Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Hi


Yes that shouldn't happen, it's something we introduced last night and so appreciate the feedback.


Please could you look at a page e.g. http://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/forum/list.php?30 and hold the Ctrl key and press the F5 key and let me know if it still happens.


Also please could you let me know what browser and computer you are using e.g. Internet Explorer 7 and Windows XP. An easy way to do this is go to http://supportdetails.com/ and email it to [email protected]


Thanks


Mark

HAL9000 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Still ranged-right at my end even after Ctrl/F5.

> The Forum's pages are about 15% wider than my

> screen resolution - which is set to 1024 x 768.



Same for me, using Firefox 3.6.12

Hi, if you're seeing the adverts stacked on top of each other at the top of the screen the please refresh the page (press F5 on a PC), that will fix it.


As for the page being sat on the right hand side of the screen, it's something we have to look into. It's because the new 'containing frame' of the page is wider than your screen; in that frame is a blank column, the content column then the advert column. You people with a 1024pixel wide screen only see the first two columns, so it looks like is sat to the right.


Apologies for any inconvenience and I'm hoping we'll work out a fix for it


Mark

OK, so we should have resolved the right alignment issue, if you still see the site aligned to the right please refresh the page (F5 on a PC).


Also there was a problem with the forum slowing down, this was because of a script that had to work out what section of the forum was showing before showing the ads. We have removed that script and, although the ads show in all sections of the forum it should be faster.

Just logged in to find the main frame ranged left with the ads stacked vertically to its right. The page width is fractionally larger than my screen resolution.


The site is now functional albeit somewhat lopsided.


For what it's worth, from an aesthetic point of view, I would favour a symmetrical layout wherein the adverts are arrayed horizontally across the screen at the top, middle or bottom (or even all three) with a centred main frame rather than the current asymmetrical design which looks a bit odd (to me).

I have an annoying glitch when I look at group pm's. The pm is pushed below the ads which are to the right with just white space where the pm should sit. It's only for pms sent to multiple recipients. Singel recipient pms sit where they should.
Viewing on me mobile (samsung wave through opera) looks really strange now, ads in the middle going down centrally and the thread lists are all squashed up instead of nicely stretched. Used to have to zoom in and out to navigate around the forum but not now... dunno if it's anything that can be changed or I shall have to stick with complaining about stupid smartphone apps... Using Bolt lite looks ok though *shrugs*

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...