, yellow, green or some other colour.     
    • That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’.        Brexit happened Sue.  Boring graphs!  Calling Nigel Farage a plastic patriot is also very insulting seeing as he and the Reform Party have had a landslide victory all over England.
    • These charity collectors are often classed as chuggers.  It can be scandalous that the charity/admin may keep a huge percentage of your donations and a tiny percentage is  actually given to the charity.   I can not speak for individual collectors - but it common practice.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...