Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Going south it's impossible to use, badly positioned lamp posts, bollards etc. and pedestrians use it. It is far safer to cut across the pedestrian area (slowly) I always give pedestrians priority and cycle very slowly. Going north it's not much better because it's difficult to position yourself properly at the lights from that angle, street furniture in the way etc. The cycle lane down alongside the path on the Rye is ridiculous, so dangerous when buses are parked because pedestrians walk straight onto it from between buses as they don't know it's a cycle path. I'm not a fan of slippery blue cycle paint but it would be a short term fix here.

This p*sses me off .It's badly designed and was poorly consulted on when introduced .I hate to think how much the "consultation" cost .


Concerns were raised at the time and ignored http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/read.php?5,363258,363820#msg-363820

Having had a good response (it seems) to complaint to councellor about poor road surface at top of Rye lane, can something be done about road surface at Kings on the Rye junction as it was once known, going East from Goose Green the road is bad, which causes risks for cyclists at a busy junction when they need to concentrate on traffic and cannot swerve around pot holes.
Rye Lane is often so crowded with pedestrians on the pavement, that I have found myself walking in the road simply to get to where I have to go - dentist or station.I certainly had not noticed any dedicated cycle routes in Rye Lane. I don't know why they can't be more clearly marked, as they certainly should and are elsewhere.

RecorderSue Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Rye Lane is often so crowded with pedestrians on

> the pavement, that I have found myself walking in

> the road simply to get to where I have to go -

> dentist or station.I certainly had not noticed any

> dedicated cycle routes in Rye Lane. I don't know

> why they can't be more clearly marked, as they

> certainly should and are elsewhere.


Because it wont look 'pretty' if it were painted blue or indicated more clearly. It's clear that when designing the camouflaged cycle route aesthetics were the main concern over anything else like functionality etc. At the absolute bare minimum all they need to do is to paint white lines like they do on all other shared cycle/pedestrian pavements. Won't cost much and may make it much clearer for everyone. Ideally painting the surface a different color altogether will benefit all.

Hi all, just to say I reading all your thoughts and comments and I will relay them to officers. I don't believe there is scope for major changes to the set up at the moment. This would only be feasible at the point at which the Aylsham Centre redevelopment occurs. There could however be scope for interim measures to improve the site for cyclists and pedestrians.

Thanks Renata

titch juicy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> How about a tiny raised border where the cycle

> lane meets the pedestrian bit, to raise awareness

> of the cycle lane? I imagine it's a cheapish

> interim solution?


That just introduces a trip hazard for pedestrians and a "clipping wheels" hazard for cyclists. Similar to that awful ribbed tactile paving (in theory designed to assist visually impaired people in working out the pedestrian side of shared use paths) that becomes super slippy in the wet

  • 2 weeks later...

I complained about this stretch of road a year (or so) ago when they resurfaced it at the bus stop (which wasn't that bad) but didn't continue to the dangerous bit that you refer to. I didn't get a response and after one too many near misses whilst trying to avoid the holes, I changed my route.


peckhamside Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Having had a good response (it seems) to complaint

> to councellor about poor road surface at top of

> Rye lane, can something be done about road surface

> at Kings on the Rye junction as it was once known,

> going East from Goose Green the road is bad, which

> causes risks for cyclists at a busy junction when

> they need to concentrate on traffic and cannot

> swerve around pot holes.

It seems to be impossible to get this section near Kings on the Rye made safer. I have complained about it. Other potholes get filled but this bit simply continues to deteriorate. The lanes are narrow,and the traffic is trying to go too fast.


It is a very bad place to be trying to swerve around potholes.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
    • Looking for crate/toys/play pen etc. Ideally will buy in a bundle. Can collect!
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...