Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Probably not a useful answer for the OP, since I'm guessing you are travelling very soon, but Nationwide are very much your friend for international travel. We have an account with a Cirrus/Switch card, plus a credit card and it has saved me loads of money over the past few years. I woke up to this when I paid a 600 euro hotel bill on a different CC and paid nearly ?20 for the pleasure.


Before we travel we bung enough money in the account, then you can withdraw the local cash at ATMs anywhere. You get the Visa rate of exchange (i.e. very close to the 'proper' rate, rather than the rip off tourist rate - 1.47 euros to the pound at the beginning of the month) and no commission or charges. You save about ?50 for each ?1000 you spend.


The credit card is the same - no charges (unless you use it for cash withdrawals) and the same damn good exchange rate.


I can't recommend doing this highly enough.

  • 2 weeks later...

IbizaBG Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Mark & Spencers wins - hands down... every time

> !!!!


check the rates:


Post Office ?1 = ?1.37,

M&S - ?1 = ?1.38

Thomas Exchange Global ?1 = ?1.40


not much in it today, but I've seen a bigger difference in the past. Obviously, if you don't go through Victoria Station regularly, M&S & the PO are more convenient.

Thanks everyone. I got 1.39999999999 from the PO as it was bit last minute. Didn't want to use card abroad as i am charged ?1.50 for each blinking transaction! Could have got 1.42 while abroad, with no commission, but it was much of a muchness for the amount i was taking out really.


thanks all!


O

Barclays don't, I always just take cash out when I get there. Also as a general rule, be wary of no commission places, the rates are usually shocking (not in M&S though).


The absolute best is www.xe.com, which gives you the mid-market rate, but you need to be transferring it to another bank account in the country you're going to. Useful if you're visiting relatives, maybe - zap it into their account and then collect it off them when you get there.

Barclay's do charge, though not on a 'per transaction' fee basis. The small print from their website:



A 2.75% charge for Barclays handling costs and any VISA processing fees is included in the sterling conversion shown on your statement and applies to all foreign transactions. There is an additional 2% transaction charge (min ?1.50 max ?4.50) if you withdraw cash overseas via a cash machine or in a bank, except Barclays cash machines or those within the Global Alliance as listed below. If you use a cash machine outside the Global Alliance, you may also incur an additional service charge on top. There is a 2% transaction charge (min ?1.50 max ?4.50) if you use your card in the UK to obtain sterling anywhere other than a cash machine or Barclays branch, and currency or travellers? cheques anywhere other than a Barclays branch or Barclays website or via Barclays Travel Line.


So, take out 1000 euros at a foreign ATM with your Barclays Switch/Cirrus card and it'll most likely cost you ?4.50 Foreign Cash Withdrawal Fee plus 27.50 euros 'Foreign Loading Charge for the pleasure, i.e. about 24 quid in total.


Nationwide is - I believe - the only one that does not charge like this for debit cards.

  • 2 years later...

I normally check the Money Saving Expert webiste on the best deals for travel money. It's totally impatial and shows up how bad the banks really are and all the hidden charges on their cards. There's also a great application if you need to exchange cash that tells you where the best places to go are.


http://www.moneysavingexpert.com/travel/cheap-travel-money?dd

A question on the pre-paid cards. I did use a travelex one at some point and I think I stopped because my bank (Lloyds) had a charge for when I got travel money from a bureau de change, another bank etc, etc. Does transferring money onto the Fairfx card incur any fee from your bank?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • the same complaint was made about usa news stations 4 years ago.  its an old story. Its quite shocking how intelligent people are so easily manipulated. I
    • With slightly less respect Headnun I have  watched the 1 hour video - he said what he said and he did what he did. And his faux-wink wink “no violence people” fools no one but fools. Are you a fool?    the bbc told the truth - and it’s a straight up lie to say otherwise. Did they edit and cut to the chase to make a point? Absolutely  and correctly  he was not edited to say things he didn’t say  I cannot believe you watched the entire video and are trying to say the bbc edit somehow misrepresented what he said and Back in the real world - did the nutters who showed up at the white house materialise because of a bbc edit ffs - have some self respect and recognise what’s going on 
    • Friends and family in the 'States always say how wonderful it is to be in Britain and see our news coverage.  It's all partisan out there. The BBC manages to simultaneously p off the left and the right so must be doing something right.
    • From the BBC: "The conclusion of that deliberation is that we accept that the way the speech was edited did give the impression of a direct call for violent action. The BBC would like to apologise for that error of judgement." What is wrong is editing someone to make him say something they didn't.  With respect Sephiroth, this is something I know a bit about and I have encountered, over the last decade, people in programming editing contributors to make them say things they didn't, the end point being to hang them out to dry. It's happening more and more and it's my job to make sure that people on TV are not mis-represented, but shown in their true light so that viewers can make up their own minds. You have no idea what goes on behind the scenes and how hard some us fight to keep things impartial.  It's also worth mentioning that I have personally lost work because of Trump suing US networks, and that's one of the lesser reasons why I'd like to see him gone.  But broadcasters have a moral obligation to tell the truth and that's the hill that most decent professionals in the industry are willing to die on. Otherwise, how can the viewing public trust anything that's beamed into their living rooms? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...