Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So I?ve been reading the news on the Beeb?s tinterwebsite and apparently the EU has given up on trying to convert Britain to the Metric System.


What are people?s thoughts on the benefits of having a universal system of measurement that is used worldwide?


Growing up in a country that had made the change from Imperial to Metric shortly before I was born Metric was used officially but people still seemed to use Imperial in everyday life. It has led to a situation where many people now seem to use Imperial for certain measurement and Metric for others. I for instance measure height in Imperial but weight in Metric. Which gets confusing when I?m filling out the forms at the doctors.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/1413-metric-vs-imperial/
Share on other sites

Brendan Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What are people?s thoughts on the benefits of

> having a universal system of measurement that is

> used worldwide?


Obviously a standard system makes life so much easier, but being of that age where inches were taught before the centimilliltres were drempt up it's hard to convert to the metric system for stuff.


If I have to estimate something in metric, I have to do it in inches, then convert to centimeters mentally. Daft I know!


One thing that does make me smile is our ability to swap between Centigrade and farenheight (Sp?)One minute we're talking about it being freezing, then the following week (This is England) we're talking about it being in the hundreds, like both are on the same scale!

Although I measure heat in farenheit (i.e. 100 equals hot) I measure cold in centigrade (i.e. 0 equals freezing). Weird non?


Height - ft and inches

Weight - kilos except at the butchers/greengrocers when I revert to lbs (and I'm under 30!)

Distance - metres then miles (?!)

Fluids (no laughing at the back) - pints then litres for higher figures

Area - acres (I was once told it is roughly one football pitch and is therefore easy to visualise)


God, no wonder the English are seen as eccentric.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I really don’t want to be a complainer, but mail is definitely no longer arriving in SE22.
    • I would recommend Lucasz - he responded to our request very quickly, gave us an excellent quote and cleaned up after himself. Will definitely ask him to do any future jobs. 
    • General view is it is tokenistic from Iran, not looking to harm life but show that they are retaliating. Same thing happened after the earlier Israeli attack back in the distant part. There will be debate, even at the top of the Iranian authorities.  Israel even without the US hold the cards.  Although are in this position due to decades of US support. As per my post on the other thread much of the reason the world is in this position is botched US post second world war middle East policy.  Supporting both sides in the Iran/Iraq war being particularly striking Trump mark 1 emboldened the right wing in Israel, perhaps pushed Hammas to more extreme action, and led to the Iranians going rogue on nukes.  I think that the latter was to put them in a stronger position in opening up grade, a country not able to sell vast quantities of oil ,(and gas?) But how does the world move on from this mess? By all means give other views to my simplistic ones   
    • The NYT ( that right wing alarmist rag) has reported that Iran told Qatar so they could prepare. Iran and Q are on good terms so Q won’t retaliate, esp as Iran is only targeting US bases, which everyone knew to expect.     If anything, it draws Qatar into the dialogue and Q will privately be urging Iran to back down. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...